u/s 419,420,465,467,471,120B IPC
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 18 June 2011
This query is : Resolved
FIR registered aganist 7 persons u/s419,420,465,467,468,471 of IPC & u/s 12 of Passports ACT 1967.A person main accused under judicial custody who has same name Satnam singh(imaginary name) of terrorist & he by personation made fake documets which are compulsory for making passport and applied passport of terrorist `s wife,two sons by stateting that his own wife & sons .I am going to appear a person who verified Satnam Singh .This person is NAMBARDAR of Satnam singh ` village,& he is 68 years old & patient of sugar.He just verifired Satnam Singh who is living in his village & has no any criminal record but Satnam singh by fraud made documents of Satnam singh who is terrorist `s wife & sons.Satnam Singh terrorist living in German wid his wife & sons.These passports made in the year 2008 after passports made he also sent them in German.but the person who verified it was unaware of all this,in police verification for passport he verified satnam singh.now we are going to file anticipatory bail for person who verified ie NAMBARDAR,I need your kind help which arguments are best for our favor & i need judgements for my case.This case is high profile case in our town,could Session Judge grant bail?I need ur urgent & kind help.
Thanking YOu
Ajay Bansal
(Expert) 20 June 2011
Laws against you. There is no chance of bail on any type of arguments.
