s k majumdar
21 September 2009 at 17:23
Dear sir
i)My daughter had taken her two wheeler (TVS scooty)from Jamshedpur(Jharkhand State) to Nagpur(Maharashtra) with valid NOC from jamshedpur RTO four years back.
ii)She wants to bring back her scooty from Nagpur to Jamshedpur Since she is going to complete the B.Tech course in March 2010
iii)May i request u the formalities to be completed by her for getting the scooter transferred to her home state from maharastra.
Thanx and regards
S.K.Majumdar
Asst.Manager(Internal audit)
riven
Sumir
20 September 2009 at 23:58
Does the act of displaying, in public, the name of defaulters in notice displayed in notice board by Hoousing Co Operative societies constitute defamation?riven
Pankaj
20 September 2009 at 19:07
Its been abt 18 months that the builder has handed over the pocession to the residents, however till date the society has not been formed by him.. also the builder collects the maintence amounts by cheque favouring the society (which is not formed)
Can you please adv what action can be taken or can the builder be compelled by the residents to form the society immediatelyriven
A.P.Rajagopal
20 September 2009 at 13:40
hello sir
this is very urgent . i am the member of a recreation club for the past 10 months and the probation period for the same is 1 year. the secy of the club who has a personal enemity on me, for no reason terminated me by convening the executive committee. no notice has been served on me and no complaint against has been recd from any member. does a stay order on termination can be got .
ap. rajagopal
riven
emveeemvee
20 September 2009 at 02:24
Is there provision to have stay order from hi court against possession notice given by the Bank (under sarfaresi act ) with eviction order from CJM court and also for police protection ?riven
Sumit Lal
19 September 2009 at 22:29
In a given case, the District Consumer Forum has passed/pronounced a judgment in the month of June 2009 in presence of the lawyer for the respective parties.
The lawyer for the aggrieved party has obtained a certified copy of the order and sent the same to its Client.
The judgment has not been communicated by the district forum to the aggrieved party till date.
In the above circumstance, whether the proposed appeal before the State Commissionn will be time barred?riven
Member (Account Deleted)
19 September 2009 at 19:23
An agricultural field was sold by the original owner in 1990. The name of original owner exists on 7/12 extract even today. The builder who purchased the land developed it into layout i.e. plots. But did not obtain non agricultural assessment or town planning sanction. Around year 2000 the builder sold the plots to various persons. Now in 2002 land acquisition proceedings started where this land was situated. In the year 2007 the said proceedings culminated in reference under section 30 of land acquisition act. The plot owners are unaware of all these developments. The original owners have not filed reference under section 18. The builder has filed an objectioin in section 30 proceedings. The matter is pending since then in court. Now what is the remedy available with plot owners who came to know about these developments when they tried to mutate their names in 2009. Can they file reference under sec. 18 or file 1(10) c.p.c. application in sec. 30 proceedings. Or file civil suit against original owners and builder.riven
Dr C Suresh
19 September 2009 at 17:25
Can certiified copies of govt office documents obtained under RTI Act be used as evidence in court ?riven
Member (Account Deleted)
19 September 2009 at 14:02
September 19,2009
Congress does not rule out action against Tharoor New Delhi
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh last night described Shashi Tharoor's comments on economy class travel as a"joke" even as the Congress indicated action against the Minister.
Asked about the controversy surrounding the"cattle class" remarks of the Minister of State for External Affairs regarding the economy class travel by ministers in furtherance of government's austerity measures, Singh told reporters,"it was a joke". As the storm over his remarks gathered momentum, the Congress party appeared to be unimpressed by Tharoor's apology as it did not rule out action against him and virtually approved Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot's statement seeking his resignation.
" Congress party condemns what Tharoor had said.The party will take whatever action is appropriate and necessary at an appropriate time," Party spokesperson Manish Tewari told reporters here as the controversy surrounding his remarks snowballed further.
On Gehlot's demand for resignation of Tharoor, Tewari said,"It is natural Obviously when you have statements like this, there are bound to be reactions." Gehlot had said yesterday that it was unfortunate and unbecoming on Tharoor's part to make such"irresponsible" comments and he should tender his resignation.
-----------
Please comment
riven
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
DRC act EVECTION under Section (14)(e)
sir in Jan 2009 i deposited rent of Shop Rs40/Pm for 3yrs as demanded by landlord inthe court.he was demanding increase of 10% from 30 days after recieving notice i.e 12.12.09.I send increased rent for next one yr. through MO but he refused to accept.
now on May 2009 he filed for evection underbonafied use DRC Act(14)(e).He has taken plea that he needs shop for himself as he is senior citizen.and telling we are not using shop and attached Electricty bill with 0 unit as i am not using electrtict
Pls helpriven