Anonymous
10 July 2010 at 13:59
in the code of criminal procedure 1973 the definition of charge isplease explain this line
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 21:38
what if a person issues a cheque but does not have a bank account at the time of making it.. will it come under 138 n.i.a.?? please reply in detail??
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 21:35
what section will be applied on a person who have given the cheque to someone but before the date he has closed his account ?? will it come under 138 n.i.a. or cheating??reply asap??
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 21:20
where to find format for all legal documents in this site.??.plz reply asap
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 18:02
As per RBI rules, for one time settlement of loan account what benefits can one get (e.g. interest waive,penalty waive)and can we ask for some duration.
Amarnath chakravarty
09 July 2010 at 12:17
Sir I want to do LLM from distance learning plase suggest me from where I can do that because of my busy shedule I can't done LLM from regular course if experts will guide me I am very greatful to you
Anonymous
09 July 2010 at 02:49
I had appointed a lawyer for purposes of obtaining a probate. The court fee stamp amount of Rs 75000/- was paid in advance at the lawyer's request in February 2009. The lawyer filed the petition after seven months on 18 September 2009.
The delay was because of various excuzes the lawyer gave from time to time. My query is that the lawyer was in custody of the court fee stamp amount of Rs 75000 for seven months. I would like to know if I am entitled to interest on that amount which the lawyer held on to from the time it was paid to her until the time she filed the petition.
Many jurisdictions in other countries impose an obligation on lawyers to ensure that client funds held for long periods are placed in interest bearing accounts in banks and the client is entitled to all the interest earned thereon. Failure to do this is misconduct on the part of the advocate.
For your information, I had suggested while appointing the lawyer that I would pay a portion of the legal fees to start mobilizing the work. However, the lawyer insisted that in addition t
I had appointed a lawyer for purposes of obtaining a probate. The court fee stamp amount of Rs 75000/- was paid in advance at the lawyer's request in February 2009. The lawyer filed the petition for seven months later on 18 September 2009.
The delay was because of various excuzes the lawyer gave from time to time. My query is that the lawyer was in custody of the court fee stamp amount of Rs 75000 for seven months. I would like to know if I am entitled to interest on that amount which she held on to from the time it was paid to her until the time she filed the petition.
Many jurisdictions in other countries impose an obligation on lawyers to ensure that client funds held for long periods are placed in interest bearing accounts in banks and the client is entitled to all the interest earned thereon. Failure to do this is misconduct on the part of the advocate.
For your information, I had suggested while appointing the lawyer that I would pay a portion of the legal fees to start mobilizing the work. However, the lawyer insisted that in addition to the advance of legal fees, I must also pay the court fee stamp amount up front. Thereafter, the lawyer held on to this amount for seven months.
I would also appreciate if you could inform me if there is a scale of fees, which the lawyers have to adhere to when filing petitions for LA/Probate and obtaining the orders.
o the advance of legal fees, I must also pay the court fee stamp amount up front. Thereafter, the lawyer held on to this amount for seven months.
I would also appreciate if you could inform me if there is a scale of fees, which the lawyers have to adhere to when filing petitions for LA/Probate and obtaining the orders.
Baskaran Kanakasabai
08 July 2010 at 23:20
Acknowledgement
The primary objective of the presentation titled “The flaw in the law” is to get the LA Act, 1894 amended in respect of addition of a section to that law to prescribe for the compulsory registrability of the notification u/s 4 (1).
The proposed Land Titling Bill 2010 of the Govt. of India, proposes the very same point .
Therefore, I consider it time now to acknowledge the valuable help and support rendered by
Sri. R.K.Makkad, Sri. Niranjan, Sri.Aravindan s/o Ganesan, Ms.Parveen Agarwal ,Sri. Assumiki, Sri. Y.V.Vishweshvar Rao, Sri.Kiran Kumar, Sri.A.V.Vishal,Smt.Rakhi Budhiraja, Sri.Rajeev, Ms.UmaParameswaran, Sri.Devajyoti Barman, ,Sri.Bagwat Patil, ,Sri.Arup Kumar Gupta,Sri.Ram Samudre, , Sri.ShasiKumar, Sri.Chanchal Nag Chowdhury, Sri.Pawan Sharma,Sri.Parthasarathi Loganathan, Sri.SKJ,Ms.Archana,Sri.B.K.Raghavendra Rao,Sri.Daksh,Ms.RuchiGupta,Sri.SivaSubramanian,Sri.MuraliKrishna,Sri.MukulAggarwal,Sri.VirendarPankaj,Sri.K.C.Suresh,Sri.Mahendrakumar,Sri.Kamaraj Bharathy and others
in the process of clarification of my doubts and thus towards the structure of my presentation titled “the Flaw in the Law”
Though the extent of contribution ranges from the low to high on a scale of 1 to 1000, I sincerely thank each and every one.
If there is one person to be mentioned in isolation by virtue of maximum contribution, it is none other than Sri.R.K.Makkad.
I thank the Supreme Courts of the United Kingdom,Singapore, Australia, and NewZealand, the U.K.Law Commission, and Mrs Ang Moo San of Singapore Land Authority for their kind and express contribution in this regard.
I also thank Sri. S.V.Nahar and Sri.Sudershan Goel of lawguru.com in this regard.
My special thanks should go to the administration of lawyersclubindia.com and lawguru.com and the inventor of internet for providing the plat form to materialize the whole 3 months old story.
If I had left out some one’s name in the list of contributors, kindly pardon me.
Thank you all, Ladies and Gentlemen!
Anonymous
08 July 2010 at 20:33
dear sir, iam satyanarayana from rajahmundry, east godavari district, andhra radesh,
sir, i have debts of nearly five lakhs (500,000) recently ,i transferred my property as a gift deed to my wife,mother,sister.now can i apply for ip.is ip applicable to the banks or not.pl.give me good suggestion
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
code of criminal procedure ,1973
the definiton of charge in cr.p.c is "charge includes any head of charge when the charge contains more than one" please explain this line in simple language