Anonymous
09 July 2011 at 20:09
what is the implications if Respondent has not responded to notice issued by High court on Appeal. The Responded is dead now. Will the High court issue the second notice on legal heirs.
CAN SOCIETY APPROACH TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY AND LEVY PENALTY U/S 101 OF THE MAHARASHTRA CO-OP SOCIETY ACT 1960 FOR RECOVERY OF AMOUNT FOR BUILDING REPAIRING WHICH IS NOT CHARGED IN THE BILL. ONLY VERBAL DEMAND IS RAISED AND 30% OF THE MEMBERS PAID THE AMOUNT? AD HOC AMOUNT OF RS. 20,000/- BASED ON STRUCTURAL AUDITORS REPORT IS DEMANDED. NO BILL IS RAISED.
ALSO CAN THE AUDITOR OF THE SOCIETY RECOMMEND TO LEVY PENALTY FOR NON PAYMENT OF THE ABOVE AMOUNT AND APPROACH TO REGISTRAR U/S 101 FOR RECOVERY OF THE AMOUNT WHICH IS NOT BILLED BY THE SOCIETY?
WILL ANSWER DIFFER UNDER MAHARASHTRA CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY ACT, 1960?
Anonymous
08 July 2011 at 23:16
iam a store manager in the company and when leave the company they promise me to releave my pf money now they cnant even attend my phone and plz give me the proper suggestion what can i do.
Anonymous
08 July 2011 at 22:31
Meri ek teen saal ki ladki hai usko maine ek Play School me rakha hai. Vo pahle 10 din to khush hokar school gai baad me ek deen boli muje school nahi jana hai madam muje marti hai . Maine ye baat Teacher ko batai to usne bola haa maine usko data tha or wall ke samne khada kar diya tha or 5 baar sorry bolne ko kaha usne sorry bolne ko mana kar rahi thi to maine usko mara tha sab teacher or aayaa bhi thi . Teacher ne bola vo apne water bag aage rakhne ko nahi detee hai or bolti hai me apni waterbag kyu doo? Me toilet me bar bar kyu jau ? is tarah samne javab detee hai. Aur muje bola ki we can't tolerate this type of behaviour. Muje iske baare me pls. guide karo ki me teacher / School ke samne kya action le saktahu aur konsa Act lagu hoga. Play School Ek badi aur naam wali School chala rahi hai.
Anonymous
08 July 2011 at 21:35
NOTICE UNDER SECTION 13(2) WAS SERVED ON THE BORROWER BY THE BANK ON 25.08.09. ON 26.09.09 HE FILED OBJECTIONS TO THE TNOTICE. THE BANK FAILED TO GIVE REPLY TO THE SAME WITHIN STIPULATED PERIOD. INSTEAD ISSUED THE SAME NOTICE AGAIN WITH DATE CHANGE ON 23.12.09.
WHAT IS THE STATUS OF EARLIER NOTICE WILL IT BECOME INFRUCTIOUS?
CAN ANOTHER NOTICE BE ISSUED IN SUCH LIKE STIUATIONS, IF SO UNDER WHAT PROVISION OF THE ACT?
WHAT IF THE BORROWER CHALLENGED THE LEGALITY OF THE NOTICE?
WHAT STEPS THE BANK SHOULD TAKE IN SUCH SITUATIONS?
THE BORROWER MOVED TO HIGH COURT CHLLENGING THE VALIDITY. WHAT IS THE DEFENCE BANK SHOULD TAKE? I WANT TO KNOW FROM THE POINT OF BANK.
Anonymous
08 July 2011 at 15:15
Is it mandatory to have Digital Signatures on Computer generated reciepts?
Respected seniors please, is there any guidelines of bar council or SC for the "Protest by lawyers/ strike"?
In what manner bar association should show their protest on a genuine issue, while Supreme court says lawyers can't go on strike.
Anonymous
08 July 2011 at 00:24
I would like to know, whether any Advocate working as a Lawyer in court can also do job in any private company, which is not related to Law ?
Anonymous
07 July 2011 at 23:12
HELLO ALL LEARNED FRIEND
I WOULD LIKE TO APPEAR THE EXAMINATION OF DISTRICT JUDGE OF GUJARAT STATE PLS GIVE ME TIPS FOR SUCH TYPE OF EXAMINATION AND PLS SEND MATERIAL IF YOU HAVE
REGARDS
Securitisation Act
Respected Sir,
I am Dr. Rajkumar Hari Pol, from Karad (Dist-Satara, Maharashatra), I humbly request you to send me the citation or order of Hon'ble High court of Karnataka in which Notification of the Central Government dated 28.01.2003 so far as it is applicable to the co-operative banks is challenged in a writ petition before the Hon'ble High court of Karnataka. Consequently, proceedings initiated by the Malleswaram Co-operative Bank Ltd., against a borrower under Securitisation Act has been stayed. (Please send me this stay order)
Thank you.
My email address :
rajkumarpol@rediffmail.com
Cell : 9850755276