Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 10:43
what are the rules regarding donation of human body for science in our country and especially in A.P. Is it a must for the donor to obtain the consent of the legal heirs? Is the person not having right to donate his body as he likes?
Anonymous
11 February 2011 at 18:01
DEAR SIR,
PLEASE CLARIFY-
1. ARE LAWYERS AND DOCTORS NOW UNDER THE PERVIEW OF SERVICE TAX?
2. IF IT IS A LAWYERS FIRM THEN THEY ARE SUPPOSE TO COLLECT THE SERVICE TAX FROM THEIR CLIENTS BUT IF IT IS AN INVIDUAL LAWYER HE NEED NOT COLLECT THE SERVICE TAx IS THIS CORRECT?
3. I AM TOLD THAT EVEN THE LAWYERS FIRM DONT HAVE TO COLLECT THE SERVIE TAX FROM INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS BUT ONLY FROM SOCIETIES. IS THIS CORRECT?
Anonymous
11 February 2011 at 17:21
1. Municipal Water charges
Where there are diffrent sizes of flats in a co-operative society (CHS) can the CHS charge to a larger flat, more than the standard charges of Rs.160/- per flat (irrespective of size of flats), charged by the municipality? If a CHS charges more than Rs.160 (per a larger flat), will it not tantamount to profiteering from members?
2.Certain common areas, services, facilities and amenities are not listed in CHS bye laws. Eg. bore well, sewage treatment, diesel generator, gym/club house etc. According to spirit of law,cost of running and operating these common failities etc are "service charges" to be equally shared by all members irrespective of size of flats. Can a Managing Committee take law in its own hands and design a method of charging based on size/are of flats?
3. By law, is Nomination mandatory or discretionery? Can non-submission of this Form be a valid reason to deny a member his Share Certificate?
Anonymous
11 February 2011 at 14:23
I PURCHASE LAND IN 1987,FROM BHOIR FAMILY.AND ON 7/12 NOT NAMEED ON MY NAME. WHAT PROCEDURE OF RENAME OF ME.AND TAHISILDAR SAYS THIS PROPERTY IN KUL KAYADA AND WHEN U PURCHASED THE LANDTAKE PERMISSION OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT FIRST.
meenakshi chauhan
11 February 2011 at 12:15
as i have mentioned before also.. there is one criminal case pending against my parents.
when the complainant made the first complaint letter to EOW, it was transfered by them to local police. when the complainant came to know about this he met many police officers including special police commissioner mr.ranjeet naraian and then moved one letter in EOW in the name of DCP.
stating that i have met concerned police commissioners, particularly naming mr.ranjeet narain , spl. CP. he wrote that i have made them verbal request to get the case registered with EOW only and not local police.
and then just after that letter EOW registered his complaint with them without calling the transfered complaint back. or without asking the status of complaint transfered to local police.
by the RTI application i demanded that letter from EOW, but they removed that letter from record and stated me that complainant has moved the same complaint second time also..
i have small video of that letter and a pic of that..
EOW HAS REMOVED THAT LETTER FROM RECORD COZ THAT CAN EFFECT SOME SENIOR OFFICERS..
what shall i do..
can the case disclose that all.... do the police maintain any such record in that case diary.. that can help me.. please suggest what can i do .. as the picture is not that clear..
prithwish sengupta
10 February 2011 at 17:33
can i avail cenvat credit of service tax on commission paid to real esate agent aganist service tax paid on rental income of commercial property.
please refer the respective circular if any.
thanks.
Anonymous
10 February 2011 at 15:16
As per section 621a what does compound refer to :
a)condone a liability in exchange for money
b)condone an offence in exchange for money
c)to settle by mutual agreement
d) all of the above
Anonymous
10 February 2011 at 11:22
I am respondent in a normal matrimonial petition filed u/s 13(1) (ia) filed by my wife. The case is simple and no adverse allegations are in the case. After five dates the case is at issue stage now. No one can predict how much time it will take now onwards. Meanwhile I have good job offer from abroad. But two years bond is to be signed. I have let them my position of case and they have agreed to send me back once or twice if required during the bond period. There is no Criminal case of any kind is pending against me.
My queries are
1] After determining issues what is the remaining procedure and approximately how much time now onwards it will take?
2] On the date fixed for hearing (cross examination of witness / proof) no hearing is done or petitioner deliberately to harass me apply for adjournment and I cannot make it to come again on next date and judgment is given in favour of petitioner due to non-presence of me, can I appeal in the concerned Hon’ble High Court against the Judgment?
Anonymous
10 February 2011 at 11:20
I am respondent in a normal matrimonial petition filed u/s 13(1) (ia) filed by my wife. The case is simple and no adverse allegations are in the case. After five dates the case is at issue stage now. No one can predict how much time it will take now onwards. Meanwhile I have good job offer from abroad. But two years bond is to be signed. I have let them my position of case and they have agreed to send me back once or twice if required during the bond period. There is no Criminal case of any kind is pending against me.
My queries are
1] After determining issues what is the remaining procedure and approximately how much time now onwards it will take?
2] On the date fixed for hearing (cross examination of witness / proof) no hearing is done or petitioner deliberately to harass me apply for adjournment and I cannot make it to come again on next date and judgment is given in favour of petitioner due to non-presence of me, can I appeal in the concerned Hon’ble High Court against the Judgment?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rent Act.
I filed release application against Tenants (commercial) in Prescribed authority/Trial Court U/s 21(a) u.p. rent control act 1972. Trial court rejects my application on bonafide need because there are two ancestral houses in other district and as well as on comparative hardship of Tenants that Goodwill will be suffer if he evicted.
In appeal ADJ court also reject on bonafide need because there are two ancestral houses in other district but finding on comparative Hardship is Totally against Tenants that NO HARDSHIP if he evict because shop practically closed since so many years.
This is the First case I heard that on bonafide need finding against Landlord as well as on Comparative Hardship finding against Tenants.
What was the Future of this case?
Any Apex court citation where this type of case discussed?