Evidence Act

Monish Nilwant (Querist) 07 May 2008 This query is : Resolved
Can Some one explain me is there a peovision in the evidence act which says that a 30 year old document is presumed to be valid and it cannot be challenged before the court of law as not being conclusive proof.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Monish Nilwant (Querist) 07 May 2008
8

TSBehera (Expert) 07 May 2008
There is a provision but if you find them false you must gather evidence otherwise document shall be admitted as evidence.Any contradictory document on same or similar matters shall suffice

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Llb graduate
Crpc 156(3) criminal complaint after e-filing
Regarding heir certificate of deceased woman
Issues on axis bank
Need legal help
Professional hacker
2 child policy in rajasthan
I need legal guidance regarding my bank account freeze.
Guidance on 498a, maintenance, and settlement decision
Gratuity paid after 1 year and 5 months

Request for second opinion in bar council proceedings
Reinforcing rule-based adjudication in proceedings
Awaiting the shrewd advocate's answer.
Pl. check for legal accuracy
Legal notice used for harrasment
Is advocate guilty?
Advocate�s duty to justice apply to the pre-litigation ?
Legal opinion on baseless legal notice and law
Dismissals due to defective legal notices
Legal notice content