Anonymous
22 October 2018 at 17:30
Dear Sir,
I am working in a CHA Firm, we dispatched material from Nahava Sheva to panoli (Gujrat) while generating E way bill the transporter given a vehicle No.MH06AQ0844, but material dispatched through vehcile no is MH46AF4164, but next day we came to know that vehicle number is changed and we updated the correct vehicle number in E way bill portal, but vehicle reached at maharashtra boarder, when officer check the eway bill he came to know that vehicle number changed, for this he charged us 18% IGST and 18% penalty on imported goods which we already paid to customs, again he charged us 18% IGST, he issued us memo in this matter, Total amount he charged of Rs.27,35,000/- Penalty we can understand but why we paying doubble IGST @18% Which we already paid to custom.all the customs paper paid Bill of Entry challan are ok, now that officer dont understand is he doing right way, please help us in this matter what we supposed to do , our party is suffering from this, its a small mismatch in vehicle no. requesting you please reply me on this matter, waiting - Sarika
MD Fasial
18 October 2018 at 15:55
Sir
1.We are Government Civil Work Contractor. We do contracts in UP Housing Board, PWD, UPRNN, SKNN etc.
2. My assessing authority imposing service tax demand on advance received during service tax regime from UP Awas Vikas Parishad against bank guarantee (on same bank guarantee we paid Margin money or Bank charges for the same).
3. Service Tax department making point that 10 Crore which i received as mobilizations against B.G. is advance for my work and UPAVP charged TDS on the same.
4. We are opposing that UPAVP provide mobilization advance against B.G. and deducted from our 10 running bills. So liability under the provision of Point of taxation of service tax will not be charged because we take it as loan and we repaid in 10 running bill in a row.
Please enlighten us on above points
thanks & regards
Advocate
Faisal
7565999957
DINESH SATIJA
17 October 2018 at 20:40
by on 17 October 2018
CAN A SOCIETY WHICH HAS BEEN EXEMPTED FROM THE PAYMENT OF INCOME TAX AND SERVICE TAX AS WELL BE AUDITED BY CAG. THE TOTAL AMOUNT SAVED BY THE SOCIETY ON ACCOUNT OF INCOME TAX AND SERVICE TAX PER YEAR IS AROUND INR 150 CR.
Anonymous
13 October 2018 at 00:36
I want to pursue Taxation law as my field and currently persuing llb . Please tell how to proceed in order to be a great earning taxation lawyer.
Gurwinder
06 October 2018 at 10:07
dear sir one of my supplier has not filed his gstr-3b & gstr-1 since april-18.
he has issued us tax invoice & we have claim input on that basis.
we asked him to file return & deposited tax then he said he will do soon.
what should i do now.? please help
Shray Narula
03 October 2018 at 19:05
How can i claim homeloan tax rebate where my wife is main applicant and I'm co applicant,we both will pay the monthly EMI but my wife is the sole owner of property. ?
Senthil R
03 October 2018 at 15:28
Dear Expert
Kindly send me a resolution format for new trustee appointment draft.
Thanks & Regards
Rahul
26 September 2018 at 01:11
I had received an IT scrutiny notice us 143(2) in my email on 19th Dec 2017 for AY 2016-17.
The notice was dated 24/08/2017 and gave me time till 05/09/2017 to reply. But, I received the notice only on 19/12/2017. Since, it was a wrong time lapsed notice and no e-proceedings were pending in my e-filing account, I didn't reply to the notice last time.
Again, I have received 2 notices from two different jurisdictional IT AO. One notice was under section 142(1) dated 14th Sep 2018 and gave me time till 20th Sep 2018 to reply. There was no e-proceedings for this notice. Again I received one more notice u/s 143(2) on 17th Sep 2018 and has given me time till 2nd Oct 2018 to reply. This time, there is an e-proceeding for the same(sec 143(2) notice).
My query is,
1) Can I ignore the time lapsed 143(2) notice? What are the implications?
2) What are the provisions of Sec 292BB in this case, since I have received time barred 142(1) / 143(2) notices. Should I raise an objection to the time barred notice now, before assessment completion or I can ignore the notice now and raise the objection later?
3) What can be done, if I get notice again u/s 148 later?
Please clarify these queries.
Thanks,
Rahul
Maheshvjti
24 September 2018 at 21:40
Hi,
I have a query related to Tax exemption(FY17-18) on Home Loan Interest for rented flat. I understand that
In case of non-self occupied property, the interest paid is reduced from the Rent gained to arrive at the Income/loss from House Property. In case the Interest paid is more than the Rent earned it will result in Loss from House Property. This Loss is allowed to be set-off with Income from any other head.
The Finance Act 2017 announced on 1st Feb 2017 has put a restriction to the maximum amount of Loss under head House Property that can be set-off from other heads of Income. From Financial Year 2017-18 onwards, Loss of a maximum of Rs. 2 Lakhs is allowed to be set-off with Income from other heads. The amount which is not set-off shall be carried forward to future years.
Is this 2 Lakhs ( Maximum limited loss) further reduced from Rent gained to arrive at the Income/loss from House Property?
Your prompt reply is awaited.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Whether buyer has right to block payment gst unpaid
Dear sirs, as far as I know, a buyer can request or issue notice to seller to file Gstr1 to claim buyer's itc. Inspite of our prompt filling of gstr1a company has blocked our payment claiming we have not filed Gstr3b. Is it appropriate? Do they have rights?