Umesh Pandurang Jadhav
(Querist) 23 June 2018
This query is : Resolved
Recently ronika and manish case is going on in which the family court passes no cross order bcoz ronika n her lawyer were absent.
In criminal court the judge passes NBW to ronika bcoz she was absent.
Married on 10-10-15, Petition filed by manish on 10-4-16. In family court . Ronika declared unmarried status in election affidavit on 20-10-16. Ronika futher filed w.s on 10-3-17.
My question If to give more weightage to election affidavit then is it possible for ronikas lawyer to take again re-cross examination of manish on base of w.s which was filled in court after declared of election affidavit.
Ronika and manish married on 10-10-15, husband & wife running their case in family court . In beginning Manish filled petition for divorce from Ronika... Even Ronika gave replied to Manish's notice and submitted W.S on 10-3-17 in family court.. After wards Ronika declared under oath on affidavit regarding marital status as UNMARRIED in election ...on 20-10-16. In addition Ronika declare that she is wife of her father in general affidavit which was additional attachment to other election affidavits . Manish received her election affidavit of unmarried status via RTI and submitted to family court judge .. Manish filled private case under section IPC 420 & 406 in criminal court on 12-8-17. Even criminal court judge issued notice to Ronika under IPC 420 & 406.Even election commission launched 125A RP act 1951 against Ronika . My question Possible for Manish to launch defamation case against Ronika ? How much money do Manish need to pay to court ?