LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

priyank   14 November 2014 at 00:59

Trademark

Sir,

How i can get a propriter code under trademark, because only after getting propriter code i can login to trademark site ?

mehul dave   11 November 2014 at 10:43

Designs act 2000

resp. sir(s),
i am a practicing advocate. my query is as follows:
when we apply for the registration of any engineering product under the designs act 2000, we pay the requisite fees and then we get its acknowledgment wherein date of application and it's number is given.
we get the certificate of registration after a year or two. under the circumstances my question is that .....
after applying for the registration if any other person attempts to copy our design which is pending registration and tries to sell that product in market what protection we get against this? further how to prevent that other person from selling that product in market?

ganesh   07 November 2014 at 10:07

How to register trademark for juicebar in india

One of my client wants to register his trademark for his juice-bar in pune.What are the documents required as well how to register .Please guide

Parth0710   04 November 2014 at 22:40

Pagdi system flats

Hi All,
Me and my parents are living in pagdi(rent) system flat from 1989 and we have all rent receipt till date.We are regular rent payers till today.

I have few questions
1.Can owner tell us to move from my flat?
(My owner is builder and I just heard that
he want to make commercial building over here (not yet confirm))

2.On redevelopment can we get flat? if yes is it of same area? Do we get flat on same location?

Owners are not allowing us to sell flat to any other person.He want those flats to make a commercial zone. He is buying all those flats in lesser than 50% of market price.

3.Is there any rule that after paying rent to 25-30 years its not required to give rent? Indirectly rent person (my dad) will own the house?(I heard about it.Just want to be sure before connecting with my builder.)

Regards,
Parth

Rohit Sharma   01 November 2014 at 14:59

Daakhil khaarij of my land

R/ Sir,

My father bought a property in 1986 in Kalyanpur i.e, Arazi property and from now he not apply for Daakhil khaarij, My father expired in 2010.

Sir now I appealed for daakhil khaarij on 10th July 14 - through a broker (Broker's cousin brother is a lawyer), I submitted my deed in original, death certificate of my father(Original), mother's photo, raasan card etc.

Sir I would like to know that, is there original property Deed and Death certificate (Original) will be submitted in original in kanpur Tehsil or not and how much time it will be taken in Daakhil Khaarij and Namaantaran process.

I have also a confusion that whether the broker or broker's lawyer can harm my property as He have my original deed and my father's death certificate.

Best Regards

KISHORE KUMAR JOSHI   24 October 2014 at 18:54

Roof right

I am the owner of the building staying on the 4th floor and on the top is the roof which undet my lock & key. Can I restrict the tenants not to use the roof ?

KISHORE KUMAR JOSHI   24 October 2014 at 18:52

Roof right

I am the owner of the building staying on the 4th floor and on the top is the roof which undet my lock & key. Can I restrict the tenants not to use the roof ?

KISHORE KUMAR JOSHI   24 October 2014 at 18:45

Roof right

I am the landlod of the building and staying at 4th floor and on the top is the roof can I stop the tenants not to use the roof which us under my lock and key?

Anand Saraf   15 October 2014 at 18:55

I received an order. please explain me the same

GA No.3120 of 2014
CS No.358 of 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE




PANGHAT SAREES PVT. LTD.

-Versus-

PANGHAT & ORS.

Appearance:
Mr. Ranjan Bachawat, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Adv.
...for the plaintiff.

BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN

Date : 26th September, 2014.


The Court : Let the affidavit of service filed in Court

today be kept with the records.

In spite of service of this application, none has

appeared to oppose this application. The petitioner is claiming to

be the sole proprietor of 'Panghat'. It is stated that the

petitioner is the owner of the trademark Panghat Sarees and has

been continuing the same since 1999. It was initially in the name

of Nirmal Saraf and thereafter the private limited company was

formed in 2003. It is stated that the petitioner is the assignee

of the trademark Panghat from Nirmal Saraf, who is the promoter-

director of the company. On 30th January, 2014, on an application

filed by the petitioner, the trademark 'Panghat Sarees' have been
2


registered in the name of the petitioner in Class-24 under the

Trademarks Act, 1999. The petitioner has also filed an application

on 19th August, 2014 for registration of the wordmark "Panghat

Sarees" in Class-24 under the Trademarks Act, 1999 to protect its

exclusive proprietary right over the wordmark. In July, 2014, the

petitioner came to know that the respondents are trying to sell
sarees under an identical and deceptively similar mark "Panghat" from 127A, Park Street, Kolkata-700 017. Immediately, a cease and desist notice was issued on 20th August, 2014. Following such notice an e-mail was forwarded to the Advocate of the petitioner stating that the partnership firm was established on 1st April, 2010. A deed of partnership, executed by the partners, dated 1st April, 2010 was also forwarded to the Advocate-on-record of the petitioner. Although the wordmark has not been registered, but the fact remains that the labelmark namely, "Panghat Sarees" have been registered on 30th January, 2004 and the said registration is still valid and subsisting. It also appears that the volume of sale of the sarees of the petitioner has increased considerably from 2004-05. In such a situation, an obligation is cast upon the defendant to explain to the adoption of the wordmark "Panghat". In spite of notice the defendants are not represented. This Court is, prima facie, of the view that the petitioner has a strong prima facie case and the balance of convenience lies in favour of passing an ad interim order in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, there shall be an order in terms of prayer (b) of the petition.

The matter is made returnable on 3rd November, 2014. The petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the respondents.

Urgent certified website copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(SOUMEN SEN, J.) A/s.

Ritesh Rathod   12 October 2014 at 18:09

Death of holder of Trademark

Dear sir, my question is - 1. Mr. X is a holder of particular Trademark now suppose mr. X had died and Mr x's near legal heir is Mr. Y. NOW Mr. X's intellectual property I.e TM how can Mr. Y can receive. In other word how can legal heir of deceased person aquired A intellectual property of deceased person? Which TM form I have to file and what documents are required along with application?
Thanks
cs Ritesh Rathod