tusharcosmic
22 June 2010 at 13:28
Most of the advocates perform the role of a player who kick the ball and score a goal towards his own goal post.
Most of the cases won by the advocates are not because of their wisdom,knowledge of hard/smart work but because of the follies,retardedness and idiocy of the opponent advocate or opponent party.
Mostly when an advocate loses a cases for his own mistakes he alleges the judge for being corrupt.
An advocate who charges the client for each hearing separately is never interested in winning the case.He/she is interested in getting more and more dates because this way he/she will go on earning more and more.
What do you say ?
Mr Mahender,you are right that doing wrong tarnishes the reputation of the advocates but people are very short sighted,they do not understand the long life benefits of a good goodwill,as a property dealer should do fair dealing to get more business bit mostly they try to get a cut apart from commission.
dharmeshyogi
22 June 2010 at 12:29
Respected Sir,
There are two bodies in a trust. The work of one body has to be approved by the other, but the constitution of the bodies are same i.e. the members of the two bodies are same. Is that possible? even though the it has not been restricted by the bye-laws of the trust.
Please reply to my query in details at the earliest and oblige.
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 21:57
I was working for a school where i had signed a contract to work till 31/3/10.Due to health reason i had to stop in between and joined after a month.I recd the salary i was promised for that month and they had reduced my salary without my knowledge the next month.So i quit in the month of Feb.Now they have sent a notice which i have not recd since i have started working in another school.What is the impact if i dont recieve the notice ? WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP I HAVE TO TAKE?
Baskaran Kanakasabai
21 June 2010 at 21:03
Which is the law concerning false certification and the penal provisions regarding such certification?
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 17:03
HI,I APPLIED FOR SOME INFORMATION IN THE GOVT. DEPTT.IN MY DISTT. ,BUT THEY DID NOT PROVIDED THE INFO. EVEN AFTER THE 30 DAYS,NOW WHAT SHOULD I DO AND WHAT IS PENALTY FOR THE CONCERNED OFFICER?
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 15:20
Sir,
In a case a public officer has put his signature on a record on a date on which he even had not joined the office. This happened due to manipulation of the record in one day. regarding that I need some information like -
On which date he joined the office?
Apart from this shall I ask whether that signature belong to him?
Are these questions correct or I need anything else to ask. Plz. suggest me. I will remain obliged. Thanking all of U.
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 11:12
Hello Everyone,
I am getting calls from some village mens regularly from 2 days. Most of there statements are not understandable but from some of there sentences which I understood I came to know that they are convicting me for some of their stolen mobile which I haven't, and even not ever dreamt of.
I am a very busy person and some what popular in my city, I hardly get time putting my mind in these things. But these calls are really disturbing me. What can be done in such scenario, can I file a police case against them as they alleging me for a deed that I have not committed.
Jagadeesh Kumar V
21 June 2010 at 08:14
whether any bar in law to carry passenger/agricultural employees in tractor/trailer? if carry passenger what is effect if accident occurred.
Anonymous
21 June 2010 at 00:11
Respected Members, I am an advocate, I want an advice for appeal against the National Commission’s order in Supreme Court, Kindly give me fare advice for my own consumer case mentioned below…
Case: - The case is regarding mutation of the my late father’s property which comes under leasehold land Port Trust working under central Govt. for Ministry of Commerce and is managed by a Port Trust with a Chairman as its head.
After completing the due process we have been given permission for transfer from the port trust, and we have made the sale deed on 23/08/2002 of the property including the tenanted portion of the property, copy of the same was sent to trust for mutation in their record but the trust is denying the mutation with the reason that “the civil suit is pending regarding that property in the court between the old landlord (from whom we have purchased the property) and the tenant, so we can mutate the plot after the disposal of the same.” Moreover neither we nor port trust is the party in the suit pending before the court, and tenanted portion is also mentioned in the lease deed with which we have purchased the property.
Against such reply of the trust we have filled complaint for mutation of the property on 08/03/2006 under section 2 d (ii) of Consumer Protection Act, on the ground of consumer “as beneficiary of such services other than the person who hires the services for consideration paid”, as the transfer fees is being paid by us as purchaser to the trust whereof they have issued receipt in the name of the old lease holder vendor.
Consumer Protection Act
section 2 d (ii) [Hires or avails of] any services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such services other then the person who 8[hires or avails of] the services for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person [but does not include a person wo avails of such services for any commercial purpose];
Where An fair and justified order has been passed in our favor from District Consumer Forum the opposite party filled an appeal in state commission, where though legally all points were in our favor, but somehow state commission has issued order against us, while giving reason “the party in the suit cannot be said to be consumer”, due to new plea being taken up by the respondent’s lawyer. I cannot understand that the how state commission can issue such an order on the ground that we cannot be considered as a “consumer”, when the Dist. Consumer Forum has admitted our complain and after looking towards the fact has justified the matter in our favor?
Then after we have filed an appeal before the National Commission, where the National Commission has not looked into the fact of the matter, dismissed the appeal on its admission date itself, without looking towards the documentary proofs, citations & Legal aspects being taken up by us in the state commission. It just relied on the state commission’s order on only one point that “the party in the suit cannot be said to be consumer”. Then we filled review petition before the national commission again to get it justified again, but It was again dismissed by the commission with reason that “ petitioner seek to reargue the matter, which is not the scope of a review petition”.
So, I need an advice whether the ground I have taken for the above matter is right? And what step I should take now for the above matter……
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
convert black money into white
i have 1 crore cash all black money. how can i transfer into my bank AC and convert it into white.Tell me d charges also plzz