Guest
27 May 2009 at 11:35
A person purchases a computer through a reputed vendor. The vendor arranges for system installation. After few months, the system informs that the version of operating system is a pirated one and to regularise it, the individual has to pay certain amount online. Due to this error message, the individual's sytem becomes slow and frequently he is being reminded to renew the software.
In such cases, what are the remedies available to the individual?
Can he sue the 'operating system manufacturer' for intruding into his privacy as well as disturbing his peaceful possession of the computer (!)
s.k.goyal
27 May 2009 at 08:53
my clint i.e.a company is trader and supplies materials to other state through transport, now transporter issue bill having service tax no. for transport charges with service tax i.e.11.33% of 25% of chg.
my clint pay the full amt. of bill including service tax to transporter .
please suggest weather my clint is required to get registered for service tax and pay tax directly or can pay to transpoter
thanking you
Kamlesh soni
27 May 2009 at 08:48
Sir I m law graduate from gujarat university. I m a member of bar council of gujarat and practice at mehsana district court. Now i want to settle in mumbai, Can I work there as an advocate?, please give me the idea,can practice as individual?
k.kumar raja
26 May 2009 at 20:54
hello kasrima,tnpsc means "tamilnadu pulic service commission"
GIRISH KUMAR, ADVOCATE
26 May 2009 at 13:06
Sir,
I want to know that
1.can a retired ASJ practicing as advocate in the district court?
2. can he write Ex Aditional Session Judge or Retired Aditional Session Judge after his name in visiting card and latter pad or in other places as an advocate?
Waiting for your reply.
Girish
AVINASH SINGH
25 May 2009 at 16:01
sir, kindly let me know the name of the states where registration with bar council is not compulsory for appearing in the judicial service exam of the respective states.kindly reply as its very urgent
A.Mohamed Thaheer
24 May 2009 at 17:35
Please clarify the procedure for taking cognizance of the 0ffence by the competent Magistrate in the following circumstances:
1. Summon received from the court.
2. Appeared before the Magistrate obliging
the summon on a particular date.
3. Posted on some other day.
4. Appeared. charge sheet was given.
5. Posted for some other day.
6. Appeared, posted for some other day
again, without even putting the primary
question of "Are you guilty or not".
N.B: The reason for postponing the case
further and further till date, is
orally that the special powers to
conduct the case (PersonalDesignata
is yet to be received.
In the above circumstances, Please,
clarify whether we have to presume tnat
the cognizance of the offence is said to
be taken, even before conducting the
preliminary examination by putting the
first and foremost question of asking
"Are you guilty or not".
pratik
24 May 2009 at 15:30
1.)Section 21,22,21(5),24 & 26 of the chartered Accountant Act, 1949 in detail with a good example please.
2.)Section 419, 420,471,472,468 & 469 of the indian penal code 1860.
3.)Section 41 of the maharashtra co-operative socities act,1960 & the most important how we will know that it is a resale or only a sale.
The above matter is important for a case law pending in court so please help.
Member (Account Deleted)
24 May 2009 at 09:39
If a person has made nominee as his wife in bank Fd and if in his will he clearly states that his all Bank Fd should be transfered to his son.
Now who will apropriate toclaim for the Fd Amount?
(It is just illusionary question to clear my concept related to will and nomination)
Thanks in advance
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
case law
Can anyone give me this case law
B.M.Malani vs CIt ITR 306.
alsi circular 530 dated 06.03.1989 read with circular 589 dated 16.01.1991.
it is in relation with interest waiver under section 220 of income tax act.
can anyone explain in a simpl way what this section and case conveys