Anonymous
02 April 2011 at 16:33
A witness standing in the witness box & giving the evidence or he was cross examined during that time other witness standing by side or any person for the or public sitting in a open court (called as a layman audience) says some bad words to the accused or the witness who was cross examined than it has been said as per the contempt of cour act, 1971 section 2 he was purposelly interfering the court proceedings so it is said that it is a contempt of court & person is laible for contempt case but as per section 10 no High Court shall take cognizance of a contempt alleged to have been committed in respect of a court subordinate to it where such contempt is an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
if any offence is punisable under the IPC, 1860 than no contempt case will be held. So know contempt case should be filed or section 499 (defamamtion) case should be filed against that person. Becasue as th person was givin bad words to xyz person in the court during the proceedings so it is a defamation becasue he was insulting the person without any reason but simaltenoulsy it is contempt of court also so which one will prewill & can both the case (contempt case, Section 499) can be filed on that person ?
Section 10 Every High Court shall have and exercise the same jurisdiction, powers and authority, in accordance with the same procedure and practice, in respect of contempt's of courts subordinate to it and it has and exercise in respect of contempt's of itself.
Provided that no High Court shall take cognizance of a contempt alleged to have been committed in respect of a court subordinate to it where such contempt is an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
Also can both the cases can be filled under the same court or any different court repsectively.
Thanks
God Bless U All.
Anonymous
02 April 2011 at 12:00
what is the court fees i will have to pay to file a suit to cancel the "release deed" obtained from me fruadulently. i have paid Rs 25/- AS COURT FEE AS PER sec 24[d] of karnataka court fees @suits valuation act . I am not asking for pocession of the property,please let me know the actual court fees to be paid.
Anonymous
02 April 2011 at 11:58
Customary diverse has been taken from my wife before Panch. In my community has been giving these types of diverse since 1904. This allowed as per section 29 (2) under Hindu Marriage Act.
I am Hindu & resident at Pune. My wife has suit filed against me for maintenance at Kalyan & Pimpari court in Maharashtra. I also suit filed against her for getting diverse on cruelty ground at Pune Court.
We have taken written on stamp paper these cases are withdrawn by her & me.
I want know what should I do if I have to withdraw case from Pune Court?
My wife also withdraw case from Kalyan court against maintenance & Pimpari court for maintenance under domestic violence act 2005.
I will have to written apply to Pune court with diverse paper duly attested then the said case will be withdrawn by my signed.
In Pimpari & Kalyan court my wife will withdraw case by her signed.
Court requires my signed on withdraw application?
Can any one me guide on above procedure?
Thanking you in an advance
Anonymous
02 April 2011 at 11:48
Please tell me all about the formalities to be followed before commencing and while running a commercial establishment in the state orissa state.
Anonymous
02 April 2011 at 09:37
My father is a memeber of a plot purcahe type society of 19 members owning small medium and large flats.
This one of the (maybe only) societies that apportions repairs and maintenence expenses on all common areas like compund, terrace,landings .passages,pump room,compound wall etc on equal sharing basis .In almost all societies the sharing is on area basis except the common service charges.
The society is going for redevelopment wherin now one smaller flat holder is asking for equal sharing in additional FSI benefits by way of his having contributed to the expenses equally and also the fact that even in future he will have to share the burden for expenses in same way for maybe double the number of flats that may come up for the rest of the life of building.
Is his contenetion right. The byelaws and MCS Act 1960 are silent on same.
Whilst the Dy Registrar in 1990 gave an opinion on the request of larger falt owners that the expenses are to be shared, now he states that the smaller flat owner has to approach appropriate forum.
an anyone advice or is there any judgements?
Please advice
Anonymous
02 April 2011 at 09:35
We stay at thane in a 277 square feet Building (pagody system a two floor appt) which belongs to my grandfather (as per municipality record)
My grand father has three sons
A, B, C
C is my father; we stay there since past thirty years .my other two uncles (A&B) stays separately since last thirty years
We are paying rent (we get receipt on out grand father’s name) since last thirty years,
My grandfather died in 2001 & since we had not changed any record in municipality.
Apparently our family stays there since a very long period & we are the real owner of the property
The said property has been demolished by all tenants because it was declared as dangerous by municipality.
Now we all tenants are trying to develop a new apartment & now my questions is
1)My older uncle is demanding something from the property can he do so ?What we can do to prevent him interfering in our property?
2) can we legally put our( My fathers) name in municipality records as against our grand father considering our very long stay in the Building? It means they had given up their claim by passing of three decades & now how can they demand now?
Please suggest
Anonymous
02 April 2011 at 09:33
http://www.openrti.co.cc/
Kindly visit the link. If the page have any problem, download the zip file. I have never heard of this type problem before. If anybody have seen this type problem, kindly post an article in this club.
The main question confusing me is "Why these are going on?" This is not a normal situation. Most people generally search legal advice in abnormal position. But this case is beyond my range. I can go to the Court and fight and win, but I failed to understand the reason on the actions. So I am putting the problem for the world. Kindly analyze and help
Anonymous
01 April 2011 at 19:55
Person starts to occupy premises as guest, then refuses to leave and always makes excuses.
According to law, both owner and occupier are liable to pay their half share of Kolkata Municipal Corp (KMC) taxes for water connection etc.
1) Is this person occupying the premises as unwanted guest liable to pay occupier's share of municipal taxes?
2) If owner accepts occupier's share of municipal taxes from this unwanted guest, does this person gain tenancy rights?
BWD
01 April 2011 at 17:58
Hello
Need to know the formula for calculating compensation in case of death of a car owner while driving - in hit-and-run case.
Also need to know what all factors should be considered.
It would be great if someone can share the multiplier chart soft copy.
Thanks in advance.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Micro Finance
Respected Experts,
As the SARFAESI ACT 2002 is applicable only when amount due is more than 1 Lakhs .
so could anybody provide some some knowledge on how the Micro Financial Institution realized their loan amount back from defaulter if the default amount is less than 1 Lakhs i.e in case of Rs 40000/-,Rs 50000/-.Is there any specific law on that by parliament.