C Suresh Krishna
16 May 2011 at 11:44
We have supplied some materials to our customer in two different quarters i.e. 1st and 2nd Quarter of FY 2007-08, but customer had provided us single C Form. C Form was issued on receipt basis. On 27.06.07 one truck material was dispatched to customer and received in to there factory in July-2007 and another truck was sent on 13.07.07 and they had received in July-2007, therefore they have issued single C Form for the 2nd Quarter of FY 2007-08
Now the Sales Tax Authorities rejecting the same and demanding two separate c forms for two quarter. The said unit was now closed, and they are unable to provide us C Form.
Our local consultant filed appeal on it and quoted on judgment of Maharashtra Sales tax department, but still sales tax department (Raipur, Chhattisgarh) in not convince.
Kindly suggest us what we can do now. Please send case law or any thing to resolved this issue
Anonymous
16 May 2011 at 11:14
My brother in law used to stya alongwith parents. His parents rejected their daughter in lw and hence my brother in law had to leave the house and stay separately. The rejection of his wife was typical indian story where she did not match upto the standards of in laws. 3 Years back his father expired. The father left some property for my brother in law, his wife and his younger son. The mother transferred all the properties to the younger son as she stays with the younger son. The mother is a depression patient but dead against the wife of my brother in law and blames her for snatching her elder son from her. The pension of the dead father and the mother is being taken away by the younger son, most of the property has been taken away by the younger son and complete gold has been taken by the younger son. The younger son also has the same hatred againt her sister in law and behaves like father and mother. Now my brother in law who had been avoiding dispute and conflict has decided to take legal recourse to get back his share in pension, gold and property. All these were not ancestral and were made by his father and mother. In such cases where the son is dis inherited because the wife of the son is rejected does my brother in law have any negotiation power ? Please advise
Anonymous
16 May 2011 at 08:19
Dear Sir,
I would like to know the minimum wages for “Group D” staff in Hospitals Sector in West Bengal.
rajesh makol
15 May 2011 at 17:04
Please study the following case and suggest:
DDA alloted a rooftop Janta flat 123-C to Mrs. Raj Rani in 1988.
In 1989 Raj Rani sold the DDA flat to Surinder Arora via a GPA registered in Noida and executed the will and receipt in favour of Mr. Charanjit singh Sharma on the same date.
Surinder Arora was in possession of flat and build unauthorised construction 3 room set on the roof of the said DDA Flat.
Due to dispute between Surinder Arora and Charanjit Singh, Charanjit Singh mortgaged the unauthorised construction to Mr. Sushil Arora for Rs. 2 lac and gave possession of unauthorised floor in 1999 via Notary attested conditional agreement which said that in case he is not able to return the amount he will execute proper sale deed in favour of Sushil Arora. Surinder Arora sold the said flat on the basis of GPA to Rakesh Malhotra in 2000.
In 2008 Rakesh Malhotra created forged will and receipt of Raj Rani to Surinder Arora to complete the chain of documents and sold the flat to Lalita on the basis of GPA will and receipt.
In March 2010 Sushil Arora who didn't get the mortgaged amount executed GPA and will and receipt for the unauthorised construction by renaming it as 123-D (which does not exist in Govt. records) and sold the same to Rita Kumari. Rita Kumari resold the same to Sudha SAchdeva via registered GPA and receipt.
Lalita is in possession of 123-C and Sudha SAchdeva is in possession of 123-D.
Dispute between Lalita and Sudha arose and Lalita filed a civil suit for cancellation of papers and depossession of extended structure on the basis of GPA, Will and REceipt. In reply Sudha Sachdeva challenged the will and receipt producing the will and receipt executed by Raj Rani in favour of Charanjit Singh.
What shall both of them do now?
Can the case filed by Lalita be dismissed just because the will in receipt filed by her are not genuine?
What are the options available with Lalita?
What is the most probable outcome of the case?
Please reply. It is extremely urgent.
Thanks for all the help previously extended .
Anonymous
15 May 2011 at 14:15
Hi my freind working in a IT Support company.at that company , if anyone resigned they will not adjust pending PL AND CL,and not give that amount of pending leaves. my question is this law is different for different company.pls give solution. and same company not giving apprisal on time.every year they delay more than 6 months without arrears. pls help them.
niranjan
15 May 2011 at 08:27
sir, pls solve my confusion.
on 1.1.2011 Mr x sold final product to her wife, Mrs. X at Rs. 1000/- per kg
Mrs. X sell all goods purchased from his husband to his son Mr Y. Mr. Y sells these goods in retail market.
Mrs. X sold the goods to Mr.Y as follows:
on 1.1.2011----@ 1500/-
on 15.1.2011----@ 2000/-
goods purchased on 1.1.2011 are sold by Mrs X to his son on 15.1.2011.
My confusion is that
what is the Assessable value of good sold by Mr. X to her wife Mrs. X on 1.1.2011?
whether 1500/- or 2000/-.
Rule 9 in the exact language is writte as follows--
--When the assessee so arranges that the excisable goods are not sold by an assessee except to or through a person who is related in the manner specified in either of sub-clauses (ii), (iii) or (iv) of clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 4 of the Act, the value of the goods shall be the normal transaction value at which these are sold by the related person at the time of removal, to buyers (not being related person); or where such goods are not sold to such buyers, to buyers (being related person), who sells such goods in retail :
Provided that in a case where the related person does not sell the goods but uses or consumes such goods in the production or manufacture of articles, the value shall be determined in the manner specified in rule 8.
so i am thinking that AV of goods removed from X to Mrs. X on 1.1.2011 should be Rs. 1500/-
Am i correct or not?
Thank U for your help.-
Anonymous
15 May 2011 at 08:05
Sir,
I had filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in August 2010 for quashing the Order of my compulsory retirement as a measure of penalty after my Department went full bore against me after the High Court had quashed the Inquiry proceedings and charge sheet issued to me on the grounds of mala fides but gave liberty to my Department to proceed afresh against me on the same charges which had been quashed.
From the first date which was about seven months ago till now no notice has been issued so far. I have crossed over the age of superannuation.
What would be or could be best course of action for me?
With regards,
Anonymous.
Arka Foundation
14 May 2011 at 23:22
Dear Forum,
I am dealing with one case,
wherein husband is an Orphan [well qualified] got married[love] to a girl[well qualified].
Marriage was performed in a temple.
Husband lost job during recession in Oct '2008.
Meanwhile wife went to house and filed a 498a case after 6 months.
Husbnad tried for reconcilliation with the wife till last Jan ' 2010.
Now no where abouts of GIRL, address changed.
This is all because of POLICE without any prima facie and by taking bribe.
Can we file a CBI case on the POLICE.
If so, please tell the proceedure.
niranjan
14 May 2011 at 22:50
sir, pls solve my confusion.
on 1.1.2011 Mr x sold final product to her wife, Mrs. X at Rs. 1000/- per kg
Mrs. X sell all goods purchased from his husband to his son Mr Y. Mr. Y sells these goods in retail market.
Mrs. X sold the goods to Mr.Y as follows:
on 1.1.2011----@ 1500/-
on 15.1.2011----@ 2000/-
goods purchased on 1.1.2011 are sold by Mrs X to his son on 15.1.2011.
My confusion is that
what is the Assessable value of good sold by Mr. X to her wife Mrs. X on 1.1.2011?
whether 1500/- or 2000/-.
Rule 9 in the exact language is writte as follows--
--When the assessee so arranges that the excisable goods are not sold by an assessee except to or through a person who is related in the manner specified in either of sub-clauses (ii), (iii) or (iv) of clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 4 of the Act, the value of the goods shall be the normal transaction value at which these are sold by the related person at the time of removal, to buyers (not being related person); or where such goods are not sold to such buyers, to buyers (being related person), who sells such goods in retail :
Provided that in a case where the related person does not sell the goods but uses or consumes such goods in the production or manufacture of articles, the value shall be determined in the manner specified in rule 8.
so i am thinking that AV of goods removed from X to Mrs. X on 1.1.2011 should be Rs. 1500/-
is i am correct or not?
Thank U for your help.-
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Accused have right get exhibits
Dear Seniors,
Does the accused have the right to receive POLICE Diary and exhibits of the evidence collected from the complainant without RTI.
or
What does the accused have right to get from the station except Case Diary.