Anonymous
24 July 2011 at 16:58
DEAR EXPERT,
I HAVE QUERY ABOUT THE LEGAL STATUS OF NOMINEE IN RTI ACT 2005.IF APPLICANT APPOINT A THIRD PERSON AS NOMINEE TO COLLECT INFORMATION FROM GOVT. OFFICE THEN IT IS BINDING ON PIO TO PROVIDE IT TO SUCH PERSON OR NOT?
Narayan Roy
23 July 2011 at 20:34
Dear Sirs,
I am an advocate and practicing as a Tax Consultant. As the e-filing of Audited Return of Income Tax has become mandatory through Digital Signature, Please guide e how can I get the Digital Signature Certificate and from which Organization prove the same. Moreover how much time the full procedure requires? Please reply urgently.
manoj kimar jha
23 July 2011 at 18:24
hi sir i want to know about non banking finance company,particularly about compression between different category of NBC
Anonymous
23 July 2011 at 11:59
Please give us a good draft format for early hearing petition to be filed by a 81 year old complainent in NCDRC. The case is of year 2004, The complainent won from both district consumer redressal form and From State commission. Now the case is pending in NCDRC since 2010. This year in march the revision petition was admitted and case has been pending in "List in Due course"
Gagan Souri
22 July 2011 at 22:07
Dear Seniors,
What are the retirement benefits in case of voluntarily retirement of Hindustan Shipyard Limited [A Govt of India Undertaking] Company.
Please enlighten me what i am entitled to get.
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 19:07
1. Whether interim orders can be passed in Sec 9 proceedings.
2. Whether I.A is maintainable in A.OP filed under Sec 9 of Arbitration act.
3. Whether the Court is empowered to order to attach the personal properties of the Parties of the Arbitration agreement which is not to the Subject matter of said agreement
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 18:30
My father the complainent is 81 years old. Since we are appearing in person in the case. Kindly advise how to draft a good application for preponement or early hearing of the case "list in due course"
regards
Dhingra P.S.
22 July 2011 at 16:54
Hi Respected Experts
I am preparing a directory of expert Lawyers/Practitioners, which I intend to place at the LCI for free access, so that even our members may like to contact each other at the time of need to exchange views and get proper advice from each other, or to exchange neighbourhood cases amongst each other belonging to the jurisdiction nearest to one and other.
So, I am attaching a form to be filled in and sent to me for compilation of the said direcory.
Hope members would like to cooperate.
Anonymous
22 July 2011 at 15:40
Govt alloted a land on lease for 99 yrs.
for a Trust. I Tax dept. give exmption.
Munciple corporation give exmption on octrio.
Above mention trust can fall on RTI
TRUST SAID WE ARE NOT APPLICABLE RTI
Is it true? Plz.advise
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Suspension
Learned Members,
Please help solve the problem below:
I joined my service on 4th September, 1996 as a UDC.
I remained absent(un-authorised from 02.01.2001 to 29.09.2001 i.e for 271 days)
I rejoined my duty on 01.10.2001 and applied for Extra ordinary Leave in order to regularise the absence period on 19.10.2001
In contrary, I was suspended instead on 16.04.2002(i.e after 6 months & 15 days of my joining and after 5 months and 28 days of application for the leave of the said absence period)to enquire into unauthorised absence period.
The Inquiry was proposed to be held into the charges of unauthorized absence framed against me as per the procedures to impose Major Penalty under the provision of Rule 14 of Central Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rule, 1965 by the Authority. Accordingly, the inquiry was held as per the procedures to impose Major Penalty.
After the aforesaid inquiry was over, finding no ground for imposing major penalty under any penal provision of the CCS(CCA)Rules, 1965, the suspension was revoked with immediate effect from 27/10/2004 and merely a minor penalty of withholding one periodical increment without any cumulative effect as defined in Sub-rule (iv) of Rule 11 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 was imposed.
Further, the authority ordered that the said period of suspension w.e.f 16/04/2002 to 26/10/2004 in respect of me is not to be treated as on duty for any purpose, which is violative of the Order of the Department of personnel & Training, Govt. of India Order No: G.I, Dept. of Per. & Trg., O.M. No. 11012/15/85-Estt.(A), dated the 3rd December, 1985 wherein it is stated, "where departmental proceedings against a suspended employee for the imposition of a major penalty finally end with the imposition of a minor penalty, the suspension can be said to be wholly unjustified in terms of FR 54-B and the employee concerned should, therefore, be full pay and allowances for the period of suspension by passing a suitable order under FR 54-B"
Now the questions concerning me are:
1. Whether the above circumstances can withstand in the court of law?
2. Where can I find the aforesaid Order of the GOI(I have thoroughly searched in net but to no avail)as the merely citing the order No. as given in SWAMY'S HANDBOOK is not accepted by the court.
3. Is there any ruling of the aforesaid nature.
Kindly help by providing details, if any.
Thanks in anticipation.