Arms act

Bala shankar (Querist) 20 July 2012 This query is : Resolved
the accused is charged u/s 25(1-B)r/w sec.3 of arms act 1959. is it necessary to examine the ballistic expert to prove the charge for the prosecution.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

V R SHROFF (Expert) 21 July 2012
If necessary to prove, yes.
What is your aim??

Bala shankar (Querist) 23 July 2012
my aim is to get conviction

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Harrasement and metal agony from husband
Applicability of po act
Nps to old pension scheme
Suit filed by heirs claiming ancestral property
Hindu succession query
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Claiming ownership of the motor vehicle of a deceased person
Company name struck off by the registrar of companies

Consumer / contract dispute
Regular matters
Request for second opinion in bar council proceedings
Reinforcing rule-based adjudication in proceedings
Awaiting the shrewd advocate's answer.
Pl. check for legal accuracy
Legal notice used for harrasment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law