East punjab urban rent restriction act1949
Adv B.B.Gambhir #9814820602
(Querist) 08 June 2012
This query is : Open
i asked earlier. a rent petition for ejectment was filed by satpal sharma and sanjeev sharma and naresh sharma being co sharer against radhe sham that rent petition was dismissed in default due to non presence of petitioner. in that rent radhe sham had admitted the relationship of landlord and tenant.during the pendency of petition, radhe sham and satpal sharma both died. later on after some time, Sanjeev Sharma filed alone a rent petition by stating himself as lawful owner on the basis of Will against surinder kumar as legal heir of radhe sham. no other legal heir of radhe sham was impleaded as party. in present rent petition, Surinder kumar denied the relationship of landlord and tenant due to which the court despite assessing the rent, framed the issues which is wrong. Surinder Kumar moved an application for amendment by stating that he has inadvertently denied the relationship but the said application was also dismissed. even by high court too. now what the remedy available for Surinder Kumar. he is ready to pay the rent. the eviction order shall be passed in present case. it is sure. case is fixed for cross examination of witness. it is pertinent to mention here that the other co sharer Narinder Sharma also died and his legal heirs have challanged the Will the said matter is also pending in Civil Court. can other legal heir of radhe krishan file an application for impleading himself as party.
