S.200.202 of Cr.P.C. read with S.138,142,145(1)Neg.Ins.Act

Rahul Singh (Querist) 21 March 2010 This query is : Resolved
Whether examination of Complainant on oath is mandatory as per S.200,202 of Cr.P.C.in Cheque bouncing case? Also S.138,142,145(1)as Non-Obsstante clause does not relieve the Magistrate to examine the Complainant on oath? Give ruling of S.C.in priority i.e.only affidavit is sufficient & examination of Complainant is not mandatory.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Rahul Singh (Querist) 18 April 2010
Dear Advocates,
Kindly resolve my query dt.21/03/2010

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

How lord meduza assisted me to win the lottery jackpot
Pb govt property legal heir notification
Esi limit as per new labour code
Purchase agriculture land in gujarat
Propert tax mistakenly paid to mtob dept
Sale deed, the boundaries got interchanged by mistake
Guidance in dv and crpc125
Need contact of advocate m s kulkarni mumbai high court
Is payout for surplus solar energy units taxable?
Need help with execution of maharera order

Can i marry my mother's sister's daughter?
Rent case kerala
Section 125 for maintenance for my son
Regular matters
Request for second opinion in bar council proceedings
Reinforcing rule-based adjudication in proceedings
Awaiting the shrewd advocate's answer.
Pl. check for legal accuracy
Legal notice used for harrasment
Is advocate guilty?