BIPIN MEHTA
(Querist) 11 October 2013
This query is : Resolved
I AM OFFICE BEARER OF ONE SOCIETY AT KANDIVALI SOME MEMBERS WHO HAD NOT PURCHASED STILT PARKING FROM BUILDERS FORCE MANAGING COMMITEE TO TAKE ACTION OF VACATING STILT WHO HAD PURCHASED FROM BUILDERS AND TO REALLOT AMONG THE MEMBERS IN VIEW OF S.C JUDGEMENT ARE THEY RIGHT? WHAT COMMITTEE SHOULD DO IN SUCH SITUATION IS JUDGEMENT APPLICABLE RETOSPECTIVELY OR FROM THE DATE OF JUDGEMENT IS ANY BODY SUBMITTED REVIEW PETITION THANKS
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 11 October 2013
The demand is legal and genuine and the judgment ibid is applicable with retrospective effect. So provide notices to those members who had purchased those spaces from builder and then re-allocate as per policy of the society.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 11 October 2013
well advised by the expert raj kumar makkad ji.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 11 October 2013
you want advise (free ) on the interpretation of Supreme Court Judgement without showing judgement and without even mentioning details thereof.
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup