DCR 33 (7) - Cessed structure / MHADA 95 A
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 15 March 2011
This query is : Open
Hi, I have an query or u can a confusion related to DCR 33 7 & MHADA 95 A,this is a case of a developer under DCR 33 (7) in composite redevelopment scheme. My father a tenant & was been actally shifetd to transit camp on the same plot of the developer in year 2001 & later the developer called my father to execute a agreement of a flat but the building was constructed in the year 1997 & we shifted in year 2001 in transit, but my father refused it because it was already been alotted to one of the tenant in the 1997 and she sold it to developer in year 2006.I have a question that is the developer is right to give an allotment which was already allotted to other means used one..& recently the MHADA gave us a notice to vacate in 7 day's & to shift to permanent alternate accomadation. We appealed in city civil court but we didin't get any injunction or relief against the eviction in the year 2010 they vacated us and shifted to the old building saying it was alloted on my father name in year 1997. later i came to know from one of the real eastate broker that mhada dont have power's to put you in permanent alternate accomodation, they can only put you in transit camp under 95 A. is he right?
