This discussion explores whether a married daughter's husband and children can be considered coparceners or members of her father's Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) after the 2005 amendment to Hindu law and the Supreme Court's Vineeta Sharma vs. Rakesh Sharma judgment. While daughters are now recognised as coparceners with rights akin to sons, the consensus in the discussion is that the daughter's husband and her children do not automatically become coparceners in the paternal HUF.