SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 02 September 2010
This query is : Resolved
SIR
I AM PRACTICING ADVOCATE IN VISAKHAPATNAM
CASE DETAILS FOLLOWS
VENDOR AGREE TO SELL HIS LAND AND HE MADE TWO AGREEMENTS
FIRST AGREEMENT IN 1998 AUGUST
SECOUND AGREEMENT IN 1999 JULY
IN THAT SECOND AGREEMENT HOLDER FILED CASE IN 2001 YEAR UNDER SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND HE OBTAINED DECREE, IN THAT A APPEAL HAS PRNDING
I AM CONTESTING FOR FIRST AGREEMENT HOLDER , HE COMPLETED HIS LAND REGISTRATION IN 2008 YEAR AND MUTATIONS ETC. LATER THE DECREE HOLDER COME WITH ANTI SOCIAL ELEMENTS, THEN I FILED A CASE AGANIST MY VENDOR AND THE SECOND AGREEMENT HOLDER
HOW CAN I CONTEST ORDER 39 RULE 1& 2 PETITION AS WELL AS IN SUIT PROCEEDING
s.subramanian
(Expert) 03 September 2010
first of all the sale deed taken by your client during the pendency of the case by the second agreement holder is hit by lis pendens. UNLESS you are able to explain this you will face serious problems in the present suit filed by you.
