DR. HEMANT KUMAR YADAV
05 February 2012 at 07:50
Can someone help me in providing the provisions and relevant case laws, where this is mentioned that Speed Post must be delivered within 24-48 hours from the day of posting ??
Actually there are two cases of mine pending in District Consumer Forum. Both are the cases, where Indian Postal Department had delayed in delivering my SPEED POST. The single difference between the two cases is that one speed post was for inter-state delivery, which was delivered after 5 days from the posting date and the other one is for inter-district delivery, which was delivered after 22 days of posting date.
Now, the Chairman of DCDRF is asking for the provisions and relevant case laws, where this is mentioned that Speed Post must be delivered within 24-48 hours from the day of posting.
I have lost my golden chances to appear in Haryana Civil Services Examination, 2009 and Haryana Judicial Services Examination, 2010. I've taken the judicial coaching and has prepared well for that examinations, but all went in vein due to huge negligence of our country's Postal Department. I'm deeply frustrated from this incident.
PLEASE HELP ME IN THIS MATTER !!
sridhar pasumarthy
04 February 2012 at 15:16
Respected experts,
In an award passed by lok adalath(DLSA)in a complaint filed u/s 138 of NI Act, the following terms were incorporated :-
(1)The Accused agreed to pay an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- to the complainant within 30 days from the date of award failing which the accused is entitled to recover the amount of cheque Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation u/s 357(3) Cr.p.c. and also should undergo three months imprisonment.
(2)In case of default by the accused, the complainant is entitled to recover the said compensation amount by way of filing Crl.m.p.
With the above terms the award was passed.
My question is:-
1. Whether the award passed with the above terms is valid? If so, up to what extent?
2. Whether the complainant is entitled to recover the cheque amount by filing Crl.m.p.? If so, under what provision?
3. Whether the accused should undergo imprisonment in default of payment agreed under the award within the time stipulated?
4.Is there any remedy for the accused to escape from imprisonment and payment of compensation?
VENKATESH HEGDE
04 February 2012 at 13:36
Really I feel very bad about LCI.This type of answers/ behavior is not suit for some of so called "EXPERTs". Please dont do like this.. It will affect your goodwill in LCI.
Please go through this links :
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Right-issue-272846.asp
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Registration-272101.asp
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Investment--267811.asp
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/profile.asp?member_id=149823
gosc
04 February 2012 at 12:12
Please, you may technically remove the “Post As Anonymous [ ] Yes ” field [column] kept / showing in the “Ask a Query” format and make the fields wherever it is required to be filled compulsorily by the person when they post their question in LCI website. It will facilitate the those person’s who are really in need of your free service in one attempt – by s.ram
Pramod Kumar 'Guddu'
04 February 2012 at 11:34
Dear Sir,
We are having granted M.A.4 Licence for storage and utilisation of Methanol (Methyl Alcohol) as a solvent/processing agent in our Bulk drug manufacturing process from herbal material. The product does not contain alcohol which is generally recovered from this process and re-used.
Now the State excise person said the you have to use Methanol (Methyl Alcohol) with mixing colour as per the order of UP State Excise vide 4960-5460/2-805/A/Mi.A./07.03.2010 under Poisonous Rules 1921 –rule 17. They are following the rule of Uttar Pradesh and not having their own rule yet. Other state is not having such rules and exempted for the same.
As our products are herbal in nature and is used in manufacture of drugs/dietary/food /Supplements/injectibles, any trace of external coloring would render our product unfit for human consumption and will no longer be saleable.
You are requested to please help and guide us with suitable circular and notification whereas Other state are not having such rules and exempted for Coloring of Methyl Alcohol for which we shall be very much oblige to you.
We look forward to helping hand.
W/regards,
Pramod Kumar'Guddu'
09897033605
Anonymous
04 February 2012 at 09:51
Dear Sir,
We are having granted M.A.4 Licence for storage and utilisation of Methanol (Methyl Alcohol) as a solvent/processing agent in our Bulk drug manufacturing process from herbal material. The product does not contain alcohol which is generally recovered from this process and re-used.
Now the State excise person said the you have to use Methanol (Methyl Alcohol) with mixing colour as per the order of UP State Excise vide 4960-5460/2-805/A/Mi.A./07.03.2010 under Poisonous Rules 1921 –rule 17. They are following the rule of Uttar Pradesh and not having their own rule yet. Other state is not having such rules and exempted for the same.
As our products are herbal in nature and is used in manufacture of drugs/dietary/food /Supplements/injectibles, any trace of external coloring would render our product unfit for human consumption and will no longer be saleable.
You are requested to please help and guide us with suitable circular and notification whereas Other state are not having such rules and exempted for Coloring of Methyl Alcohol for which we shall be very much oblige to you.
We look forward to helping hand.
W/regards,
gopal dutt vyas
04 February 2012 at 09:32
a witness died after examination in chief and therefore could be cross examined. can his evidence be a basis for conviction ?
Suhas Shivalkar
03 February 2012 at 23:07
Sir,
In the first place I sincerely appreciate the service of free advice rendered by LawyersClubIndia.
My query of the said subject got answered by many Advocates & I am grateful to them for that.
However, many Advocates remarked that they will not answer query posted by an anonymous author. This is perfectly correct; but then why there is an option to 'Post As Anonymous'? we get misled by it.
Adv. ShroffSir wrote 'ALSO NOTE THE REPLY OF ALL EXPERT BE DITTO AS SUGGESTED. LET US HAVE UNIFORM CODE'.
Sir, I humbly disagree. Because variance is the basis of Lawyers profession.
I hope this statement relates to queries of anonymous authors.
Thanks & Regards.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ots
If the borrower get benefit of OTS Scheme and do OTS with bank but don't complied by the borrower and thusOTS gets failed in this case can the borrower approach the bank again for OTS?
Or can the borrower settle the account again even he was being failed in OTS?
Please reply,