Anonymous
20 April 2010 at 16:33
Dear Experts of the forum,
This matter/question pertains to A P state and Telangana area.
What is :
1) 38 E,
2) Protected Tenant ,
3) Ordinary Tenant ,
is pattedar/Inamdar has any right along with cultivator/kowldar , PT, OT ?
Hoping to get quick and early reply,
Thanking you ALL.
Anonymous
20 April 2010 at 16:07
Dear Friends of the FORUM,
A property from a Widower 'F' comes to a person 'M' through a WILL. What is this property in the hands of 'M', is it self earned or....? Can 'M' will this property to any one he desires? (Apart from this 'M' is having some ancestral property also.)
Thanking you ALL,in advance .
Anonymous
20 April 2010 at 15:17
Dear Sir,
My uncle Living in Jogeshwari where he lives in light bill & ration card is on his name but pagadi system rent receipt in his father name so there property gone for SRA Scheme so his father is in native place he can not come every time .& my uncle have one brother also
so brother can give no objection certificate & transfer room to my uncle name for Good for SRA scheme & uncle making Declaration that this room may be in future 50% on his & 50% on his brother name so brother can demand for the rights for the rooms
kirandoke
20 April 2010 at 00:53
hi im kiran i have a flat which i had given it to my uncle to stay for some time now he is not ready to leave the property the property is in my name i approached the local police but in vain as my uncle is himself a police Havaldar so cause of his influence my case is now refer to the tahasildar under section 145 i want to understand what next i want my property back or to be sealed please advice urgently as the matter has not yet gone to tahasildar as i dont want my uncle to stay there im ready to go to court provided the property is sealed.
Ashu Joshi
19 April 2010 at 20:26
Dear Experts,
If an NRI/ POI is not holding any POI card or OCC (overseas Citizenship Certificate), can he get the registration of his propert purchased by him, in India?
Thanks & Regards
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 18:52
sir
my self and my brother bought a house together with 50 percent share.
However due to the circumstances at that time i paid the 80 percent of the total amount. Now i want to claim for the 80percent for the share of the property.
do i have any legal standing just because i have proof that i paid the 80 percent of the amount
Kunal
19 April 2010 at 17:26
We had a ancestors property. A rgistered partition was done among ourseleves. As my grandpa was serving Indian army a land occupied by tenant was alloted to our branch (as tenancy is not applicable to army persons) under section 43c.
Later my grandpa and tenant made a appeal to Dy Collector where the order was passed to allot 5 acres to the landlord (ie my grandpa). Again being unsatisfied my grandpa and tenant made a appeal to Collector, again the same order was passed by collector. Both of them (tenant and grandpa) were not satisfied by the order hence both approached to High court. The matter was pending there for 10 yrs in a meanwhile my grandpa expiered. In 1993 High court remanded the suit and asked to go to revenue again. The order by high court was passed as ---- "The order is being remanded and the authorities has to decide the share of the landlord considering the actual meets and bounds held by the joint family, also no fresh appeals can be made the appeal has to continue considering the previous one".
After this not even the tenant and us approached the court or revenue authorities. My father was new to this and had no knowledge. In 1997 the tenant made a appeal to Tahasildar. Tahasildar passed the order in favour of tenant.
My father then made a appeal to Collector, but then forceably due to some crisis my father had to compromise and the tenant in writing on a simple piece of paper took the signatures of my father and mutuation entry was passed on 7/12 extract by the name of tenant. Also my grandmas powers were taken (Hakka sod patra) under sectin 32g
Queries are>>
1) Can the matter be reopened - as the high court had passed the order to remand the case and not to file fresh case.
2) High court has just asked the authorities to decide my grandpas share in the property and same to be alloted to the hiers.
3) Has the tenant cheated us or made a fraud - by making a fresh appeal.
4) Tahasildar has over ruled the High court orders --- so can it be squashed if we make a appeal to high court again???
5) Can widows (my grandma) rights be taken by tenant in this matter??
6) Also the land has come in muncilality limits in 1997 - so is the tenancy applicable???
7) My Dad has made a compromise on plain paper is it valid?? No other members of the family has signed the documents (Hiers after my grandpa --- One son (my father), three daughtrs)
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 15:03
we are 5 heirs of our joint ancestal property andout of which 3 have signed a saleagreement and they have taken cheques on our behalf iam not interested in selling the property .will the sale happen without my sign and i am ready to pay back the advance given on my shareand the agreement period is also over now how to proceed
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 13:44
My grandfather had purchased land , the funding of land and construction over same is done by my father and grand father .
My grand father had 3 sons . After construction he handed over ground floor to my father . Since 1973 we are residing there . My grandfather expired in 1973 , leaving behind grandmother and 3 sons.
The propery was never transfered to any one after his death . My father expired in 1994 and grandmother in 1999 , and one of my uncle expired in 2004 . The property still stands in grandfather name .
Now my uncle and aunt has applied for there share in Estate office to tune of 35% and 35% each and ours 30% , on ground that after death of my father the share again split in our family and my grandmother .
Ie Upon my Grand father death -
Grandmother 25%
My father 25%
my uncle-1 25%
my unclr-2 25%
As my father expired in 1994 , then 25% splits in
My grandmother 6%
my mother 6%
myself 6%
my brother 6%
hence my Grandmother share become 31%.
On my grandmother death 31% split in 3 parts
Hence our family in total is getting 29.71% .
We have renovated the groundfloor , and my other uncles family is getting rent for 1st floor alternative months.
pls advice is our family share is only 30% .What is provision of oral partion alraedy happened 40 yrs back and we are in possession of Ground floor and my father has incurred amount on construction and till date no one had claimed any mutation .
regards
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
DSIIDC fleecing SME allottees
Having recovered (1990-92) 60% more (@ 650/=) than the original (1988 scheme) premium @ 406/- per sq. mtr. much before the execution of lease deed (2006), Delhi State Indl. Dev. Corporation Ltd is not only demanding another (35%) enhancement (without any notice or justification) that too, with interest @ 18% p.a. but also Ground Rent (@2.5%p.a.) & Maintenance Charges (@2.5%p.a.)since 1992 (14 years ahead of lease) also with interest @ 18% p.a. without any services / maintenance (even for the name sake) by with-holding self-created requirement of NOC for getting building plan approval from MCD ?
Such restrictive / unfair trade practice by the monopolistic DSIIDC is further reflected in its fleecing such allottees for so-called delay in construction by demanding PENALTY @ Rs. 910/= per sq.mtr. instead of Hon'ble L.G.'s approved composition charges @ Rs. 10/= per sq. mtr. upto 4th year after date of lease execution or Rs. 20/= per sq. mtr. upto 5th year after lease execution (2006) ?
Would a suit u/s 89 or 90 CPC be advisable for timely legal intervention or Writ from High Court be effective / quicker ?