Rohit Sharma
01 November 2014 at 14:59
R/ Sir,
My father bought a property in 1986 in Kalyanpur i.e, Arazi property and from now he not apply for Daakhil khaarij, My father expired in 2010.
Sir now I appealed for daakhil khaarij on 10th July 14 - through a broker (Broker's cousin brother is a lawyer), I submitted my deed in original, death certificate of my father(Original), mother's photo, raasan card etc.
Sir I would like to know that, is there original property Deed and Death certificate (Original) will be submitted in original in kanpur Tehsil or not and how much time it will be taken in Daakhil Khaarij and Namaantaran process.
I have also a confusion that whether the broker or broker's lawyer can harm my property as He have my original deed and my father's death certificate.
Best Regards
KISHORE KUMAR JOSHI
24 October 2014 at 18:54
I am the owner of the building staying on the 4th floor and on the top is the roof which undet my lock & key. Can I restrict the tenants not to use the roof ?
KISHORE KUMAR JOSHI
24 October 2014 at 18:52
I am the owner of the building staying on the 4th floor and on the top is the roof which undet my lock & key. Can I restrict the tenants not to use the roof ?
KISHORE KUMAR JOSHI
24 October 2014 at 18:45
I am the landlod of the building and staying at 4th floor and on the top is the roof can I stop the tenants not to use the roof which us under my lock and key?
Anand Saraf
15 October 2014 at 18:55
GA No.3120 of 2014
CS No.358 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
PANGHAT SAREES PVT. LTD.
-Versus-
PANGHAT & ORS.
Appearance:
Mr. Ranjan Bachawat, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Adv.
...for the plaintiff.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN
Date : 26th September, 2014.
The Court : Let the affidavit of service filed in Court
today be kept with the records.
In spite of service of this application, none has
appeared to oppose this application. The petitioner is claiming to
be the sole proprietor of 'Panghat'. It is stated that the
petitioner is the owner of the trademark Panghat Sarees and has
been continuing the same since 1999. It was initially in the name
of Nirmal Saraf and thereafter the private limited company was
formed in 2003. It is stated that the petitioner is the assignee
of the trademark Panghat from Nirmal Saraf, who is the promoter-
director of the company. On 30th January, 2014, on an application
filed by the petitioner, the trademark 'Panghat Sarees' have been
2
registered in the name of the petitioner in Class-24 under the
Trademarks Act, 1999. The petitioner has also filed an application
on 19th August, 2014 for registration of the wordmark "Panghat
Sarees" in Class-24 under the Trademarks Act, 1999 to protect its
exclusive proprietary right over the wordmark. In July, 2014, the
petitioner came to know that the respondents are trying to sell
sarees under an identical and deceptively similar mark "Panghat" from 127A, Park Street, Kolkata-700 017. Immediately, a cease and desist notice was issued on 20th August, 2014. Following such notice an e-mail was forwarded to the Advocate of the petitioner stating that the partnership firm was established on 1st April, 2010. A deed of partnership, executed by the partners, dated 1st April, 2010 was also forwarded to the Advocate-on-record of the petitioner. Although the wordmark has not been registered, but the fact remains that the labelmark namely, "Panghat Sarees" have been registered on 30th January, 2004 and the said registration is still valid and subsisting. It also appears that the volume of sale of the sarees of the petitioner has increased considerably from 2004-05. In such a situation, an obligation is cast upon the defendant to explain to the adoption of the wordmark "Panghat". In spite of notice the defendants are not represented. This Court is, prima facie, of the view that the petitioner has a strong prima facie case and the balance of convenience lies in favour of passing an ad interim order in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, there shall be an order in terms of prayer (b) of the petition.
The matter is made returnable on 3rd November, 2014. The petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the respondents.
Urgent certified website copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(SOUMEN SEN, J.) A/s.
Ritesh Rathod
12 October 2014 at 18:09
Dear sir, my question is - 1. Mr. X is a holder of particular Trademark now suppose mr. X had died and Mr x's near legal heir is Mr. Y. NOW Mr. X's intellectual property I.e TM how can Mr. Y can receive. In other word how can legal heir of deceased person aquired A intellectual property of deceased person? Which TM form I have to file and what documents are required along with application?
Thanks
cs Ritesh Rathod
Sarita Nakhe
08 October 2014 at 17:42
Can Educational Institutes, Housing Societies, Trusts use pirated and unlicensed software in their offices? What would be the consequences after using these pirated and unlicensed software?
Ajay Shukla
29 September 2014 at 09:58
A publisher published my book a few years back . An agreement was also signed. The copyrights were mine. The publisher did not follow the terms of the contract and never made any payment as per the terms. Now I want the same book to be published by another publisher. Does the old agreement still hold good ? can I freely get the book published by another publisher ? Does the existing publisher have any right over the book ?
Ajay Shukla
gaurav
28 September 2014 at 12:09
dear sir ,
i am planning to start tutorials for which i will have to make my own study materials for my students comipled from various sorces and also want to copyright my material.
i am from kolkata could you plz guide me how can i copyright my materials and cost involved
And MAINLY I WILL HAVE TO COPY/MODIFY SUMS ASKED IN PREVIOUS EXAMINATIONS SO TO WHAT EXTENT I CAN COPY.
PLZ HELP GENIUNLY AND URGENTLY REQUIRED.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Pagdi system flats
Hi All,
Me and my parents are living in pagdi(rent) system flat from 1989 and we have all rent receipt till date.We are regular rent payers till today.
I have few questions
1.Can owner tell us to move from my flat?
(My owner is builder and I just heard that
he want to make commercial building over here (not yet confirm))
2.On redevelopment can we get flat? if yes is it of same area? Do we get flat on same location?
Owners are not allowing us to sell flat to any other person.He want those flats to make a commercial zone. He is buying all those flats in lesser than 50% of market price.
3.Is there any rule that after paying rent to 25-30 years its not required to give rent? Indirectly rent person (my dad) will own the house?(I heard about it.Just want to be sure before connecting with my builder.)
Regards,
Parth