SAMIR SHAH
19 July 2013 at 15:44
can a trust having its regd office in gujarat be registered from mumbai at charity comm. office- dharmada ayukta worli. pls guide or is there a state wise law for registration of trust
sumati
16 July 2013 at 10:56
Can i terminate the contract even if there is no termination clause in it? I want to know the supreme court judgments on this provision.
Siddhi Jhunjhunwala
09 July 2013 at 10:18
Can a private Limited company be formed under educational institution? (In other words, can an educational institution own a private limited company?)
If yes, Can the directors or any other person of the donor company be a director in the company owned by educational institution.
Vishwanath
27 June 2013 at 19:44
Dear All,
My car has met with an accident in Bangalore. I have a valid canadian DL and a learner's Indian driving license. As per the Vienna and Geneva Convention on Road Traffic a domestic driving license issued by a contracting party should be recognised by another contracting party. The insurance Company is asking for Authorization of Canadian DL to drive in Karnataka from the concerned RTO. Who is the concerned Authority to authorize? Is it the RTO or some other? KINDLY ADVISE.
Regards,
Vishwanath
v s dhulap
23 June 2013 at 12:43
learned friends,In a case of 70(b) of BTA 1948, a tehsildar passed an order against two brothers respondents (placing actual charge on the first brother) and granted tenancy exparte.(The land bought in 1965 belonged to their father and devolved on the survivors intestate) the first brother (respondents) died even before the proceedings could be started u/s 70(b). (fraudulently claiming tenancy) the order has come against a dead person 8 months after his death ,The deceased's heirs and sisters also got the names entered in the record of rights during the pend ency of the case yet no substitution was preferred by appellants.Respondents appealed in state rev. tribunal against the order meanwhile the tehsildar has passed 32(O) and 32(G) behind back and it was seen that the order under sec 32(O) is issued to the survivors and the sisters for confirming the sale of the land.they were not a party to the case u/s 70(b).Tehsildar was shown and proved about this grave lapse. He has kept it for order.What order can be possibly made by him? Can tehsildar revise the order su-moto(the appellants have not asked for review)-.Case u/s 70(b) is pending in tribunal.Please comment on probabilities.
Prateek
13 June 2013 at 01:36
Sir/ Mam,
I would like to know how much penalty can electricity company can impose if the consumer was using meter of 3 KV and the load during inspection came 9 KV, also inform me the section under which these penalties are given.
Thanks in advance.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
11 June 2013 at 17:33
Dear Friends,
1. THat I KK Agarwal Advocate help in free on oral contract the above persons without any legal charge in their matter and they make promised to me to give the suitable job of above Rs 20000/- in their Supertech company in March 2013 after that on several times I helped both of them in free for the undue and others benefit of the Supertech Company. That After that I made several contacts about them for their promised to get full filled they gave full surety that they will appoint me as a legal or office work in Supertech company at Nodia 58 at the wages above Rs 20000/-.
2. That now today on dated 11-June-2013 they replied that give a job of Rs 12000/- as entry level while they promised me to give a job of Rs above 20000/- suitable to my qualifications. Both are the very shrewd person and manipulative persons and never ever trust on both of them I request everyone please, If any one do trust them then definitely they breach the trust of that person, makes him fool, play with their emotions and looted his valuable time, effort and money in their ulterior motive to get full fill from you.
3. Both are the person who manipulate simple person and take advantage of that person in the desire of their minting the money from supertech in the name of their shrewd dirty work get done from anyone in the desire of getting fixed salary job from Supertech.
Both are getting above Rs Rs 55000/ salary from Supertech while the tanaya Advocate comes at the Supertech office at 4:30 PM and worked upto 7:30 PM. Kindly recognized if they get contact to you with these mobile number which are as:-
J.C.Khera - 09711299925
Tanay Rao Ayde Adv - 9868332215, 9717307337
4. I put all the suffered life contents here so that both person hidden character and his dirty traits be known by all the respectable society person who just accidentally may get contact to anyone or both of them. I hate both of them as they themselves do criminal act of cheating, criminal breach of trust, Mischief, hurt and exploitation etc against an advocate which are clearly defined in IPC.
From
KK Agarwal Advocate
Mb:- 9971443853, 9319365499
satya prakash
30 May 2013 at 20:09
Sir
If a penalty is imposed by adjudicating officer under FSSAI Regulations and appeal needs to be filed before the appellate tribunal within 1 month from receipt of order copy, as provided in FSSAI regulations.
Presently as in most of the states,in AP also there is no appellate tribunal constituted / formed and the formation of same is under process.
What is the alternate remedy for prefering appeal / challenging the orders of adjudicating officer.
Please suggest...
pcjain
19 May 2013 at 11:37
The MCI has revoked the license and passed order on 09.02.13 endorsing the copy to DMC & IMR but doctor continued to practice with impunity.I had informed the MCI, on 28.02.13 and offered documentary evidence in support of my contention but later on MCI changed the date to 09.04.13 & DMC 13.04.13.Can the regulatory authorities change the goal-post after passing the order? Please suggest remedy-pcjain
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Religious trust registered under bpt act 1950
Trust registered under Bombay Public Trust 1951 and not registered under section 12AA income tax act 1961 and received donations say Rs.5 lacs in a year. Now the trust spent only Rs.1 lac out of Rs.5 lacs in a year. Can the trust transfer this Rs.4 lacs into the corpus? Is it compulsory for the trust to spend whole amount received from donation in the same year? Is the balance unspent amount is taxable as the trust is not registered under section 11 and 12 of income tax act?