s sharma
11 March 2015 at 00:39
In the restitution of conjugal rights I got a favourable order but my wife filed an appeal for it which also got in favour of me. Now I filed a criminal mc in the high court to quash the 498A but the single bench is not getting it quashed even though I have a divisional bench mat appeal order to prove my innocence.
1. What can I do if it is not getting quashed?
2. Where can I go for a appeal for it .
3. is it possible for a single bench to ignore divisional bench order.
4. What I can do if the justice is biased or to whom I should approach to lodge a complaint against the biased justice?
Arman arora
11 March 2015 at 00:05
Hello,
My wife file case under IPC IPC 376/498A/323/342/506/324/406.
We got engagement on 3-12-2012 and that during the courtship period some personal disputes have arosen between my wife and family. So our engagement got break down.
Later 4-11-2013 she filed fake complaint against for rape and dowry. later get compromised and got married on 4-2-2014.
later 11-4-2014, she left my home and went to parental house.
later 22-12-2014, she filled 498A from faridabad and 376 from gurgaon on date 24-12-2014.
i was in custody for 49 days and got bail after filling compromised letter by my wife.
my life is like heal now days.
kindly help me out what i can do to get it over.
regards
ganesh kumar
10 March 2015 at 22:56
'A' has lodged a false FIR against 'B'. In the investigation it has been revealed by the IO before the concern Magistrate that the FIR is false. Can B bring a defamation under criminal proceedings against A at this stage? Final report has not been filed but likely to be filed very soon.
Is a criminal complaint for defamation is maintainable?
what are the other remedies for B against A.
tushar
10 March 2015 at 22:21
Dear All,
I have a proprietory firm from past 3 yrs in mumbai, i now want to change its name (it will remain as proprietory firm), is there any legal formulaties for the same or i can directly apply for new set of documents in new name and open a bank account in new name.
I have Service Tax Cert in old name and a bank account.
sandip
10 March 2015 at 22:06
I was granted interim bail for 14 days in the first day of appeal in case u/s 323/325/341/379/506/34. after 14 days my anticipatory interim bail was extended till june.my question is that my bail can be confirmed or not in the month of june?
Subhash Chandra Tuteja
10 March 2015 at 21:24
1/A Suit was filed in yr 2007 by gr A (two Brothers) on gr B(other Bro & Sis) for Title of a land area 0.59 acre. My Father C was also made a party who interfering in our family matter by insisting party B for partition with intention to grab the land. Gr A & B Compromised and got decree from lok adalat .
2/ Appeal instituted by gr B on gr A and my father was again made a party .Again Gr A & B Compromised and got decree from permanent lok adalat .
3/ Both case my father was ex parte (saman/notice was return with refusal of my father & witness were not our neighbour some one else ).
4/ my father purchased land area 0.59 acre from a zamidar in Yr1960 and also won the case against heir of zamidar in yr 1965.
5/Gr A & B Exhibit zamabondbust 1928-29 in which their g/father was mourski krishak and did not exhibit any other papers against disputed land .They exhibit another document(plain paper) sign by 14 village's persons for their possession since their g/father time.
6/ my father sold land area 0.03 acre in yr 1985 june to six persons whose other land was behind of this land for a path 12ft wide. Balance land area 0.56 acre was given to me against unregistered fmly settlement in yr 1985 july and got muted land in my name in yr 1987 . A pce of land sold for my sister marriage in yr1989 and two other parts were sold in yr 1995.the Balance land area 0.48 acre was in my name since then.
6/ In yr 2007 land was parted in 5 pieces & It was in the name of 11 persons in revenue recorded.but they were not made a party to it.
7/ As balance land .48 acre was in my name since from 1995 I filed a suit in Feb yr 2009 against all above brother & sisters. Both lower Distt courts pass TITLE decree in my favour and null and void above decree for not making me a party in their suit.
8/ High court admitted the case and setting a substantial question of law ABOVE SAID DECREE (YR 2007) IS BINDING ON ME ALSO AS MY FATHER WAS A PARTY.
9/ Party A & B gave false statements in their synopsis/fact of case before H’ble HC are
1) My Father was made party as he was claiming it is his land.
2) In year 2000-01 the land was transfer in the name of party A & B from their G/father.
3) In case file by me Yr 2009 pleaded I am owner of the land area 0.59 acre
Statement 1 never said before and statement 2 said in their origin suit (2007) and exhibit for another land hand written and sign by patwari which was also wrong (In 2000-01 this land was in my name).
Statement 3 just to mislead they stated full land area 0.59 acre instead part land area 0.48 acre
R/Sir ,
1) As responded could not object at the time of admission of case but can it be objected letter on ?
2) If yes, Under What act we can put application?
3) In Decree yr 2007 my father was made a dummy & unimportant party as per their pleading.
Can a title (compromised) decree will be binding on him?
4) Once both lower courts said the decree passed in 2007 is null & void then without discussion on its nullity can be the second question arises?
DARSHNA
10 March 2015 at 21:06
When the Class I heirs are alive, and the names of Class II heirs came on records (7/12, 6A etc) before the names of class I heirs then
(1) is there a need to follow procedure first to include the names of class I heirs before deleting the names of class II heirs?
or
(2) can the application to includes the names of class I heirs and deleting the names of class II heirs can be filed simultaneously
[ the names of abovementioned class II heirs came on record after the death of their mother who was the class I heir]
(3) what is the limitation period to delete the names of class II heirs from the date of their inclusion on the records?
(4) what will be the procedures when the names of class II heirs came on record before class I heirs, how to remove it ?
what is the solution if class II heirs objecting the inclusion of names of class I heirs because their names first appeared on record and took objections against the said class I heirs before talathi and circle officer?
Expecting your earliest reply.
Thanks in advance
Darshna
R.Padmavathi
10 March 2015 at 20:31
Sir,I have old DDs drawn in favour of Greater Visakhapatnam municipal corporation and misplaced them and found now.I contacted the bank people either to encash or revalidate the DDs but they refused to do so as they want me to produce the old employee who signed for the DDs but the employee left the job long back and cannot be traced.Help me find the solution in this issue.Iam ready to produce a notary copy or indemnity bond to the bank.Kindly help me to solve this issue.
anilkumargupta
10 March 2015 at 20:10
DEAR SIRS,
please give me the jurisdiction details for filling divorce petition.
At where to file petiton. as pre following situation-
boy is living at jaipur and girl's parents at jaipur. and girl is living at delhi for job. marriage was held at jaipur.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can a house on navin parti land be demolished even afetr 15 years
Hi ,
One of my friend has made a house on land recorded as Navin Parti ( Gram sabha land) in Uttar pradesh.He is of upper caste and invested lots of money on house.the house was built 15 years ago.Now due to enemity one of his neighbour is threatening him to lodge a complaint at sdm office due to construction of house on navin parti land.
Is there any way to get this land converted in his name or Can he get patta /lease of the land?
becasue i have heard that navin parti land can be used for bulding houses etc and can also be alotted on patta.Is there any risk of demolition of his house if complaint is lodged?