Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:59
OUR TRADE ITEM: DOMESTIC AND INDUSTRAL SEWING MACHINES, SPARE PARTS, NEEDLES ETC
COVERED UNDER H.S.S. 84.52 WE WISH TO KNOW THAT OUR ITEMS COMES UNDER M.R.P. ACT AND IS IT REQUIRE TO PUT M.R.P. STICKER ON PACKED ITEMS. WE ARE DELAER/IMPORTER OF THIS ITEMS.
INDUSTRIAL SEWING MACHINES AND SPARE PARTS ARE USED IN GARMENT INDUSTRY
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:58
the question is the owner of the car (private car meant for personal use) let out his car on hire to some persons. The vehicle met with an accident and one of the passenger in the car died and his LR'S filed claim petition before MACT claiming compensation against the owner of the car as well as Insurance Co.
In the cross examination it is proved that the deceased paid Rs 3000/- as fare charges.
the point is since the vehicle is a private car and the car was let out on hire Policy does not cover hire or reward.
Any judgements to show that Insurance company is not liable to pay compensation as the vehicle was let out on hire.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:56
I kindly request you to provide me information on Trade Unions in Pune. How long can a Company(new organization) be free from Unions. How can we restrict Unions entering the Company.
Please provide me the Shops and Establishment Act 1948 also.
Thank you in Advance.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:55
cn u let me knw the notification no. which defines the items which are not covered in any schedule and falls under the category of Ganeral rates i.e.12.5%
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:54
Hi,
please furnish standard documentation for pledge of shares of listed & unlisted companies
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:51
A was allotted a residential plot by State Urban Development Authority in 1986, by a letter of allotment. The Authority has set a time schedule to construct the house on this plot or pay Non Construction charges but A did not construct the house on this plot, and died. His wife B by a transfer letter got the plot was transferred in the name of B and her two sons, but till date B has not got the registry of the plot done in the name of allot tees from authority. The Authority has been extending the time limit for the construction, and as per the last letter the allottees were advised to complete the construction by 31st, Dec2009. For the registry the alotteess were to pay all the accumulated Non Construction Charges, then obtain NDC ( No Dues certificate) from Authority, and then only the Authority would have allowed the registry of the plot in the name of allottees.
After the registry the aloottes could have become the owner of the plot, and could either complete the construction by 31st, Dec2009, or could sell the plot after obtaining NOC from the authority.
As on date the Authority has not received any policy from their Head Office clarifying whether any further extension has to be given to the allottees for completing the construction, after 31st, Dec2009 or these plots are to be resumed, and therefore are not accepting any payment of Non Construction charges and hence are not issuing any NOC, NDC, and registry.
As per the locally available feedback the State Urban Development Authority, usually does not resume the plots and gives the extension.
B states she does not have enough money to pay the Non Construction Charges and for Obtaining NOC, and cost of registry, B wants the interested buyer to first give her some token money (Sain) and then enter into a purchase agreement with her (Biana), and pay her 20% (Rs.2 lac) of the agreed cost of Rs.10 Lac, after which she will get the registry in her name, and after the registry she will sell the plot.
Kindly advice on queries:
It is not known two sons of B are major or minor. What Legal formalities B has to complete to sell the plot.
Untill the Authority gets a clear policy to allow further extension or resume plot, should any buyer enter into Biana. What precautions Buyer should take. What should be the legal language of the Sain and Biana in this case? How much time for the registry and payment should be fixed?
The Biana should be written on ordinary paper or stamp paper. If it should be written on stamp paper, who should purchase it, buyer or seller or both jointly, and should this Biana be registered in the Suvidha Centre and how many witness from the side of seller and buyer should sign.
The interested buyer has seen the photocopy of the allotment letter, through the property dealer, in the name of B and her two sons, in which it is written that construction should be completed by 31st, Dec2009 , but it is not written that if not completed the plot shall be resumed, and it is not known to him the two sons are major or minor, and he is interested to buy this property, and is being advised by the dealer and others that right now B is need of money and cost of plot is Rs. 2 Lac less than market price, and he should enter into Sain and Biana so that he gets the first right to buy this property, as and when Authority gets a clear policy to allow further extension.
In case the authority decides to resume the plot, can the buyer claim that he was not aware of the fact that this plot can be resumed? And how can he get double the amount of Biana from the allottees.
Can the buyer be cheated in this case?
Kindly advise.
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:50
2. The degrees of Criminal intent and resultant Criminal liability are directly proportionate to each other, therefore, a person who causes death by rash or negligent act can be punished for imprisonment up to only two years whereas, the person who knowingly or intentionally commit it can be imprisoned for ten years / life term and even can be hanged. To the contra, a convict u/s. 304-A I.P.C. seldom gets benefit of probation whereas a similarly situated culprit of Section 304 part II I.P.C. may get it. Examine the justification behind it ?
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:47
Dear Sirs,
The following judgement copy urgently need
the case in madras highcourt.
Justie Samikannu awarded decision in the case of Vadalur konda Reddiar Vs Hindu Religious endowment Board that Vadalur Vallalar shrines
Case law
ple.send my email id saranaks@gmail.com
Anonymous
06 April 2011 at 15:45
DOEACC Society prints the following condition at the backside of the marksheet
The application of review must reach to their office within one month from the date of printing of the result.
Now in a case I saw, the result was printed on 2nd day of a month and it was posted on 26th.
The question is:-
1. Are they totally free to post the result as per "go as you" process? Can they post it after 40 days of printing?
2. As per the terms and condition, the time will be taken from the date of printing, so if someone receives the result after one month then there is no chance of applying for review. Who will take the responsibility?
3. Can a student ask for the copy of answer sheet from DOEACC (or any exam-authority) through RTI Act? Is there any process to prove that the authority is not sincere in valuation of the exam? (where they make dealy to prevent review).
4. Can a candidate apply for review on the basis of the result published in internet? DOEACC publish the result in their website with a declaration that there is no guaranty of correctness of the result published in internet.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
LPO
hello sir,
can any body advise me how to get a LPO franchise. i am an practising lawyer and partner of a law firm in J&K and want to start LPO.