Anonymous
02 September 2010 at 14:47
Dear Sir,
Wanted a Labour consultant person in South Bangalore.
Please provide me contact details
Rakesh
02 September 2010 at 11:00
Can anybody give me a link where i can find
LLM(Law & Social Transformation in India,Indian Constitutional Law,Judicial Process,Law of Industrial & Intellectual Property,Legal Regulation of Economic Enterprises,Law of Export-Import Regulation)
Books Free on Torrent z or other website?
Anonymous
02 September 2010 at 10:58
Hi All
We are in the process of setting up an inhouse call centre of around 15 people. We come under Bombay Shop & Establishment Act. Our HR policy says 36 Paid Leaves per annum and 4 months PIP against non performance with 3 months notice pay. However for these call centre executives, we would like to propose 21 leaves per annum as defined in the act and 01 month PIP with 01 months notice pay. Can somebody advice if we can adopt different policies for different class of employees.
S.N.Derashri
01 September 2010 at 21:56
Let me know any ruling either from SC. or any other HC that passing an order of compusory retirement simultaneously dropping the pending DE amounts to dismissal in guise and not an order of compulsory retirement simplisiter in public interest. It is urgent.
V.G.Rao Advocate
01 September 2010 at 14:43
Hi all,
My friend's father purchased a house property ad measuring 270 sq.yds in the name of my friend when he was minor in the capacity of guardian under a Notarized agreement of sale by paying entire sale consideration in the year 1987. Subsequently the father of my friend expired leaving behind his three daughters and my friend as his legal heirs.since the property stands in the name of my friend he made three portions of the aforesaid property and has executed two registered gift deeds for 40 sq.yds each in favor of his two elder sisters out of love and affection and handed over the possession to them, but he has not registered any document in favor of his third sister as her husband is not good by character but has delivered third portion consisting of 40 sq.yds to stay in as permissive possessors, and the remaining area of 135 odd sq.yds property portion he executed a registered gift deed in favor of his wife.The vendors under the agreement of sale are not disputing the possession of my friend nor the sale transaction, but to surprise of my friend his third sister without his knowledge has executed a registered gift deed in favor of her husband the portion claiming it to be ancestral property and given a new municipal number to the said portion which was not in existence at any point of time and apart the boundaries under the registered gift deed are not tallying under her occupation as a permissive possessors , and her husband in turn sold the property to third parties who recently dismantled the said portion and at present the said portion is open land and vacant, in such circumstances what are the legal remedies available to my friend to safe guard his interest and rights over the property of the said portion.Since the property purchased by his father was under agreement of sale, as on date property tax receipts were issued by the municipal authorties in the column of Owner as "PO"
Krati
01 September 2010 at 13:35
Does any body have rates of stamp duty as applicable in different States updated upto 31st July, 2010?
if yes please please give me along with its source (if possible)
Regards
Krati
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
01 September 2010 at 13:34
sir,
can anybody provide the following citation urgently :
1988(3)scc(crl)822
it is on the notification on wild life protection act.
SALIL KUMAR.P
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY-670101
9447536929
advocatesalil@gmail.com
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
01 September 2010 at 12:02
sir,
in one of my case, the allegation is that 4 accused persons showed a knife to the defacto-complainant and snatched a gold chain from him and subsequently after so many days, gave it to the 5 th accused to sell the gold ornament.here the offences charged against the accused are u/s 392, 398, r/w 34 of IPC against accused No. 1 to 4 and an offence u/s 414 of IPC seperately.
now , in this case, charge has been framed and denied by the accused,summons has been issued to the witnesses.
now, my doubt is that, here the only sessions offence is 398 IPC. it requires 5 or more persons to commit the offence. but, here, in this case, even though now there are 5 accused persons, at the time of commission of offence there were only 4 accused persons. or in otherwords, accused No.5 has not ever took part in the dacoity at all, the only allegation against her is that she has assisted in concealment of stolen property (u/s 414 IPC).
so, according to me 398 will not lie as there were only 4 accused persons at the time of dacoity.
if at all, 392 may lie.so, 392 IPC and the other offence charged against accused No. 5 , 414 IPC, is also an offence triable by magistrate only.but, now, as sec. 398 has been incorporated now it is in sessions court.now, charge has been framed and denied by the accused. so, i cannot argue for discharge also.
what is the remedy ?
SALIL KUMAR.P
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY-670101
9447536929
advocatesalil@gmail.com
Santosh kumar Sonker
31 August 2010 at 21:37
sir, kripa bataye ki mera ex parte divorce 21/10/2009 ko ho gaya.meri wife ne divorce ka 27/07/2009 ka jabalpur(MP) family court ka notice lene se mana kar diya aur kanpur ke thane me 498a ke tahat 02/08/2010 ko FIR meri family or 13 logo ke khilaf darj karwa diya.maine allahabad high court se stay liya stay chargesheet tak raha. chargesheet bhi pesh hui usme police ek bhi naam nahi hataya sabhi ke khilaaf chargesheet pesh kar di.maine chargesheet ke khilaaf allahabad high court me apeal ki parantu high court mediation and concilition centre me case pahucha diya. mere case divorce 21/10/2009 ko ho gaya aur maine local court se 21/08/2010 ko dusri shaadi bhi kar lee. ab aap mujhe bataye ki aise me kya hoga. high court ka order yah hai-
"Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A.The dispute seems to be between husband and wife. Having gone through the record, I primafacie find that the parties should be given a chance to settle their differences on their own terms
through the process of mediation and conciliation.Let this order be placed before the Registrar/Inchargeof 'Allahabad High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre'. The Registrar/Incharge of the Mediation Centre will issue notices to both
the parties fixing a date for their personal appearances at the centre before the mediator by the Organizing Secretary of the Mediation Centre.
Mediator/Conciliator is allowed three months' time to find a possible solution of disputes between the parties.
The case will be listed before the appropriate Bench in week commencing 29.11.2010 along with the report of conciliator. The applicants are directed to deposit Rs. 10,000/- at the Mediation Centre within one week for the expenses to be borne by respondent no. 2 and he will also take steps to serve respondent no. 2
through registered post within three days form today. The applicants undertake to appear at the Mediation Centre on every date fixed for mediation.
Meanwhile, further proceedings of Case crime No. 1031 of 2009, under Sections 498A, 323, 504,506 IPC and ¾ D.P. Act, P.S. Kalyanpur, Distrt Kanpur Nagar shall remain stayed.In case of default in deposit of Rs. 10,000/- or to appear before the Mediation Centre on the date fixed, whichever is earlier the stay order shall stand automatically vacated.
The report of the Mediation Centre will include a note about the deposit of Rs. 10,000/- and appearances of the applicants on the date fixed at the Mediation Centre.
Order Date :- 11.8.2010
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
MACT Act
Can anyone give me any recent judgement of any HC or SC which says that the claim amount as awarded by the tribunals are to be / not to be deducted of TDS by the insurance cos. mainly in the case of compensation amounts awarded in Accident cases.