Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 14:06
In writ petition if the respondent has mentioend that there was a complaint made to infomration commission but failed to mention that outcome of the enquiry conducted by the informaiton commission will that be held against the respondent in the appeal.
The writ petition was filed by public authority to quash the order of information commission however the respondent/ RTI applicant has also got a findings against the public authorities in another order passed prior to this impugned order of the information commission.
The writ petition was allowed without considering the earlier order and respondent prefers an appeal against this order.
Please clarify. Thanks
kiran
06 April 2011 at 13:16
pls provide the draft of application for condonation of delay u/s 17a of companies act
santosh kumar huded
06 April 2011 at 13:00
whether conference hall whose daily rent is less than Rs 5000/- is exempted from karnataka luxury tax act
Priyanka Sanchania
06 April 2011 at 12:55
Hi, I would like to know whether APMC act has been amended in Uttar Pradesh. The last upate was that it has initiaited admin process for same.
Also is it possible for farmers to sell their commodities on National forwad exchange(NCDEX) in Uttar Pradesh?
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 12:03
Dear Sirs
I am resident of Chandigarh and married to a himachli girl who born in himachal. after marriage we are living in chandigarh and i want to buy some land in himachal pradesh in name of my wife as i being non himachali cannot buy land there.
there was some ancestoral land was there with the grandfather's name of my wife and I approched him to get some land in her name even payin the cost but he just not did anything and just promise. now grandfather of my wife is dead and somehow my inlaws got land transferred to the names of my wife's brothers but nothing on her sister(my wife's) name even I ask them hundred times.her father was dead even before our marriage. Being a self made man my concious don't allow me to beg to them so I stop having anykind of relation with my in-law's family. but I want to buy a piece of land there without the help of my inlaws there are few of relatives there whom i help financially and they may can do me a favour. My querry is if any cousin's or uncles of my wife can gift land to my wife? or is there any other way I can buy land in himachal pradesh. If any himachli born(my wife) can buy any commercial or industrial or agricultural land any way.
thanks
Pankaj
06 April 2011 at 10:24
Dear Sir,
A company is established in 1960 as public company.with 3 directors and promoter. The company is also listed on BSE.
Later the company was acquired by others through acquisition of shares in the year 1970.
The people who acquired were not involved in promotion of the company in any way however they only responsible for growth of the company.
The 3 promoter directors resigned from the office of director and acquirer were appointed on the board of the company.
Now whether these acquirer can be termed as promoters? (under SEBI Act as well as companies Act)
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 09:29
Dear sir
let me try to put the facts first.
my grandfather is one of the five legal heirs of 96 cents of un-partitioned land. because of some unresolved problems the partition could not be done as of yet. now, none of the five original legal heirs are living. however, when they were alive they had entered into a verbal understanding on partitioning the property according to which they constructed their own houses in the land they have been assigned and de-marketed the boundary with a wall. ironically, due to unknown reasons, the verbal partitioning has not put on paper even now. different share holders have different ideas on partitioning the land which is not in accordance with the verbal understanding reached between the original five heirs. and this is the root cause of dispute preventing successful partitioning of the property.
the entire land is still in the name of late Mr. LMM, father of the original five heirs. the land tax was paid in his name only.
now here is my question.
today i received an information that grandson of one of the original five legal heirs has done something where by now he can pay the land tax for the property under his control and that now he has gained the rights to do anything in the land under his control.
can this be true? is there a provision in law which permits this without obtaining permission from other share holder of the property?
Anonymous
05 April 2011 at 23:23
dear sir,
we are a family of four brothers and three sister.
my father expired in the yr 1983, the probate of the will was obtained in 1986, and in the year 1999 the house where we currently live was transferred from my fathers huf to his four sons and my mother, this was done because in the will my father had written that his daughters dont have CLAIM INTREST AND SHARE in his estates in the property(also he had mentioned in the will that he would like to give his 1/6th share in the property to four of his sons). also we had orally partitioned in the year 1999 (we have no papers supporting the same) our house and place where each member would stay though there are no walls supporting the same
now my sisters are threatening to claim their right in the said property because of the amendment in the year 2005, can they do it ?
kindly help as we dont not want them to claim their right
thank you
also note the property in question was given to my father's huf by my grandfather via will
Anonymous
05 April 2011 at 23:16
dear sir,
we are a family of four brothers and three sister.
my father expired in the yr 1983, the probate of the will was obtained in 1986, and in the year 1999 the house where we currently live was transferred from my fathers huf to his four sons and my mother, this was done because in the will my father had written that his daughters dont have CLAIM INTREST AND SHARE in his estates in the property(also he had mentioned in the will that he would like to give his 1/6th share in the property to four of his sons). also we had orally partitioned in the year 1999 (we have no papers supporting the same) our house and place where each member would stay though there are no walls supporting the same
now my sisters are threatening to claim their right in the said property because of the amendment in the year 2005, can they do it ?
kindly help as we dont not want them to claim their right
thank you
also please note that the property in question was given my father by my granfather via will
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Brief details about the below mentioned case
Hello everyone....
i wanted some brief information regarding the case STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V. DR. PRAFULLA K.DESAI (2003) 4 SCC 601.
And i also wanted that how can i relate the above mentioned case with Article 21. of the Constitution Of India.