138 of NI Act

V. Ramakrishna (Querist) 30 May 2011 This query is : Resolved
"unless and until it is stated and proved that an offense coming u/s 138 made out as per the statue the presumptions u\s 139 cannot be drawn either by the complainant or by the Court "

I understand there are many SC judgements to support the above .

I would be gratefull if ref to SC judgement copy is up loaded in this site .
let me also know is the above stand
correct?

REgards

Ramakrishna

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Arvind Singh Chauhan (Expert) 31 May 2011
I do require plz members!!

PALNITKAR V.V. (Expert) 02 June 2011
Please see Rangappa Vs. Sri Mohan decided by Supreme Court. to see the judgment follow the link. http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/150051/

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Harrasement and metal agony from husband
Applicability of po act
Nps to old pension scheme
Suit filed by heirs claiming ancestral property
Hindu succession query
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Claiming ownership of the motor vehicle of a deceased person
Company name struck off by the registrar of companies

Consumer / contract dispute
Regular matters
Request for second opinion in bar council proceedings
Reinforcing rule-based adjudication in proceedings
Awaiting the shrewd advocate's answer.
Pl. check for legal accuracy
Legal notice used for harrasment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law