Anonymous
04 August 2018 at 09:43
Is there any condition of distance for e way bill within Delhi?
Trixendres
03 August 2018 at 12:53
1 ladka ladki shadi karna chahte hain aur ladka, ladki ki maa ke pita ke bhai ke ladke ke ladke ke ladke ka ladka hai to kya un dono ki undono ki shadi ho sakti hai special hindu marriage act ke tahat aur sapinda relationship me bhi generation upward direction me count ki jaati hain to plzz tell me that they can marry...
SUNIL SHARMA
02 August 2018 at 21:50
hello , I am working as AO in PSU and select in central govt post by upsc through proper noc and having 8 years of experience in psu. Is i am eligible for technical resignation in this case.
Anonymous
02 August 2018 at 12:43
hi
i want to know that what is the definition of obsolete pattern in section 45c of arms act 1959.
as i search on internet i only know about that matchlock, flintlock, hand cannons and cap and ball pistol and revolver fall in this category but they were not 100% sure.
so please can help me in this?
Simranjeet singh
01 August 2018 at 20:36
If a recruitment process is at final stage,that is , document verification has been done and only appointment letters are to be dispatched , Can the recruitment process be cancelled by any means if everything is completed
Anonymous
01 August 2018 at 13:59
i have property inherited,
Query is what is the legal procedure to Gift it, or give it through charity--- which is the best option
Suman Biswas
01 August 2018 at 13:54
Sir,
I am a permanent employee of Govt. of West Bengal. My present basic pay is Rs. 28,620/- (Band pay Rs. 22,020/- and Grade pay Rs. 6,600/-) in the Pay Band-4A (Rs.15,600-42,000/-).
Recently I have got an offer of appointment from a Central Govt. Undertaking Organisation where IDA pattern exist. The organisation while publishing the advertisement last year mentioned the Grade of the post will be E2A in the scale of pay of Rs. 24,900-50,500/- (IDA). Now, they are offering me the post in the scale of pay of Rs. 60,000-1,80,000/- in E3 as the wage revision has taken effect. In their offer letter they have mentioned that my initial basic pay will be Rs.60,000/- i.e. at the base level of the scale. Before appearing the exam I have been given NOC by my parent organisation.
It is also to mention that wage revision in my parent organisation i.e. in the Govt. of West Bengal is yet to finalise.
Now, if the organisation where I am willing to join would have not revised their pay, according to them my basic pay could have been fixed at the bottom of the scale i.e. Rs. 24,900/-, which is lower than what I receive in my parent organisation. Similarly, if my present organisation revise their scale of pay the pay will definitely be higher than Rs. 60,000/-, which they are offering me.
The main contention of the issue is the wage revision in my parent organisation is yet to finalise, whereas wage revision in the organisation where I am willing to join has given effect and therefore though my Basic Pay will increase but I believe I should have been get more than Rs.60,000/-.
Kindly suggest as to whether I can claim for pay protection and if yes, on what basis/how.
Regards,
Suman Biswas
Anonymous
30 July 2018 at 22:17
Hi,
I wanted to know how many times I can change my name in India by giving affidavit to court. I changed my name after marriage but now again want to use the one which the before marriage name. is this possible to again use my father's surname as I was already known by this name earlier.
Thanks
Anonymous
23 July 2018 at 21:35
CAN BOARD OF NOMINEE HOLD LIABLE A CHIEF OFFICER, FOR TRANSACTIONS DONE BY BANK PRIOR TO HIS JOINING BANK.
My friend Ex CEO of Bank C had joined the bank on 1.7.06 and resigned on 16.6.08
There was an arrangement between Bank A in Bhuj and Bank C in Rapar (both in kutch district of Gujarat) that cheques of Bank A , when presented by the account holders of Bank A, to Bank C, it should be honoured for payment after observing a formality of sending Fax to Bank A for confirming by Bank A that they have verified all the aspect of the cheque,including sufficiency of balance and genuineness of drawer’s signature. After verifying as above, Bank A will re-fax confirmation and then Bank C was will make payment. Bank C had opened an account in the name of Bank A, which was being debited by that amount, and at the end of the day, a statement also was being sent by Bank C to Bank A for reconciliation and affording credit to Bank C for all the entries.
During audit by auditors observed that following two entries, payment for which was made by Bank C but credit was not afforded by Bank A.
a) Entry dated 15.5.2006 for Rs.3,15,000/-
b) Entry dated 17.6.2006 for Rs.1,40,000/-
c) Entry dated 13.9.2006 for Rs 90,000/-
In this connection, Board of nominees,Rajkot, initiated actions and sent investigating officer and to submit report in the matter.
Thereafter, neither Bank C or Board of Nominee, sent any notice or communication and passed an order under Sec.93 of Guj.State.co-op.soc.Act.,1961, holding liable three persons viz.,,CEO, Chairman and Cashier/officer for loss incurred to Bank C., and instructed them to make payment of aggregate amount of Rs.5,45,000/-plus Rs.12,000/- being fees and cost towards investigation process.within a period of 30 days from the date of the order.
The communication of the above order was sent to Cashier/officer by Bank C, three days back per their letter dated 18.5.2018 (letter perported to be back dated by Bank C)
My friend Ex-CEO has not received any communication till date.
In this connection, entries in a) and b) are of the period when my friend Ex-CEO, had not joined bank.
As regards third entry c) , my friend Ex-CEO had observed all the formalities as per the arrangement framed by both the banks.
Thereafter, also, since the payment of Rs.90,000/- was not forthcoming from Bank A, Bank C, filed suit against Bank A (suit No.46/209 dtd 31.8.2009).
Under the circumstances, whether my friend Ex-CEO should approach Bank C, or directly approach Tribunal for quashing and setting aside or amending the judgement of Board of Nominees.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Public trust per mptact 1950
I am a member of a Public Trust situated in Mumbai covered under Mumbai Public Trust Act. We have 2 Halls in our owned premises which we have been giving out to Individuals for them to hold their functions- members, their families , neighbors and local persons (for birthdays, weddings, other family functions). In 2015 a new Committee took over and they decided that the Halls could be given out to "so called middlemen" at a near 50 pct discount, to what is charged from members, and these middlemen were allowed to commercially exploit the Halls. This has resulted in a huge loss to the Trust ( member charged 1200/- per hour- after 20 pct discount- against these middlemen being charged approx 750/- per hour). Non members, neighbors and local persons charged 1500/- per hour. These middlemen have in 2016/2017 used the Halls for close to 750 hours and paid the Trust Rs 6.75 lakhs only. Checking what they charged Third parties, advertised in newspapers, magazines, internet, book-my-show, etc show that on an average they have sold tickets (passes, entry coupons, etc) for 300/- per head and have had an average of 50/60 persons attending for a 4-5 hr function. Another way is to offer third parties a package deal of lump sum amount, against payment to the Trust on a per hour basis. Trust is just showing the reduced per hour rate in the books of accounts; but some members allege that much more is paid to the Managing Committee. Is it true that permission must be taken per the Public Trust Act every time the Trust permits a third party to gain from using the Trust premises under pain of heavy penalty of Rs 10,000 (Section 41C). Can some light be thrown on this by your esteemed members.