Learn Trademark Filing Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Admin   15 February 2012 at 13:21

Message from Admin

Dear LCI members/ Experts,




We appreciate your concern in fellow lawyer members/experts of LCI and share your efforts to give a call when they are being defamed by certain persons by posting abusive messages against them. However, we as admin at the first instance cannot prevent any person from making a post, as LCI being an open forum, any person can register and make a post. As admin, our team members can only monitor these posts and delete whichever is found abusive, improper etc. Even in the subject post, our team members have immediately taken note of and deleted the same. Also a report abuse button is provided if you feel that a thread needs immediate attention,kindly use it. To go beyond that is manually not possible.Since we are running a public platform, where there are more than 1.5 lacs members, and legal issues pertaining to disclosure of personal information without the consent of the member concerned are involved, we have to arrive at a decision only on proper legal analysis of the subject issue.


 


Also few competitors sites have been intentionally trying to malign our community by posting/spreading inflammatory messages, let us not try to play into their hands.


 


We sincerely hope that you would understand our position and appreciate the noble cause behind running this community.




Regards

Admin

Anonymous   08 November 2011 at 19:35

Accident claim macp

i met with an accident 12 years back. had major injuries and the case was in the court for more than 12 years.
i got a claim passed but again the ratio of 70: 30 and i am jobless for more than 5 years now. i am an educated person and can start some small business if i get the money.
i was just 35 years old when met with the accident but today i am 47.
what will i do with the money after six years .
and how would i survive till then. is there a law where here are provisions for relaxations in this supreme court( they say) verdict.? can any expert help ?

Anonymous   10 October 2011 at 20:17

Rddfi act 1993

a. Can a bank file an oa for recovery of debt by combining two loans of less than Rs. 10 lacs sanctioned at two different places on two different dates.

b. Can a bank file an oa for recovery of debt when there is no mortgage of any type.

c. power of po in allowing combining of loans of less than 10 lacs.

d. power of in condonig delay of few days/few weeks under limitation act.

Anonymous   07 October 2011 at 19:53

Esi benefit for retired employee

CAN ANY RETIRED EMPLOYEE AVAIL ESI BENEFIT AFTER RETIREMENT?IF SO WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE?

Anonymous   30 September 2011 at 13:15

Company law - divestment from subsidiary company

B is 100% wholly-owned subsidiary Co. of A. now A has decided to divest from its subsidiary Co.

Mr. X, holds 1 share in Company B for benefit of co A to full fill the minimum requirement of members in private Co.

earlier Mr. X has given declaration u/s 187C and Co has intimated same to the ROC.

Now as Co A is divest from Co B and also there will be no beneficial owner of any share, what form and formalities has to be complied?

Regards,

mayilsamy n   29 September 2011 at 18:50

Consent order for public drainage

Should local bodies obtain consent order from the pollution control board under section 25 of The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974, to construct / alter and operate a public drainage system ?

Anonymous   21 September 2011 at 10:29

Citizenship status

AN INDIAN CITIZEN LIVING IN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHO HAS H1 VISA COMES UNDER THE PURVIEW OF INDIAN LAWS FOR A CASE RELATING TO DIVORCE.
IS THERE ANY SUPREME COURT RULING TO THIS EFFECT.
IF THE PERSON FILES AN CASE IN US COURTS IS IT BINDING TO THE SPOUSE LIVING IN INDIA.

sandeep Upadhyay   17 September 2011 at 13:05

Notification of 22/2011 dtd.14.09.11 of cenvat credit rule 2004

Dear all experts

Recently published notification of cenvat credit rule 2004 of c.ex.No22/2011 c.ex(N.T)dtd.14.09.2011.

What is exact interpretation of this notification?if we have paid duty less than one crore during year 2010-11 through cenvat+PLA, We required to now e-file er4,er5 & er6?

Request to all experts give guideline in this matter.It will be useful to all.

Thanks
sandip

Arka Foundation   15 September 2011 at 00:08

Fresh recognition for schools applicable in a.p.?

RTE effect:
City’s private schools must apply afresh for recognition

source:
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/rte-effect-citys-private-schools-must-appl/760907/

RituSharma
Tags : Right to Education Act, DEO Chanchal Singh.
Posted: Fri Mar 11 2011, 01:06 hrs
Chandigarh:

With the implementation of the Right to Education (RTE) Act in Chandigarh, it will be mandatory for all private schools in the city to apply for fresh recognition within three months of the date of implementation. The recognition, to be granted by the UT Education Department, would be allowed on the basis of a self-declaration form, the six-page proforma for which has already been prepared and uploaded on the official website making it accessible to schools.

All schools, irrespective of whether they are already recognised or their recognition or renewal case is under process, as is the case with many private schools, have to apply afresh now. No financial burden has been attached with the recognition process for the schools as the Department has exempted any application fee for it.



Going by the RTE Act implemented on February 11 through a circular released by the office of the District Education Officer (DEO), all private unaided schools would be filling the ‘self declaration-cum-application for grant of recognition of school’ form and submitting it to the DEO within three months.




In this regards, Fresh recognition for aided and
un-aided schools in Andhra Pradesh is applicable?

clarifications please

suresh phadkule   11 September 2011 at 16:46

Bombay public trust act 1950

A unregistered body temporarily formed for religious activities collected donations for religious activities, and then sought to incur this amount on construction of a building to be used for religious activities of a registered religious public trust by mutural agreement with the trust as well as the donors. Can this be done lawfully? Whether this attracts provisions of BPT Act 1950 or any other statute?