Ajit
01 October 2010 at 11:19
A sub Inspector of Punjab Police was promoted to the rank of inspector of police on adhoc basis with all finacial benefit in his parent department without any outstanding performance.DGP Punjab admitted in writing that under Punjab Police Rule 1934 that there is no provision of adhoc rank.There are 463 sub inspector senior to him.He was not on deputation on any department.On 30-09-2010 he retired in capacity of adhoc but he will be given pension in the rank of Sub Inspector.Whether this act is illegal and if YES under what rules.
Anonymous
01 October 2010 at 10:11
An appeal is pending for hearing at Guwahati High Court since 1975. This is a title suit case for the sebaitship similar to Ayodhya.
Trial court had given verdict in 1975 in favor of the sebait and his family and the opposite party a group of 14 businessmen was denied sebaitship. Opposite party appealed in a bench of Guwahati High Court. This is a voluminous case and should be heard by full bench. This is pending now. Advocate of Sebait requested bench of Guwahati High court for a hearing and conclusion and dispose off of the case. But after giving dates the case always differed to next date and as such 36 years passed.
When the founder sebait died his son was a small child and one shop owner doing business in the shop in the front of the temple plot started looking after the accounts and maintenance as appointed by the founder sebait because this businessman was a friend of founder sebait also, however there is no written evidence for that. When the sebait after growing up when asked for the handover of accounts and documents to him a group of businessmen started a case in lower court for the title suit and one after another they filed more than 30 cases in different courts and fortunately the cases were decided in favor of the sebait. Thereafter these 14 members who formed a committee illegally filled an appeal in the bench of Guwahati high court. The original suit was filled in 1960. The opposite party is more interested in the commercial value of the plot than the temple. It was established by the trial court that temple was founded by the sebait's late father and he was founder sebait. Court has also declared that the land was acquired by the founder sebait. The idols were installed by the founder sebait. The sebaitship inherited to his son and grandsons and family members.
The sebait and his family are not very rich to afford advocates fees etc, whereas the opposite party are rich businessmen. Whereas sebait is now finding it difficult to manage and maintenance of the temple and daily seva puja. Temple is also in bad shape and any day the temple hall made of wood more than 100 years ago may fall.
The family members are still continuing the daily sevapuja and festivals of the deity religiously and with full dedication. Whereas the so called illegally formed committee after starting of the case in 1960 made agreement with the shopkeepers and still collecting the rent and using that money for fighting of the case.
How can the members of sebait family request high court to hear the appeal and dispose the case.
MOHAN ILAYARAJA
30 September 2010 at 22:47
Whether private Banks like HDFC, ICICI etc are covered under RTI. If so under what provisions and Who is the appellate Authority for appeal prevails.
Anonymous
30 September 2010 at 20:03
if some one infected by HIV and if there will be a law preventing him from marriage then will it amounts to violation of human right...?
M/s. Y-not legal services
30 September 2010 at 13:23
Dear friends.. We may be hindu or muslim.. What ever may be the judgement.. This is the request to you who are getting favorable judgement.. Don't celebrate the judgement.. Don't hurt other's religion feels.. Same time this is request to you who are the other side.. No need to vexed with this judgement. If you not satisfied with the judgement mean we have the alternative remedy before our laws.. Please be calm.. We are indians.. Don't break our unity.. No need any more blood marked historys.. Love you india. ..tom..
Anonymous
30 September 2010 at 12:31
Is it legaly possible to settle the case of title suit out of court during the pendency of the case.
Similar to Ayodhya case another case is is pending at Guwahati high court. Case was lounched in 1960 by a group of business men against the Sevait for a temple in the heart of town having a good commercial advantage of the land. The father of the founder sevait died before world war II, when the sevait was a small child and one shopowner doing business in the shop in the front of the temple plot started looking after the accounts and maintance as appointed by the founder sevait becouse this businessman was a freind of founder sebait also., however there is no wrtitten evidence for that. When the sevait after growing up when asked for the handover of accounts and documents to him a group of bessinessmen started a case in lower court for the title suit and one after another they filed more than 30 cases in different courts and fortunately the cases were decided in favour of the sevait. Utimately the District Court gave verdict in 1975. After facing the defeat the businessmen group filed an appeal in high court. This apeal is still pending since than. Opposite party approcesd the sebait as declared by the district court for the out of court settlement. District Judge in his order declaerd thst the lan land is a debotter property and Idols of deity are the owner,and the brhamin is the sebait and his late father founded the temple and other properties with his own mens and money without the help of others. In the out of court settlement The opposite party wants to devide the land into two unequal halves one bigger half for the temple and related buildings and second smaller half for the residential and commercial use of sevait, Opposite party also wants separate RORs for the two halves one in the name of deity and another in the name of sevait - is this possible as an independedent owner.
Can some one give a legal opinion and correct comment on this.
D S Pradhan
Anonymous
30 September 2010 at 02:01
this is in mumbai.
the coop hg socty has filed a case on me for Recovery of Arreares;in 2001. i engaed a lawyer to represent me.the case is at the STAGE of CROSS EXMS. THE said lawyer is not present for last one yr.
In the given cercumstances i may require to defend myself. is it possible ? i;m i supose to give undertaking; if so;guide me accordingly. thanks !
vinod bansal
29 September 2010 at 22:25
R/Experts
In one of my case( consumer complaint against insurance Co.)Complainant has expired and now case is fixed for both parties evidence.Deceased has left behind him his mother and wife(widow)and two sons aged 3 years and 4 years respectively .How Can i proceed/continue my case.Kindly suggest.Thanx
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Counsel or Advocate--any difference ???
In England----they are called Barristers.
In US--------- they are called Attorneys.
In India ------they are called"Advocates"
but
sometimes "Counsel" also.
Is there some difference in "Advocate" and "Counsel" or none ?