Evidence Act

Monish Nilwant (Querist) 07 May 2008 This query is : Resolved
Can Some one explain me is there a peovision in the evidence act which says that a 30 year old document is presumed to be valid and it cannot be challenged before the court of law as not being conclusive proof.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Monish Nilwant (Querist) 07 May 2008
8

TSBehera (Expert) 07 May 2008
There is a provision but if you find them false you must gather evidence otherwise document shall be admitted as evidence.Any contradictory document on same or similar matters shall suffice

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Harrasement and metal agony from husband
Applicability of po act
Nps to old pension scheme
Suit filed by heirs claiming ancestral property
Hindu succession query
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Claiming ownership of the motor vehicle of a deceased person
Company name struck off by the registrar of companies

Regular matters
Request for second opinion in bar council proceedings
Reinforcing rule-based adjudication in proceedings
Awaiting the shrewd advocate's answer.
Pl. check for legal accuracy
Legal notice used for harrasment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Dismissals due to defective legal notices