Master the Science Behind Firearm Evidence. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

deepak   10 March 2011 at 12:40

Kul Kayda

Please guide me regarding the following matter My grandfather has got some land from government before 54 years back. That time he has appointed (1971 approx date) one outsider labor work & paid money to his labour . & we have enough proof of this labor agreement ( Majuree Pautee ) now the stated land is accrued that fellow & register related documents in his name under KUL KAYADA & 1975 our name is there & after 1976 our name is removed will take over the land, last 30 year we fight with him & we fill the case in 1980 but some family (during that time my father was sentenced in prison related murder case.) problem we not continues & my father continues case again in 1990 but till date we not stratify.

Best Regards,
Deepak Deshmukh

francisray   10 March 2011 at 11:54

share in the property

guide

essycherianantony   10 March 2011 at 07:59

lien on fixed deposit

As security for fulfilling employment bond period, my Company has stipulated that fixed deposit receipt in the name of the surety, and lien marked to my Company should be submitted to the Company.The Company will release this FDR when the bond period is over.

In the event of the employee abandoning the company without the permission of the company, what is the procedure to encash the amount in the fixed deposit by the company?

G.Nagarajeshwar Rao   09 March 2011 at 22:20

Partition and Shares in Muslim Law / decree against dead person

My friend filed a civil suit for partition of house/s property of Muslims. Father died, suit filed by male person [sole son] of the deceased father. The property is his father's property. His mother and sisters as well as tenants were made as parties to the suit. The suit filed in the year 2002. The suit decreed in exparte in the year 2009 and preliminary decree is passed. The first defendant i.e. mother of the plaintiff died in the year 2004. But my friend did not informed to the court, though all the legal heirs of deceased mother are on record. Now the suit is decreed against the dead person. Can he file the final decree ask the shares at present entitlement of the parties? or whether the suit is required to reopen for amendment of the preliminary decree by incorporating the information of the death of first defendant i.e. mother of plaintiff?

rohit baldota   09 March 2011 at 21:26

specific performance

respected sir,
agreement to sale,
w.s. Given by vendor that agreement not agree because of sign taken on blank stamp what is the solution on this? Please email me

sanjay gopalakrishnan   09 March 2011 at 20:10

Maintainance charges on flat from builder

Dear Experts..
I need some help on maintainance charges applicable for flat purchased from builder.

We recieved posession letter in Nov 2009. Thus expected the builder would apply maintainance charges from Nov 2009 onwards. However the builder has applied maintainance charges on us from June 2009, since they recieved OC (occupation certificate) since June 2009.

Can you please advice, from when the builder can charge maintainance charges? I believe its only fair to apply charges from posession date onwards.

Also is service tax payable on the maintainance charges to builder?

Thanks..

Anonymous   09 March 2011 at 19:39

consumer protection Act

whether a time barred complaint can be adjudicated by a District form if there is no specific cotention regarding limitation

barun deka   09 March 2011 at 19:11

abatement

Dear friends,



there was a second appeal which was disposed off long back..... later on some dispute arose regarding the reliefs and ultimately the supreme court directed us (appellants) to file a petition under Section 152, cpc for amendment of judgment & decree so as to specify the exact reliefs.

now, during the pendency of the petition under S 152 of cpc, two petitioners/appellants died. Now do we need substitution???

Because under order 22 Rule 6, there can be no abatement between the time of final hearing and final judgment.

Now in a petition under S152 neither side can re-argue the matter on merit, therefore final hearing has already concluded and after disposal of the said petition a fresh/modified judgment would be passed. therefore would it not fall under the purview of Order 22 Rule 6?

So if there is no abatement, do we need substitution????

i have done a lot of research but could not find a concrete/definite answer.

Anonymous   09 March 2011 at 18:19

Service matter (seniority)

A person was joined in the Water Resources Department, Bihar as daily wages employee in theyear 1980. After some time State Government came with a resolution to make cut off date as 1.8.1985 to regularise the service of person working before 1.8.1985. The person filed case in thePatna high court in writ petition for regularising his service as the State Government is not taking any steps for his regularisation. Writ was allowed in his favour but the State not regularise theservice. He filed MJC and after some time during pendency of MJC (Contempt) the State regularise his service but he deemed as new appointment. Can he claim his seniority as his initial appointment on 1980. Please reply me with judgment passed in Supreme Court or any High Court, case reported in AIR, SC.
I will be highly obliged for the same

francisray   09 March 2011 at 15:26

share in the property

help