santosh
24 May 2011 at 14:36
hi , every body i would like to know what procedure i would have to follow to construct a house in a village in pune district of maharastra , as if now i have came to know that the surpanch dosen't have any authority to approve the construction done in the village instead we have to take permission from the collector or some competent authority what its i am in complete confusion please guide me in this direction and also how much time this procedure would take to complete thanks in advance
jitendra singh
24 May 2011 at 13:20
Dear Dhingra sir,
Iam chartered Accountant, I want to know what will company directors will do, to get their employees pf no.from authorities
Rama mohan Acharya
24 May 2011 at 10:35
The permanent Arbitration machinery has been setup for arbitration of disputes amongst CPSUs. One of the PUS had initiated court case in lower consumer forum,and on failure preferred appeal in State Consumer Forum and national tribunal respectively. Now Supreme Court is the appelate Court. can the CPSU approach the PAM at this stage instead of filing SLP? If yeas kindly quote the relevant provision/guideline please.
vaibhav
23 May 2011 at 17:13
hi sir or mam i want ask about the law clases in delhi in which place they teach law so plz help me to choose a coaching class of law
Anonymous
23 May 2011 at 16:37
A property Situated At Tamilnadu at Chennai (heart of the city) (a housing site) which was mortgaged to Bank and the Bank had taken action due to NPA and had obtained Recovery Certificate from DRT (2008) and had sold property under sarfaesi Act, and rules and while trying to register the property with sub registrar is objecting that the said sale certificate can not be registered as the same is Government Porambokku Land and is showing some list/note issued by Govt of Tamilnadu showing some list of TS No. and Block numbers and hence at this juncture what the future course available to the auction buyer and banks. The mortgage date with bank is 2001 and NPA Date is 2003-04. The land was having sales deeds since 1967 and the last owner had sale deed dated 1988 and no body had PATTA for the land
Member (Account Deleted)
21 May 2011 at 23:58
hello experts, i need a help...can anyone provide me the chart of pecuniary jurisdiction? i mean according to pecuniary valuation which court has jurisdiction to hear a particular case? thanx & regards,
Anonymous
21 May 2011 at 21:41
sir,my query is owner declared under pepsu rights after 1972 is challengeble and order of the authority can be set aside because in 1972 haryana land and cieling act was avilable after 1972 then tenant must apply under this act. on this point high court of p&b allowed the writ petition filed by landlord.aggrived from the order tenant file slp civil which also has been dismiss by supreme court in limni, now what relief is avilable for tenant in supreme court
Anonymous
21 May 2011 at 13:46
Illegal appointment since 1989 but working continuously through tactics and due to loop holes of law. In a autonomous body of central Govt. an employee who has no basic and essential qualification since 1989, not having relevant experience certificate of three years for which he was granted nine marks, he got the two promotions from 1989, however not having minimum qualification. In 1992 the investigation committee framed by Hon’ble Central Minister found his appointment ab-initio illegal on the same grounds. But due to high level corruption, higher authorities diluted the inquiry report in1997. In CAT he was impleded as a party in 2000 while the process was started from 1998. After found the guilty in CAT he was terminating accordingly. He filed the appeal in High Court in 2002. Now he is again sure that he will escape safely due to res-judicata, on the grounds of limitations and locus standi . Please provide the relevant citation by which I defend accordingly. Please provide some Supreme Court’s relevant Judgments by which I hammer his law of limitations, law of res-judicata and locus standi.Please reply as soon as possible.
mayank jain
20 May 2011 at 14:20
i want to know the liabilities of coloniser redarding labour tax , if the construction work is on contract basis. if the liabilities fall on coloniser than it will on full construction value or only on labour part.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
SARFAESI
I have sanctioned a loan of 20.00 Lacs and cash credit limit of 5.00 Lacs The loan and limit was sanctioned against a property and same time. But The bank had given me full loan,but cash credit limit disbursed partially. I have given many reminder to bank for full disbursement of cash credit limit.But the bank has refused my request my dues gone up 26.00 lacs.The bank issued me SARFAESI notice U/S 13(2).
according to SARFAESI act the notice will be issued only when the dues are 20% of the principal.
Now my question is which amount will be calculated as basis for dues 20.00 lacs(only loan amount) or 20.00 (loan amount)+5.00 lacs (cash credit amount)=25.00 Lacs