sirs,
I would like to get a copy of the following Acts in "WORD" or "PDF" format:
1. THE ABKARI ACT, 1077(KERALA)
2. KERALA CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE
3. KERALA CRIMINAL RULES OF PRACTICE
4. KERALA COURT FEES AND SUIT VALUATION ACT
5.KERALA STAMP ACT
6.HINDU - MUSLIM PERSONAL LAWS
thanking you sirs,
SALIL KUMAR.P
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY
Anonymous
08 April 2011 at 20:22
One of my reletives created a bogus sale agreement of family properties by forging signatures of other coparcners on a stamped papewhich also appears bogus.
It was "created" in 1995(sixteen years back).The other family members came to know about the existance of this agreement only recently.
In that agreement it is mentioned that he received by way of draft No... dt26/10/1995 from ... branch of SBI.Can we get the information about the issue of this dtraft, encahshment etc.by applying
to the SBI.:
1. Where should the RTI application be filed, and addressed to whom?
2. How long should we wait for the reply?
Please enlighten me on the procedure.
Subrahmanyam
08 April 2011 at 20:08
One of my reletives created a bogus sale agreement of family properties by forging signatures of other coparcners.
In that
Anonymous
08 April 2011 at 19:16
My late father had a .32 revolver in his name. I want to apply for transfer of the weapon in my name. Is it mandatory for me to get a No Objection from my living mother. I want to do this to avoid the weapon being transferred into my mother's name as she can then pas it on to her daughters as she has done for landed property for which I intend to litigate.
Thank You
Respected madam/Sir,
I have a question regarding the repairs of the terrace work.I stay on the 3rd floor above it is the open space ie terrace two flats are there on each floor total 8 in a bldg.
My question is.
1. Who is responsible for the repairs (the owner or the co-operative society)
if Society has to do the job then is there written law.
They have said they will pay me half and half amount i have to bear,the total cost for the repairing is coming to 2lac 80 thousand.
I am a middle class person only working person in the house.
Kindly help me out with to get the work done as the whole house is leaking which has spoilt the interior.
Regards
Abhishek
08 April 2011 at 11:03
Dear Sir,
before marriage, My wife`s name was Km.Archana as per Highschool Marksheet and now the day, in PAN no., Votor id and Rashan Card of mine is being Archana Chaturvedi.
So you are requested to advise me what the name has been changed? or not.
I have not issued advertisement in any newspaper for this change.
My wife is completing her study in Nursing and her college principal said for issued a advertisement in any newspapers for name change.
I do not understand what shall i do?
So kindly give me suggestion.
With thanks,
Abhishek
R/Members
I filed claim petition through father of Injured/Minor now petition is fixed for petitioner evidence.Injured is minor (15 yrs old)I want to examine the injured but problem is this being minor his affidavit is not permissible as i think,kindly suggest me affidavit for the purpose of chief filed by minor injured is permissible or not,minor's father is eye witness of this occurence,only his (Father) evidence is sufficient or not.Kindly help
Anonymous
07 April 2011 at 17:25
If I seek detail information, under RTI, about compassionate Appointment for a specific case from CRPF, is it in contravention of Schedule - II of RTI Act? If so and the case is rejected by CRPF on eligibility criterion which was not disclosed rater presented in a manner by CRPF to develop an misleading impression resulting into issuing an undertaking by the applicant to go for no other post but the post eventually rejected on medical groundand can it be trated as human right violation?
Anonymous
07 April 2011 at 16:15
Very Urgent
I, Swarup Modak, an inhabitant of Bidisha Housing of Konnagar, Hooghly and a member of Bidisha Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (in short the ‘Society’), Konnagar, Hooghly. The said membership is duly approved by the Co-operation Directorate, Hooghly Range (Former: Office of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Hooghly).
I purchased one residential flat of 477 sq. ft. at Bidisha Housing Project Ph-II (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Project’), Konnagar Hooghly which is promoted by the West Bengal Housing Board (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Board’), Kolkata.
I have purchased the aforesaid flat after being satisfied the free space of the General Common Areas of the Project. During purchase there was neither any Cycle/Two-Wheeler Stand nor any Flagpole base with sophisticated fence in any place of the General Common Areas of the Project.
An extract is given below from the Sale Deed which is made after purchase of the flat(s).
“The general common areas and facilities provided for the purchasers of flat in the estate mentioned in the Third Schedule hereto shall at all time be held by the purchaser and/or allottee member(s) along with other purchasers of flat in the said project and shall be used and enjoyed by them in common amongst themselves and neither the allottee/occupier nor any other purchaser of any flat in the aforesaid estate shall any time be entitled on any ground whatsoever to make partition or division thereof or to claim to have exclusive right in any manner whatsoever to any portion of such general common areas and facilities/amenities and that the purchaser along with the other purchasers of different flats in the aforesaid estate shall use the said general common areas and facilities/amenities for the purpose for which they are entitled to without hindering or encroaching upon the lawful rights of other purchasers and occupiers of other flats in the said Project.”
The Society has built the following in the free space of the General Common Areas.
1. Cycle/Two-Wheeler Stand – 1 no.
2. Flagpole base with sophisticated fence – 1 no.
The Society discussed regarding the Cycle Stand in several Annual General Body Meetings and the member(s) were agreed to violate the mandatory provision(s) of the Sale Deed whole-heartedly.
An extract from the minutes of 80th Board Meeting of the held on 30-08-2009 is given below:
“…iv) Intimation to W.B. Housing Board
- has already been completed”
The Society intimated to the Board prior to the construction of the Cycle/Two-Wheeler Stand.
The Board, being a party of the Sale Deed, a seller, has helped the Society to violate the mandatory provision(s) of the Sale Deed. The Board did not try to protect my right as I have paid money to them for the said flat as well as the General Common Areas in the Project.
The DRCS (Former ARCS) and the CI, Serampore has put their unauthorised interference by giving permission for construction Cycle Stand in the General Common Areas of the Project. Neither the DRCS nor the CI has spent any money for the said Flat as well as the General Common Areas of the Project nor the said property is their ancestral property.
On 29-12-2009 under ref. Memo No. 2153 M I – 3336 the ARCS issued a letter addressed to the Society as follows:
“...this office of the undersigned is not in a position to accord any sort of permission in this respect right now, because, out of 450 no of existing members of your society (having 540 no. of flats), the no of members likely to be benefitted from the proposed cycle stand is not duly furnished (more precisely, the capacity of the proposed cycle stand is not mentioned).
Now, you are hereby requested to need-ful for submission of this related documents in this regard for further course of action from this end.”
On 30-12-2009 the Society received letter from the ARCS and on the same day under ref. BIDI/Cycle stand in para 4 the Society replied to the ARCS through the CI as follows:
“ 4. Now about the capacity of the proposed stand we may say that the capacity of the stand depends upon the way the cycles are placed. The area of the proposed cycle stand is 110 ft x 8 ft. Our estimate is that around 200 cycles can be placed in the proposed cycle stand.”
Out of the above, the rest which the Secretary of the Society had written in his letter almost was not as per the requirement to the letter of the ARCS. It was a story which the Secretary of the Society manufactured just to influence the ARCS for obtaining sanction for the Cycle/Two-Wheeler Stand in their favour.
On 31-12-2009 under ref. Memo No. 179/09 the CI, Serampore Circle forwarded the letter of the Society along with favourable comments:
“...so that construction work for the cycle stand could be started as early as possible.”
Even she did not try to justify before writing to you whether the reply of the Secretary of Bidisha was in line of your letter.
On 04-01-2010 under ref. Memo No. 21 I – 3336 the ARCS issued a letter addressed to the secretary of the Society with an open permission for construction of cycle stand and the ARCS wrote as follows:
“...you may construct the Cycle Stand provided all the members (and their family) of your society can get the benefit of it irrespective of caste, creed, colour and sex for registering peace and tranquillity within our society.
At the same time, you are also requested to take necessary measures for construction of one or more no. of Cycle Stand for further requirement (if any) to meet up the need as well as demand of the members (General Body) over and above the existing capacity of the proposed Cycle Stand...”
The DRCS and the CI helped the Society directly to violate the mandatory provision(s) of the Sale Deed through applying their Official Power illegally and forcefully.
After getting success from violation of the mandatory provision(s) of the Sale Deed the Society has built one Flagpole base with sophisticated fence in the free space of the Project without any intimation to the concerned.
In the main Site Plan there is no any provision for any type Construction like Cycle/Two-Wheeler Stand and/or Flagpole Base in the free space of General Common Areas of the Project.
There as numbers of unsold flats in the Project which the Board will sale in coming days to his customers where an illegal Cycle Stand and/or a Flagpole base exist.
The aforesaid Cycle/Two-Wheeler Stand will create a serious social problem in the Project. The privacy of family members, especially lady members, of the unsold flats which are attached to Cycle/Two-Wheeler Stand will become completely destroyed. Round the clock all people will move besides their windows. It is impossible to give guarantee that no one will peep through the windows (bedroom/bathroom/kitchen/dining room) of the said flats. They should also have right to use and enjoy the sufficient free space besides their windows like other allottee member(s).
In the Sale Deed the Purchaser is the Society and I am a confirming party.
How should I be able to recover the free space?
Right to information
i have applied for an extract of a station diary from police station. the application was rejected by endorsing that it could not be traced out, so they can not supply it to me. now i want to preferred an appeal against this decision. i want to know the appellate authority of the above forum.