LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

RTIAct 2005

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 10 April 2011 This query is : Resolved 
Thanks again Sirs
Since replied quickly.
The RTI case is : On some complaints to Rly.Vig. Dept question the applicant as there was no corruption ,so, they raised that some favour has been shown to relatives, who were forced to give statement under duress & a chargesheet was issued and DE is pending.So applicant wanted information who are complainants & who were associated in vig case? RTIAct Section 8(1)g & j are exempted for parting infm.But Bhagatsingh case was decided by Delhi H/Court in similarly situated case. CIC didn't listen those cited cases and passed the order not to part infmn, Query is can H/Court be requested to pass stricture agnst CIC and also part with the documents for taking agnst concocted complaints for vested interest later on since no element of corruption was involved, as their men could not come out successfulin recruitment from whom they had collected huge sum, which was refunded later on (learnt from reliable sources).Thanks.
R.Ramachandran (Expert) 11 April 2011
Repeated query. Already replied.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :