Anonymous
25 August 2010 at 20:48
Hi, I want to ask that can a company (regd.private) run an educational course without affiliation to any govt.authority or even without obtaining NOC from concerned state govt
Ajit
25 August 2010 at 11:43
In case we get some information under RTI then how can we ascertain that information provided by the information officer is correct and true?In case the information is false or untrue then what is the remedy and to whom we can approach?and is there is any penalty/punishment for giving false information?
Arvind Singh Chauhan
25 August 2010 at 09:37
Learned seniors please go through my query-
posted as-
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/HOW-CAN-WE-HELP--93726.asp
After your advice I issued notice of 80 cpc. Now ITBP is requiring succession certificate. From kailash Ram's brother,as his name is not entered in Kailash Ram's service book.
Letter of ITBP says that send the succession certificate that he is the successor of Kailash Ram and Devki Devi( Mother of Kailash Ram).
Sir if I apply for succession certificate whether Kailash Ram's wife shall be a party and whether she can object though she has remarried.?
It is to be noted here that ITBP has not mentioned in letter the amount, to be paid on which I can seek Succession certificate. I therefore again requesting ITBP to send the detail of amount to be paid to soldiers brother as arrears that I can apply for succession certificate.
gopal dutt vyas
25 August 2010 at 09:04
WHETHER A CLAIM PETITION IS MAINTAINABLE WHERE VICTIM HIMSELF IS VICTIMIZER AND WHETHER OWNER OR INSURANCE COMPANY IS LIABLE TO PLEAD AND PROVE THAT VICTIM HIMSELF IS THE VICTIMIZER TO AVOID LIABILITY ?
Anonymous
24 August 2010 at 11:23
SIR I WANT TO KNOW THAT IS THERE ANY LAW WHICH CAN BE USED AGAINST MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT. THE LAW IS PASSED IN LOK SABHA AND RAJYA SABHA BY M.PS WHICH ARE ELECTED BY CITIZENS OF INDIA.AND AFTER THAT IT IS SIGNED BY PRESIDENT. IF PRESIDENT DOES NOT SIGNED IT IS AGAIN SENT IN PARLIAMENT FOR DISCUSSION. NOW, PRESIDENT IS BOUND TO SIGNED IT.
NOW REVISING THE SALARY OF M.PS 3 TIMES BUT THEY WANT IT FIVE TIMES THIS CAN BE EASILY BE PASSED IN PARLIAMENT BECAUSE THIS IS IN FAVOUR OF M.PS. IF IT IS NOT SIGNED BY PRESIDENT THIS WILL AGAIN SENT IN PARLIAMENT ,NOW AFTER THIS PRESIDENT HAVE TO SIGNED IT.
B. Madhuranthakan
24 August 2010 at 11:11
I am a Central Government employee. We (my mom, brother and sister) own an Ancestral Property. Is it necessary for me to disclose this property in the IMMOVABLE PROPERTY STATEMENT. This statement is to be submitted during the month of January every year.
Anonymous
24 August 2010 at 08:28
If any Female is Filling wrong petition / Affidavite allegating someone either civil or criminal, subsequently proves wrong, what are the implications of that? can we file another cas against her for filling wrong petititon / affidavite and also for damage to my respect in the society?
aditya vadali
22 August 2010 at 19:08
Respected Lawyer's & my seniors,
I have a problem with the garbage dumps on our residing areas (bhel), firstly being a forest area, grass is developing beside the garbage pits, leading snakes come over to the houses. if we have the municipal people coming daily for the collection of garbage can we abolish those garbage pits permanently in our society? pls, help regarding this matter. lots of diseases occurs by these problem.
aditya.
Anonymous
22 August 2010 at 11:05
WHICH ONE IS MORE SERVER TO THE INTERESTS OF RESIDENT OWNERS/LIVERS: A SOCIETY OR COMPANY?. TO MY UNDERSTANDING THE ACCESSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTS STOCK APPRAISAL POWERS ARE MORE VESTED IN SOCIETY THAN COMPANY. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES ARE MORE WITH COMPANY THAN SOCIETY. PLEASE OPINE WITH VALUABLE SUGGESTIONS.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
SOCIETY VS COMPANY IN APARTMENTS
WE ARE IN A APARTMENT IN MULTISTOREYED BLDG,CONSTRUCTED BY BUILDER AND VENDOR TOGETHER. WITHOUT LOCAL AUTHORITY CERTIFICATION FOR COMPLETION,BUILDING WAS HANDED OVER TO A COMPANY FORMED BY VENDOR(ALSO RESIDENT) AND SOME RESIDENTS. UILDER-VENDOR DUO CHARGED RUPEES ONE LAKH EACH FOR MAINTANANCE DEPOSIRT AND HEALTH CLUB MEMBERSHIP.THUS FOR 100FLATS BUILDING RUPEES TWO CRORES ARE LYING WITH THIS DUO,WITH NO INFORMATION ABOUT ITS USE IN BUSINESS OR BANK DEPOSIT. SINCE BLDG WITH SEVERAL DEFICIENCIES IN STRUCTURE IS HANDED OVER TO THIS COMPANY CHAIRED BY VENDOR . MOST OF LIVERS FEEL THAT MAINTANANCE BY COMPANY IS MORE EXPENSIVE AND CUMBERSOME IN APPROACH FOR DAY TO DAY REDRESSAL THAN SOCIETY,THERE IS SIMMERING DISCONTENT. KINDLY GUIDE HOW TO GET IT RECTIFIED.COMPANY IS NOT KEEN FOR MAINTANACE CONTRACT,NOT READY TO PROVIDE SEVERAL BASICS NEEDED FOR ASSURED LIVING IN FLATS. YOUR GUIDANCE SOLICITED