Anonymous
04 December 2009 at 01:48
What is the minor age property law. When I was 11 years old my maternal uncle ( real brother of my mother )purchased a property on my name. Now Iam 48 years old. My uncle purcahsed this property wish of my deceased mother at that time my mother was cancer patient) this property was purcahsed in 1974 and my maternal uncle was issueless till his death. After the 14 days of death my maternal uncle My father file a suit of benami that the property was purcashed by them and attached the forged document of forged gift deed which is not registered. During the evidence my father failed to proof.cooperative housing society submit reply as defendant No. 2 in court that gift deed is forged in society these document were not submit in society. Last year my father died. My father failed to proof benami. Now the case on arguments please advise me and send me some case laws to help me in this case
Anonymous
03 December 2009 at 21:39
Sir,I took 4 lac cash from relative in 2007 april to buy flat for me.I bought flat in my name.When i took cash,i had signed agreement on bond paper with my relative that in 2 yrs time if i failed to return 4 lac cash then he will buy my flat at total 9 lac rs & bal amount of 5 lac will b paid by my relative to me..The bond paper agreement was not rgistered.Now i am unable to pay him 4 lacs.I need another 3 yrs to pay back with bank interest & dont want to sell the flat.Also relative is not ready for this term....CAN HE SUE ME ON THAT BOND PAPER signed by me with 2witness under any law....Pl advice me..I wld b gr8ful to u.
Anonymous
03 December 2009 at 19:05
In a suit for permanent injunction the Delhi court restrained defendants from evicting or dispossessing the plaintiff from his floor without following due process of law and also directed not to sell, tfr, assign and creatge third party interest in the suit property. Now I intend to file partition suit. Therefore are three legal shareholder including plaintiff. Please guide me on the following points:-
1. The cost of 1/3 share of plaintiff i.e.suit valuation comes to Rs.15 lacs, Can I file this suit in district judge/ADJ court in Delhi as the property situated in Delhi ?
2. Whether I can decrease the suit valuation or not ?
3. What is the procedure to seek relief for stay on the whole property till finalisation of partition suit and can I club both the issues and pray for the same in the court ?
Anonymous
03 December 2009 at 18:28
I had signed an agreement of sale of a house for Rs. 15 lakhs as buyer. I paid Rs. 5 lakhs as advance. In the agreement it is written that the remaining amount should be paid within 30 days from the date of agreement. The 30 days period is over, but, I am not able to pay the remaining 10 lakhs. What will happen now? Will the builder take my advance money and cancel the agreement?
Rameshchandran
03 December 2009 at 15:26
I am a member of agriculture family and i got a certificate from revenue authority with regard to that effect also.
I purchase some agriculture land got it registered in my name and thereafter i was served with a notice from Assistant Commissioner Revenue, that my registration is going to be cancelled and given a notice under section 79 A&B of the land reforms act. Actually i wanted to defend this case by showing that i have purchased the land from my income. But the authority insist that they are taking into consideration of the income of my family.
Can you please provide some citation to justify my contention that the i have purchased the said land from my income and that only take into consideration other than family income.
Please help me by providing your valuable advise as well as some important judgements in this context.
With regards,
RAMESH CHANDRAN.S
Anonymous
03 December 2009 at 15:25
I am a member of agriculture family and i got a certificate from revenue authority with regard to that effect also.
I purchase some agriculture land got it registered in my name and thereafter i was served with a notice from Assistant Commissioner Revenue, that my registration is going to be cancelled and given a notice under section 79 A&B of the land reforms act. Actually i wanted to defend this case by showing that i have purchased the land from my income. But the authority insist that they are taking into consideration of the income of my family.
Can you please provide some citation to justify my contention that the i have purchased the said land from my income and that only take into consideration other than family income.
Please help me by providing your valuable advise as well as some important judgements in this context.
With regards,
RAMESH CHANDRAN.S
Chandrahas
03 December 2009 at 12:15
Hi Sir
I HAVE 1 BROTHER AND 3 SISTER MY Q ARE MY PARENTS ARE DEATH, THEIR THEY ARE NOT MADE ANY WILL, AND MY ALL SISTER ARE MARRIED SO HOW SHOULD PERCENTAGE I GET AFTER DIVIDETION
My FATHER DEATH IN 1983 PROPERTY ARE VILLAGE LAND
1. The property belonged to whom? your father or mother? Father
2. Whether you are governed by hindu law or christian law? Hindu Law
Chandrahas
03 December 2009 at 10:07
Hi Sir
I HAVE 1 BROTHER AND 3 SISTER MY Q ARE MY PARENTS ARE DEATH, THEIR THEY ARE NOT MADE ANY WILL, AND MY ALL SISTER ARE MARRIED SO HOW SHOULD PERCENTAGE I GET AFTER DIVIDETION
My FATHER DEATH IN 1983 PROPERTY ARE VILLAGE LAND
Neville
03 December 2009 at 08:57
Dear sirs,
I have a query on the subject.ght
1. A SC person cultivating land from 1986. Can he have rights to the property as per the law. Adverse possession.
2. This is MHADA land in Mumbai.
3. What is the procedure for regularising the land under adverse possession.
Pl revert on the above.
Regards
Neville Da Silva Mumbai
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
LIMITATION ACT AND PROPERTY PURCAHSE IN MINOR AGE
Plantiff file a benami property case against defendent No. 1 ( real owner of property) with foreged documents of 19 years old Housing society informed the court that according to their record these documents are not submit in society and according to society Defendent No.1 is the real owner of said property.
Plantif fail to proof benami in evidence.
Please inform me that the Limitation act is applicable on this case and this case is time barred.
Is He who alledges a fact shoudl prove the same.
An the burden of proof should be proved by the person who lays cliam as Benamidar.