Spartan
31 July 2012 at 14:44
Hello Sir,
I gave Rs 1,00,000 to my cousin in Apr 2009 for his business. I have transferred this amount to his friends bank account and that time no promissory note was written. Till today, he has not paid to me and recently (Jan 2012) executed a Promissory note for the same with his Own Signature and hand writing. It is mentioned that 2% per month as interest. While executing he promised me to pay the amount in installments and have not paid single rupee until now though he is getting good salary and he and/or his family is not attempting my calls and started fighting with me when I ask them money.
Please advice me how to recover money from him?
Thanks in advance.
malipeddi jaggarao
31 July 2012 at 12:32
Can anybody provide order copy of Bangalore HC dismissing the appeal in the WRIT PETITION NUMBER 24158-24160/2011 on 30TH JULY 2012?
satyanarayana
31 July 2012 at 12:07
I would like to lend the money (15 lakh) at an intreset rate of 24% to a construction company whose turn over is around 10 crore/annum.Please suggest the necessary documents to be procured from the company for legal transaction.Please help me in the format of the documents and the rules to be framed in the document to proceed legally and to get back the money incase of the unexpected conditions
satyanarayana
31 July 2012 at 12:00
I would like to lend the money (15 lakh) at an intreset rate of 24% to a construction company whose turn over is around 10 crore/annum.Please suggest the necessary documents to be procured from the company for legal transaction.Please help me in the format of the documents and the rules to be framed in the document to proceed legally and to get back the money incase of the unexpected conditions
Sadanand B. Panchal
30 July 2012 at 23:26
Respected Sir,
My name is Sadanand Bhisaji Panchal. I am residing at 60/A, Karle Chawl, Dunhill Building Compound,Dr.Ambedkar Road, Khar (W) Mumbai-400 052.I am fighting for Justice before the Hon'ble City Civil court at Dindoshi Mumbai. I am not an Advocate but appeared in person before Hon'ble Court, therefore I require your valuable advice.
Kindly explain me the meaning of "vendor is absolutely seized and possessed land and hereditaments together with structures thereon save and excepting those belonging to XX" in the indentures, deeds.
I have obtained the certified copy of the conveyance deed regarding land where I am staying. Not having known the exact meaning of the above referred line "Save and excepting" I have taken the adjournment in the matter. Please help me.
Thank you,
Sadanand B. Panchal
up bhavik
29 July 2012 at 10:28
While study the Draft of the letter of allotment what points are to be kept in the mind for the person who is booked the flat with re developer?
Normally draft of lietter of allotment drafted so that all points are in favour of builders.So to protect the int of the Flat purchaser who invest money in lacs , how to keep the int by putting clause in the letter of the allotment.
ple give the guidence.
pooja dedhia
27 July 2012 at 14:33
when the partner are introducing additional the capital by the taking the loan from his wife,sons,his capital in the partnership firm is increased, and at the same time his personal balance, liability will increases by
that amount.
when the partnership firm will want to raise the finance from the bank , institution or third party financer,how they see the personal balance sheet of partner?
how it effect the decision of the reader of the Balance sheet ?
if it weeken or merk as negative impact,can son tr the amt as gift?
how above option works?
hamirsingh
26 July 2012 at 22:23
my wife's Gurbachan Singh father made a will of his immovable property in his two married sons only instead of other three married daughters. The Property/land was not purchased by him and that is allotted in India after August 15, 1947 against their parents i.e. his father Budh Singh's land of Pakistan.Is this according to law, please clarify.
R Karthikeyan
26 July 2012 at 21:25
Sir
As per my documents, I have 30 cents of land in SF No.184/4 but nine persons were occupied wrongly in my SF No.184/4 instead of their holding of property in 184/3a and 5 out of 9 persons were built houses on the SF No.184/4 by wrong identification.
And after police complaint etc, we proved ourself thro submitting official survey report, revenue records, certificates from Tahsildar, surveyor, Village Administrative Officer, Municipal Corporation and police report etc to the 9 parties, the nine parties didn't accept any records and they have approached the Principal District Munsif seeking prayer for rectification of mistakes in their documents to SF No.184/4 instead of 184/3a by exparty.
The PDM also has given degree by safely that the excutant should execute the rectification deed and thereafter the degree will be effective.
In this case the executant doesn't have the rights to do rectification deed, since he is having the documents only in SF No.184/3a and his previous executants also having the rights of 184/3a, none of the parent documents mentioned as 184/4.
Please note that the above 9 of them filed suit against me in 1 ADM for praying injection for restraining my entrance of their SF 184/3a (wrongly occupied SF No.184/4 pertaining to my land). In this case I have filed counter for seeking commissioner for confirming the SF No. OS is still pending, since they are dragging the case since april '2011.
I have sent notice to SRO, stating the facts with proof documents towards my objection and their cheating or malafide intention etc., today evening.
Last degree was passed on 09-07-2012.
In this stage what I will do ?
1. Whether I will go appeal for setaside the degree in same court but it takes more than a year since it will decided only after trial.
2. Shall I go to Writ of Mandamus or certriori for quashing etc ?
3. Is there any other option to setaside the degree without seeing facts or verifying the documents,given by pdm ?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Stamp duty type
Dear sir
If purchasing e-Stamp in New Delhi state for the purpose of making Bank Guarantee From any Bank, that will be signed by Authorised Bank officials on behalf of their customer in favour of the that company from where their client/customer is dealing the business
Pls tell us about which type of e-stamp Duty we should mentioned in the caption
which one is appropriate and correct.
Some one is using it like
1.) General Agreement [5]
2.) Indemnity Bond [15]
3.) Affidavit [4]