Anonymous
06 July 2010 at 18:08
Sirs
The suit was in Kerala court u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. It was a cheque dishonoured case. The Respondent was ordered to pay Rs.1,95,000/- The Judgment copy was received by the advocate on 24.05.2010 and sent to the Respondent in Chennai only on 05.07.2010 (dt.of receipt). The respondent is willing to pay. I would like to know the time limit permissible to pay such amount.
Thanks.
Anonymous
06 July 2010 at 13:14
iam a student of llb.. looking for internship in hyderabad , andhra pradesh .... could any one help me????
Baskaran Kanakasabai
06 July 2010 at 12:41
Which law prescribes or defines as to whether the effects of amendment in any law are to be prospective or retrospective in application?
Anonymous
06 July 2010 at 09:47
Sir,
I enroled yesterday as a lawyer with great expectation.but there is a problom regrarding my practice as a lawyer. The all india bar test is hag like the sward of democlis. if there is any legal remady to overcome this test .
Anonymous
05 July 2010 at 16:00
Some days back we did a document . The other party brought it to us in typed format on a stamp paper.
There were many mistakes and corrections and additions.We wrote by hand by putting whitener and on wrong words on the space above or aside.
The lawyer took everywhere our signs .
Now I am confused ! We have given many signs on one document , the other party may write any thing in that document in front of signs .
Let me what is the exact legal method of making corrections in legal documents? Let me know should we write what we have corrected in separate clause ? or how to document how many corrections/ additions are there in our final typed document ?
So that any other party will be not able to add more things in it .
Anonymous
05 July 2010 at 15:55
What does civil application in a high court?
What does special civil application in a high court?
nagarajupatro
05 July 2010 at 14:32
without any partnership deed some persons doing cable tv business every one invested any paying monthly charges to operating room in which they are partners the same was entered in a book.firm is un-registered.suddenly 6 of them avoided the other and entered into agreement with another registered firm.the sufferer has no documentary proof. tactfully the 6persons created a doucument with the signature of the sufferer(fabricated)that the sufferer has left his share in business and account was settled(without mentioning the amount and the same they spreaded in the public. the sufferer issued a notice stating that the acts of 6are wrong and against to their oral agreement/contract, the document was fabricated one and the spreading such rumors are defamatory and the agreement of those 6with other purchaser is not valid and against to their mutual terms. Now he wanted to do business in his own with the help of his friends, but the then partners threating /obstructing to do so. Police said they won't interfere. the sufferer wants to approach the court. At this stage how he can get justice in his favour? under which law? which provision? court fee? what documents required to prove his case in his favour? process of taking steps.
Note: in a document along with all his partners he signed in paper(declaration to the representatives of a channel), the same he can get from the Local consumers associating which mediated the dispute then.
nagarajupatro
05 July 2010 at 14:05
hai all the members
can any one say the similar site as lawyersclubindia.com which can be more easier to get more answers immediately
Anonymous
04 July 2010 at 23:50
Dear raj kumar g
I would like to draw your attention on the fact that the property which I have inherited was self acquired by my uncle in 1989 and the unregistered will is type written on the stamp paper of 2 Rs on the back of which the purchase date of the stamp paper is mentioned as oct 1993 and my uncle passed away in march 1994 .Does this fact make my side any heavier
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
filling of vakalatnama
hello all learned experts
in the civil matter of MACT IN THE HIGH COURT FIRST APPELA BY THE MISTAKE I PRODUCED THE TWO VAKALAT NAMA FIRST FOR THE RESPONDENT AND ANOTHER FOR THE OWNER OF THE VEHCILE THEY BOTH ARE AGAINST EACH OTHER IT WAS MY BONAFIDE MISTAKE NOW WHAT I SHOULD DO FOR THE WITH DRAW THE VAKALAT NAMA WHAT IS ANY KIND OF OFFENCE AS PER THE ADVOCATE ACT AND COURT CAN TAKE ACTION AGIANST ME AS PER LAW IF I DECLARE THAT IT WAS BONAFIDE MISTAKE CONTEMPT OF COURT IS NECECSSARY PLS HELP ME URGENT