Harrassed by Judiciary
Vikrant Goel
(Querist) 08 June 2011
This query is : Resolved
I am heartly Thankful to you all for your advice but I don't want to seek transfer of my case from Hansi court as it is a fight against the misuse of law, position and how a women can b cruel towards her own children and husband and i want to see how cruel they can be, this could be helpful to others in future. I am not feared of any threats though i am facing a lot of problem in my personnel life but still morally very strong. By misuse of law and position they have not just dishonured me but also has ruined my emotion and dignity. I will continue with my fight let the judge give his decision of my imprisonment.
Tajobsindia
(Expert) 20 September 2012
Since the queriest is not interested in pursuing the query after placing it here from last 1 year, hence closing this query by hitting Resolved drop down.
Guest
(Expert) 20 September 2012
Dear Tajobsindia,
I wonder, when nobody tried to solve the problem of the querist, instead of providing any solution, how you have assumed the query to have been solved when the querist has not declared so? Not only that, you have declared on behalf of several other querists that their queries have been solved without any solution on those queries.
Tajobsindia
(Expert) 20 September 2012
Mr. Dhingra,
These is a huge meaning difference between "not pursuing" and "solved".
You are using 'solved' word which is not the right word to use here. Also "queriest" means a person asking a query with reference to Expert section where Expert reply to a "query".
I used word "not pursuing" from last 1 year by no one (which includes you and by me).
Here "several others" means several other "Experts".
If we as Experts colly. fail to answer a 'query' from last 1 year and on top "queriest" himself does not show any interest to pursue his own query then before questioning me you could have solved yourself the persons query !
If you have right to question me so do I have same rights as we both were cleared as Experts for this section by Admins. of LCI.
I am sure now rest of fellow Experts including you will question my above explanation and probably still no one including me will attempt to solve this query even after 1 year. I followed what Court does when a suit matter gets dismissed “due to non pursual by party”
You probably will not question Court after 1 year but you may question me which I found amusing after 1 year.
In that case I am done clarifying / explaining here and now you may react as per your wishes or choose to close this irrational Q & A or still not satisfied then you including all Experts here may directly tell Mods. to delete my a/c what else you expect me to do seeing after 1 year a OPEN query ????.
Rgds.
Guest
(Expert) 20 September 2012
Dear Tajobsindia,
Just reply one question for my information, do you have any right or authority to declare on behalf of the querist that th matter pertaining to his querryor problem is resolved?
Vikrant Goel
(Querist) 21 September 2012
I had approached every higher authority against Hisar Judiciary but i feel it was worthless as we are bound to live under the cruelty of position holder in this country where there is no justice and finally in the interest of your children future you are bound to compromise and pay price for the crime which you have never committed in your life. I have beared a lot of injustice by the Hisar Judiciary Judge as it was Hisar Judiciary (Personally) vs me, and paid price to purchase divorce & justice. This is our India. I am totally dis hearted from the process of Judiciary and finally hate Indian Judiciary and my ex-wife.
Vikrant Goel
(Querist) 23 October 2012
this query is not resolved and i believe none can resolve it.
