Anonymous
18 May 2017 at 21:14
Namaste
I have few queries about this topic..Please help..
1.i have a civil case in session court in which court relieved me in November 2016.but my lawyer didn't inform me about this.now i have some issues with my lawyer so i asked him to give me my file back then only i come to know that i m relieved in November already and case is dis missed because lawyer from opposition was not coming on hearings.I have already paid him his fixed fee which was 11k +4 k (mis exp)..Now he is asking for fee 5 times to his fee and for hearing separately...Is this ethical that he didn't informed me about decision and asked me to arrange money for settlement in may2017 whereas I got decision in my favour in nov 2016..What should I do??Please help
Anonymous
18 May 2017 at 20:58
Namaste
I have few queries about this topic..Please help..
1.i have a civil case in session court in which court relieved me in November 2016.but my lawyer didn't inform me about this.now i have some issues with my lawyer so i asked him to give me my file back then only i come to know that i m relieved in November already and case is dis missed because lawyer from opposition was not coming on hearings.I have already paid him his fixed fee which was 11k +4 k (mis exp)..Now he is asking for fee 5 times to his fee and for hearing separately...Is this ethical that he didn't informed me about decision and asked me to arrange money for settlement in may2017 whereas I got decision in my favour in nov 2016..What should I do??Please help
Adv M.D.Azhar
18 May 2017 at 20:52
Respected sir, my client has filed a complain u/s. 138 of N.I.Act to recover rs. 3.50.000/- from the accused. accused is a brother of the complainant and therefore he was in need. In the trial defense of the accused was that his cheques were lost and accused did theft of it. we replied about that notice. During the cross examination of the complainant defense lawyer asked that r.u tax payer, he admitted than complainant submitted copies of the return from i.t. In those return amount withdrawn per year is less than the amount of the cheque so in that circumstances accused can be acquitted or it can be said that he has rebutted the burden as per sec. 139 of N.I. Act. i have read the judgment of the Honorable Delhi High court, LEKH RAJ SHARMA VS. YASH PAL GUPTA in which hon'ble h.c. held that to file less return and keeping the unaccounted money is the matter between Income Tax Department and the complainant. I need to know that can this judgment is helpful to me or accused has rebutted the presumption. kindly guide me to short out the issue.
Ankita Dutta
18 May 2017 at 20:43
Dear sir,
I am facing a lot of issues with my husband ffor the last few months. He is having relationship with other women in his office and I have certain proofs of messages and phone calls that would be in my favor. Since I'm 5 months pregnant (housewife) and my father is a retired person so I'm mainly concerned about my unborn child financially. Please guide me as it's impossible to stay with this kind of person as it's giving a lot of stress during this critical time of pregnancy. I want a separation. Please help.
Ankita Dutta.
RANJEET B SINGH
18 May 2017 at 20:19
1.can gift deed executed on current period and gift was received in the year 2008-09 as cash from various relatives
Babu
18 May 2017 at 20:18
Hello experts,
On January 2005 I agreed to purchase a property for Rs.1,85,01,000 (Rupees One crore eighty five lakhs one thousand), This amount is entered in the sale agreement dated January 2005 which is about twice the government valuation in 2005.
The Seller terminated the contract prematurely.
A suit for specific performance was filed on April 2005 after paying 7.5% of the total consideration as stamp duty, which amounted to Rs.13,87,575 under section 47(A) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act.
The case was decreed for specific performance. The suit was contested all the way to the Supreme Court.
EP was filed and the District court ordered registration of property on April 2017.
On April 2017 the Sub-registrar instructed me to pay 7% stamp duty and 1% registration charge. I paid it and registered it.
After a month of me trying to get the document released, the Sub-registrar sent me a notice stating the registered instrument is deficient in stamp duty as per present valuation, i.e year 2017 valuation.
I submitted my pleadings explaining that the stamp duty has already been paid and that it is also reflected in the decree mentioning “a court fee of Rs. 13,87,575.50 paise (7.5%) is paid there on Under section 47(A) of Tamil Nadu Court Fees Act.”.
In even mentioned that I have paid extra stamp duty of 7%. He refuses to accept it and is demanding full payment as per current valuation. He shows me his valuation on a piece of paper scribbled with pencil.
I am yet to notify the EP court.
What should I do?
Anonymous
18 May 2017 at 19:48
Hi, my friend she was married in arya samaj in april2014 with not complete willingness (kind of emotional blackmailing by guy and his family) after 6 mnth she applied for divorce . While the case was in court she got to know that her husband was a divorcee which he didn't mentioned in arya samaj marriage registration form (wrote unmarried) and nor submitted divorce decree of his previous marriage as per arya samaj marriage registration form. Will it be considered as cheating and put cheating case while divorce case is in court.he is working as a manager in some company. Please guide what should be gone. Thank you
SUKRIT KUMAR
18 May 2017 at 18:14
We are Agra based company. We had filed a Civil suite for recovery of dues from a Delhi based Company. The defendant filed the Written Statement without authorisation from the Board of Director's resolution. Our lawyer did not file the objection nor did the learned judge in the High Court noticed it. Even at the time of Cross examination, their employee did not produce the Board Resolution inspite of asking my junior lawyer. I believe that their lawyer/s don't have the authorisation. My new lawyer has filed a request for additional issues in this regard. Case is in arguments stage. Can we raise these issues at this stage.Guidance & advice from all of you will
will help us a lot.
Thanks & Best Regards
Sukrit
Kantilal
18 May 2017 at 17:06
What if the mutual agreement made between the three brothers regarding a Bunglow property is not registered on that date.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Religious Dress permissible
Hi,
I am currently working in a pvt company from last 7 months and I am a practicing Muslim and usually I am wearing islami dress (turban (saafa) and khandress, thobe) and from last 7 months on every Friday continuously I m wearing turban and in rest of days I m wearing Islamic cap (topi).. Now I m warned for the same and forced to be in a formal dress as there is no one is follows such like things ... I want to know is any law against the same so which can help me....
Regards,
Syed sarwar showkat shah