Baskaran Kanakasabai
08 July 2010 at 23:20
Acknowledgement
The primary objective of the presentation titled “The flaw in the law” is to get the LA Act, 1894 amended in respect of addition of a section to that law to prescribe for the compulsory registrability of the notification u/s 4 (1).
The proposed Land Titling Bill 2010 of the Govt. of India, proposes the very same point .
Therefore, I consider it time now to acknowledge the valuable help and support rendered by
Sri. R.K.Makkad, Sri. Niranjan, Sri.Aravindan s/o Ganesan, Ms.Parveen Agarwal ,Sri. Assumiki, Sri. Y.V.Vishweshvar Rao, Sri.Kiran Kumar, Sri.A.V.Vishal,Smt.Rakhi Budhiraja, Sri.Rajeev, Ms.UmaParameswaran, Sri.Devajyoti Barman, ,Sri.Bagwat Patil, ,Sri.Arup Kumar Gupta,Sri.Ram Samudre, , Sri.ShasiKumar, Sri.Chanchal Nag Chowdhury, Sri.Pawan Sharma,Sri.Parthasarathi Loganathan, Sri.SKJ,Ms.Archana,Sri.B.K.Raghavendra Rao,Sri.Daksh,Ms.RuchiGupta,Sri.SivaSubramanian,Sri.MuraliKrishna,Sri.MukulAggarwal,Sri.VirendarPankaj,Sri.K.C.Suresh,Sri.Mahendrakumar,Sri.Kamaraj Bharathy and others
in the process of clarification of my doubts and thus towards the structure of my presentation titled “the Flaw in the Law”
Though the extent of contribution ranges from the low to high on a scale of 1 to 1000, I sincerely thank each and every one.
If there is one person to be mentioned in isolation by virtue of maximum contribution, it is none other than Sri.R.K.Makkad.
I thank the Supreme Courts of the United Kingdom,Singapore, Australia, and NewZealand, the U.K.Law Commission, and Mrs Ang Moo San of Singapore Land Authority for their kind and express contribution in this regard.
I also thank Sri. S.V.Nahar and Sri.Sudershan Goel of lawguru.com in this regard.
My special thanks should go to the administration of lawyersclubindia.com and lawguru.com and the inventor of internet for providing the plat form to materialize the whole 3 months old story.
If I had left out some one’s name in the list of contributors, kindly pardon me.
Thank you all, Ladies and Gentlemen!
Tirthankar Pal
08 July 2010 at 11:24
Dear Sir,
I have an IT diploma [DOEACC B-Level]from DOEACC Society [A scientific society under Ministry of Communications and Information Technology-www.doeacc.edu.in]that is recognized as equivalent to Master degree by Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India. A notification in this regard has already been sent by MHRD. The professional qualification has been acquired in full-time mode in 5.5 years after 10+2.
Some Recognitions of B-Level:-
1) MCA by Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
2) B.S. (Computer Science) in USA from an accredited institution/university
3) Applied Bachelors in Canada - Canadian Community Colleges
4) B.Sc(Hons) [4 year] in UK [King's College London - World Rank 24th and having 8 nobel laureates]
5) Accepted for PhD in BioInformatics by University of Sussex - UK.
6) IT Engineer in Japan [Higher than an University Engineering Graduate]
7) Certified IT Project Manager Associate in Singapore [Singapore Computer Society]
8) Accepted for M.Tech in Indian Statistical Institute, IIIT-Bangalore, IIIT-Hyderabad, IIT-Kharagpur, IIT-Guwahati
9) Eligible for PhD in MIS in IIM Kolkata.
10) Eligible for CAT conducted by IIMs
11) Eligible for GATE conducted by IISc and IITs
[I have all the documents with me]
It has come to my notice that a handful of private companies are openly disregarding the notification of MHRD and are not allowing students [my juniors] to sit for technical/HR tests for employment in these companies on the pretext that these companies donot recognize DOEACC qualifications. When my juniors have demanded a written document why they[companies] donot recognize the qualification, the companies are unable to produce any such documents.
Is this a case of discrimination?
Anonymous
07 July 2010 at 12:57
MY QUERRY IS REGARDING DETAILS OF COMPOSITION SCHEME UNDER CHHATTISGARH VAT ACT. SPECIFIC POINTS ARE:
1. WHETHER INTERSTATE PURCHASES ARE COVERED UNDER COMPOSITION BY GIVING C FORM.
2. WHETHER SUB CONTRACTOR IS EXEMPT FROM TAX IF TAKEN FORM 3 FROM MAIN CONTRACTOR.
Siddaraju
06 July 2010 at 12:07
Dear Sir
My father has got a property of 3.5 acres from karnataka government in 1994, with condition of not to sell any one up to fifteen years.
Since my father and his brother not yet divided there ancestral property, now they are asking equal part in above property also.
Is my uncle is having right to get part in which my father has got from government or not, if yes how can we cant do.
Umesh
05 July 2010 at 17:58
Dear Sir/ Madam,
A property under redevelopment fetches Rs 100 per member.Of which Rs 30 is corpus and the balance is Rs 70 that is the rent component spread over 3 years for the rehabilitation that the flat owners will have to manage with.
a)Since the Rs 30 is given in lieu with a
vision that the tax rates/ maintenance
will be higher once the owners move
into the new construction, should it
be in the first place considered as a
source of income and taxed as it bound
to perish and hence is an estimated
expense?
b) Wrt Rs 70, why would this attract tax
if its a provision paid in advance and
will be distributed over the 3 years?
In any and both the cases mentioned,there is no gain at all and hence the capital tax gain or short term tax again should not be applicable as there is no sale of plot/propert at all.Its purely a trade-off and I will seek your expert advice in this case as we are undergoing a circustance quoted above.
Thanxking You'll in Advance
Anonymous
05 July 2010 at 13:15
I have inherited 1/3 rd share of property which is around 1000 sq feet of total 3000 feet from my grandfathers brother ( A ) via an unregistered will who was unmarried and hence had no issue. The remaining parts belong to 1, my father and 2, my chacha (B)who is causing me trouble .
The entire proerty is one building which is lesed out and rents recieved by me, my father and my chacha , it was leased in year 2000 the property 1/3rd was mutated in my favour in year 2002.
Now my chacha is keen on challenging the will, as he has natural right on the property to some extent as there are some other uncles ( A's other brothers sons n total there can 8 claimants ) who also become the natural heirs of the said part if the will is revoked.
my quetion is
1) Can the will be challenged aftr 16 years of the death , as A died in 1994
2)Since 1994 there has been no claim does the law of adverse posseion apply
3) Mutation in my favour 2002 does it make my sitation any better
4) I am drawing rent since 2000 from the same building frm where my chacha is withrawing rent doe it not make obvious that he has accepted m as true onerof the land
Will the law of estoople help
5)I would like to draw your attention on the fact that the property which I have inherited was self acquired by my uncle in 1989 and the unregistered will is type written on the stamp paper of 2 Rs on the back of which the purchase date of the stamp paper is mentioned as oct 1993 and my uncle passed away in march 1994 , the will was executed in oct 1994 .Does this fact make my side any heavier
6)the will is not probated but mutation is done can my chacha alone file a suit against the will as his part of claim 1/8th of the land in question .
What are other legal remedies available to me.
Victor
05 July 2010 at 11:50
Does any one please tell us how to obtain a valuation certificate for a residential house from Hyderabad Municipality?
1) What documents required to submit to them
2) How many days it would take normally as per rules
3) Do we have any fees for it?
deepak K Gujrati
03 July 2010 at 08:38
Sir,
I have purchase a land in city. The sale deed of the seller does not bear the Aaragi No. The seller has purchased the property from a person who has accquired the property under a will. The Will also does not bear the aaraji No. All the deeds bear house no, At the time of purchase it was told that in city properties are purchased and sold on house no . I have received yellow card and got mutation completed. But when I approach Banks for housing loan, they are asking araji no in earlier deed also. Now the question is :1. What is importance of Khatauni 2. In absence of that Whether my title is defective 3.How to get my name on Khatauni records when my earlier holders have not done so and not mentioned araji no sale deeds.
This is very urgent. Please advice
deepak K Gujrati
03 July 2010 at 08:32
Sir,
I have purchase a land in city. The sale deed of the seller does not bear the Aaragi No. The seller has purchased the property from a person who has accquired the property under a will. The Will also does not bear the aaraji No. All the deeds bear house no, At the time of purchase it was told that in city properties are purchased and sold on house no . I have received yellow card and got mutation completed. But when I approach Banks for housing loan, they are asking araji no in earlier deed also. Now the question is :1. What is importance of Khatauni 2. In absence of that Whether my title is defective 3.How to get my name on Khatauni records when my earlier holders have not done so and not mentioned araji no sale deeds.
This is very urgent. Please advice
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
registrability under the proposed Land titling bill 2010
Under the proposed Land Titling Bill 2010,
notification u/s 4(1), declaration u/s 6 and award u/s 15(of LA Act,1894) are all compulsorily registrable, All lis pendens as well is compulsorily registrable.
Comments and views please!