venkatesh Rao
(Expert) 29 November 2014
Too few facts for reply.
shrenik
(Querist) 30 November 2014
The case details are as under
I m accused no 2
Fir is lodged against acused no 1 Complainent said that acused no 1 took computers on rent from him and then he did not return the computers
And said computers are told to sold to acused no 2
Now
Their is no evidence against acused no 2
No computers recovered Our name is nt in fir No evidence of any thing sold to us And more over its in writing by acused no 1 that he doesnt know to whom he has sold the computers
Now the publix prosicutor said that in panchnama whixh was done at our ofice the panch said that acused no 2 said we have taken computer and sold to various customers
Now how can a punchnama a punch can come to know in 10 minutes we have sold computers to others
And also we have never said that we have taken any computers
Pls sugest us what can we do
Guest
(Expert) 30 November 2014
Consult a Local Good Criminal Side Advocate.What were the Statements of Accused No;1 Whether the Accused 1 is known to you in any way.Where were you and with whom you were Present at the time of Offence and so called Transactions with you by Accused 1.If Neccessary apply for Anticipatory Bail.
shrenik
(Querist) 30 November 2014
No sir acused no 1 is not know to us
We dnt know him
At the time of offece we were nt present
There are no proof of any trasaction with acused no 1
Guest
(Expert) 30 November 2014
Then the Case seems to be manipulated.Immediately get in touch with a good criminal side advocate of your place.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 30 November 2014
Quashing would be allowed is doubtful discharge application already rejected. Defend the case on merits.
shrenik
(Querist) 30 November 2014
Hello rajendra sir
We can go to session courts for apeal ???
ajay sethi
(Expert) 30 November 2014
what were the grounds for rejection of your discharge application ? when you raise a query you must always mention reasons given by court for rejecting your discharge application . best option for you is to contest case on merits before trial court
shrenik
(Querist) 30 November 2014
ground was only that the panchnama which was done at our office in that panch has said that acused no 2 had bought the computers and sold to others and acused no 2 does nt know to whom they sold the computers
ajay sethi
(Expert) 30 November 2014
it is complainant case that computers were taken on rent by accused no 1 and solt to accused no 2 . further panch has stated that accused no 2 had bought the computers .
it is your case that you never bought the computers . it has to be established in trial whether any computers were in fact purchased by you . better contest case on merits before trial court
shrenik
(Querist) 30 November 2014
we thinking for going to revision to sesion and then to high court
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 03 December 2014
You have been given proper advise, despite that if you are adamant to go for appeal/revision, it is your problem, you should not have approached this place for advise at all if you know what is to be done.
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup