girish narayan nemade
23 March 2011 at 16:40
Dear sir;
I have got a good offer from a compititor company of our company and i have kept my pepers in my company; notice period of my company is 60 days and i have got 40 paid lives balance of last and this year in such case i have kept notice period of 25 days so my 60 days would be completed and my boss dont want to relive me due to cotingency of work previously also he didn't relived me when i wanted to live the job. our HR says that my lives would be compensated but i dont want to go for that and my boss is forcing me to stay in my existing company so please suggest me some legal way to get my self relived from my existing organisation.
Jasmeetsingh
23 March 2011 at 10:18
Dear Sir,
I had filed a domestic Violence complaint availing the provisions of Sec 26 of Protection of women from domestic violence act 2005 before the Civil Court S.D. Pune, in the pending civil case against the brother in-law of the aggrived person, thereaffter husband and wife of brother in- law were added as a party Under Order 1 Rule 10 of C.P.C. as they were the neceessary parties. But Respondent has filed a Criminal Appeal agianst civil courts impeading parties order.
Sir, kindly guide me to solve the following question with an appropriate citation of provision of law: -
1) Whether civil court can adopt Code of Civil Procedure to proceed the DVA complaint filed under Sec 26 of the Domestic Violence Act?
2) Whether court can avail Provisions of Sec 28 (2) of the Act?
3) Can a criminal appeal be filed agaisnt the civil courts order in DVA Proceeding?
4) Can criminal appeal filed against civil courts order be rejected at preliminary stage) if so what citation of with what provision of law?
Thanks in anticipation. Yours truly
Jasmeetsingh
Anonymous
22 March 2011 at 17:49
dear sir'
Kindly email me the copy of the patna highcourt judgement oct. 2009 on enhancement of retirement age of college teachers. I failed to get the copy from the website of patna highcourt because i don't have any authentication no. So the same may please be attached to my email ID sanjivkumaryadav@gmail.com at ur earliest
Anonymous
22 March 2011 at 17:48
Dear Sir,
Please send the following decision with details to me
1987(1)LS554
Thanking you, Sir,
Anonymous
22 March 2011 at 17:44
I have posted a query on Transport Woes in the Expert's forum. The facts in the issue are very glaring that though every citizen is aware of the plight, no concrete steps have been initiated to set things in order. Public Interest Litigation do not necessarily yield the desired results to highlight the matters which are detrimental to Public Interest at large. My specific doubts are summed up as under:
(a) As in the case of high profile matters, under which circumstances the Court intervenes into the matters which are detrimental to public interests?
(b) What are the Constitutional provisions and obligations on the part of the Apex or High Courts to question the authority of the State ?
(c) Is there any Judicial Committee which monitors the matters which upset the peace and tranquility in the State on account of misdemeanors of Public Authorities?
(d) Are there any precedents which match the similar facts where interests of common citizens are protected by the intervention of Courts?
(e) Whether any High Court is vested with any constitutional powers to question the acts of the State in the absence of any Public Interest Litigation?
I need specific point-war guidance from the expert panel in the interest of Common Citizens.
Anonymous
22 March 2011 at 17:43
Hello everyone....
i wanted some brief information regarding the case STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V. DR. PRAFULLA K.DESAI (2003) 4 SCC 601.
And i also wanted that how can i relate the above mentioned case with Article 21. of the Constitution Of India.
Anonymous
22 March 2011 at 17:41
Mr Ranjit nad rani got married on 1/4/75 as per hindu rights and customs But Mrs ranjit approached to District court, aurangabad for divorce in 79 and obtained Decree, Ms. Rani remained unmarried. in jan 81 Mr. Ranjit came to know that Ms Rani gave birth to a female child named Ranjitha.
Some time later Mr. Ranjit got married to one Madhuri and was leaving a happy life with two children Bunty and Bubly
During Financial Year 06-07 Mr. Ranjit filed an income tax return where in he has shown a family property consisting of a resendital property where he is leacing noew and a commercial complex located at Nirala Bazar, Aurangabad worth 5 crores. this property was inherited form his father.
Ms. Ranjitha got maried to mr. yusuf who is medical doctor. Ms ranjitha sent a legal notice on jan 1 07 claiming a share in Hindu Family property in capacity of Daughter.
Mr Ranjit denied that Ms Ranjitha was born to him. The Family court aurangabad directed for the DNA test for both the parties. but mr ranjit refused to undergo the same. then family court held that mrs ranjitha is a legitimate daughter of Mr Ranjit.
Aggregieved by diposal order of the family court, Mr Ranjit challenged this order before Hon'ble High court of Bombay, Bench at aurangabad.
raghavendra
22 March 2011 at 17:40
sir ,
can anybody tell me what are the cases coming in economic offence court ,
what is jurisdiction ,
under which Act ,cases can file in economics offece court
Anonymous
22 March 2011 at 17:04
Can a royalty (or any tax or fee) be imposed, for the first time, without the authority of law or a notification not having the force of law (i.e. through a mere executive decision)? If not, continued payment of the levy for more than three decades would be held out as an estoppel or limitation for seeking relief from the Court?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
S.149(2)M.V.Act
Whether when Insurance Co. is challenging the Award only with respect to S.149(2),permission under S.170 is still needed in filing appeal? To me it is not legally required.Want a ruling for this as urgent.