Ahishek Shinde
(Querist) 25 June 2012
This query is : Resolved
Between X and Y, they have ancestral properties P1, P2 and P3.
X filed civil suit for partition regarding properties P1, P2 and P3. Court ordered to give 1/2 share of P1, P2 and P3 to X. X then filed suit for execution of ordered decree (Darkhast). In this suit compromise was done between X and Y. X agreed 1/2 share in P1 and he left properties P2 and P3 completely for Y.
Now X holds : 1/2 share in P1. Y holds : 1/2 share in P1, complete P2 and complete P3.
Now son of X is claiming for share in P2 and P3. Is this claim has any legal base?
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup