Renu Choudhary
17 September 2010 at 10:57
I had a personal load from Indiabulls (Rs. 38,000) I have already paid Rs.44,000, but they are saying i have to pay Rs. 87,000 for the loan i have taken. I told them for the settlement with Rs.10,000, but they are saying for Rs. 25,000. Now they are harassing and torturing by calling and coming to my home and giving all types of bad words to me and my family. Pl advice on this.
Renu
Anonymous
17 September 2010 at 01:54
Whether a ruling of Supreme Court (2009) is applicable for the District consumer forum for not registering the case which is against the BSNL co. How a consumer redresses his grivience if his landline has been disconnected by the company for non-payment of amount.
whats the essential elements for a start a new law firm.. please guide me.
under R.T.I, can we ask information about any other foreign countries from our external ministory?
..tom..
Anonymous
15 September 2010 at 22:11
Ld counsels,
How many of you agree to the following proposition with regards to the RTI Act and the legal professioanl privilege of a "Government Advocate" under section 126 of Indian Evidence Act.
1. The professioanl privilege is that of the client and not that of a lawyer and is conferred to protect the interests of the client.
2. Under the practical regime for transperancy enacted through RTI Act this privilege is not relevant for Government advocates.
3. The interest of the client in case of Governmet advocate or a pleader is the interest of the government which is already protected amply in the RTI Act subject to exemptions. Hence a government advocate has no "private interests of the client" to protect in order to claim privilege.
4. Therefore Government advocates cannot claim privilege under section 126 of Indian Evidence Act and need not look for the express consent of the client to diclose information as the client itself is under the purview of RTI Act.
5. Any exemption from disclosure of information need to be in accordance with the RTI Act.
Kindly give your dispassionate view on the above proposition.
Thanks
Anonymous
15 September 2010 at 13:12
PLEASE TELL ME ABOUT THE DIFFRENCES BETWEEN COOPERATIVE AND CORPORATE
Dear Experts, is there any ruling or direction by the Supreme court or High Courts to Subordinate Courts that cases involving senior citizens, should be disposed of expeditiously. Thank you.
Anonymous
15 September 2010 at 09:49
Respected all, last night i saw a dreem that Admin has launched a smar IDENTY-CARD & DIRECTRY for all lawyer mambers. However I think that now a days it is basic need to know each other(a scatchy information as-chambar no.&mob.no) of all those lawyers who visit out side court time to time,because so many times we feel strangers. But when we know that in that plce where we are visiting a Respected mamber is waiting forus than the work will become easy,and A HEALTHY RELATION-SHIP WILL ALSO BE DEVELOP. Regarding this topic that how we can start and manage your veluvle views are welcome. and also send a Personnal Massage to My Profile.
see forum-local-urgent for hon'ble lawyers post.
data is there.
sarvesh k sharma 09258044407
from last 1 year I practised as an advocate
Sir now if I look for Jobs what kind of jobs available for me I practsed mostly in labour laws I am associated in civil cases also but I dont have very good command on them so what kind of jobs are good for me
write up for lawyers & law students
Can you plz help me in preparing the write up for the lawyers & law students
kindly send it ASAP
Regards,
Annie