rajesh
13 February 2011 at 14:48
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
RAM MAHADEO RISBUD
12 February 2011 at 19:42
Respected Sir,
Please give your valuable advice on the following issue :-
I have free hold plot of 1475 Sq ft on which I have done home improvement by constructing two rooms on first floor( 300 Sq ft carpet)on Existing ground floor ( 802 Sq ft carpet area, Built up area 72.37 Sq m + two balconies 4.5 m x 1.2 m and 5.64 m x 1.2 m attached to slab as per old sanctioned plan by Gram panchayat). Ratable value for this existing ground floor construction for residential was Rs 3050. The New Ratable value now charged by Pune Municipal Corporation for residential is Rs 8250/-. Because of construction of two rooms on first floor remaining portion of existing earlier slab has been taken as terrace though it is open to sky. The two balconies mentioned above are also open to sky..Also earlier ratable value was with car parking. However in new ratable value they have added car parking area (30 SQ ft) which is not covered (open to sky). The new ratable value by addition of 300 Sq ft seems to be very high..Please provide the rules for calculation of ratable value in my case. Kindly suggest the remedial measures to get correct ratable value to my property.
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 18:14
I'm planning to purchase a shop in the ground floor of a flat being constructed after demolition of a house where I was a tenant for a similar shop room.I want a parking space for my personal four wheeler at least for the time my shop will be open.Promoter is demanding extra money for giving me open parking.What is my position as per the recent Supreme Court verdict about parking rights in a flat?
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 15:49
Dear all,
I am working in Rajasthan with a public limited company which is making cement and for that company having mining rights. My company is a part of group company and now my company's all assets and liabilities transfer in the name of group company,in the nature of amalgamation, Issue is of transfer of mining rights in the name of amalgamating company, Normally as per few decesions of Honable Gujrat court stamp duty should be payble is on Rs.100. But finance ministry of rajasthan asked for duty amt of 4% of market value of share given to transferor company by transferee company so anyone suggest me law or any case regarding this matter
Anonymous
12 February 2011 at 15:22
Central Excise being leviable on sale (clearance) of online-CNG at the outlet located in front portion of Industrial land, would such activity be considered Industrial use of the same industrial land ?
If not, why ?
.Arya
12 February 2011 at 14:24
Dear
I want to register a Group Housing Society, kindly give advice for same
its documentation/ procedures/ legal formalities etc.
i m waiting for some professional advice for same
regards
.Arya
anish
12 February 2011 at 13:37
I have given my residential properties on leave & license basis in Gujarat.As far as i know the licensee in Gujarat donot get benefit under rent control act for properties let out after 2001 till 2011 due to ammendment in Bombay Rent Control Act. The said exemption is to be further extendede for ten years from 2011. In case my licensees donot vacate the premises in future am i protected because licensee donot get any benefit or protection under rent act in Gujarat ? In short would court rule in my favour if i have to get the premise vacated ?
ABDUS SAMAD ANSARI
12 February 2011 at 13:20
Please any one provide me details of colleges and institute provideing evening regular course in LLB
and the same institutes who have admission eligibility of BCOm from correspondence and CA
namrata patil
12 February 2011 at 11:41
In 1957 land owner is Mr.Joshi and we purchased it in 1980.When we purchased it that time on 7/12 utara owner name is Mr.Joshi.After that we soul it from 1980.Plz tel how we our name on 7/12 utara.Is it possible bez my lawyer charged from us Rs.50000/- till date.And we didnt get solution on it.
What to do now?
Thanks in advance.Plz reply urgent bez we have hearing in next month and wanted to solve this problem.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT 1956 - C FORMS
SOME OF OUR CUSTOMERS ARE ISSUING FORM-C CLUBBING I QUARTER BILLS ALONG WITH II QUARTER BILLS. WHEN WE ASKED THEM TO ISSUE SEPARATE FORM FOR DIFFERENT QUARTERS, THEY SAY INVOICE VERIFIED DATES ARE MENTIONED IN THE ANNEXURE TO THE FORM AND CAN'T ISSUE SEPARATE FORM. IS IT ACCEPTABLE